The Project Gutenberg Etext of Lives of the Poets: Gay, Thomson, Young etc.
by Samuel Johnson
(#4 in our series by Samuel Johnson)

Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the
copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing
this or any other Project Gutenberg file.

Please do not remove this header information.

This header should be the first thing seen when anyone starts to
view the eBook. Do not change or edit it without written permission.
The words are carefully chosen to provide users with the information
needed to understand what they may and may not do with the eBook.
To encourage this, we have moved most of the information to the end,
rather than having it all here at the beginning.


**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts**

**eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971**

*****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!*****

Information on contacting Project Gutenberg to get eBooks, and
further information, is included below.  We need your donations.

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a 501(c)(3)
organization with EIN [Employee Identification Number] 64-6221541
Find out about how to make a donation at the bottom of this file.


Title: Lives of the Poets: Gay, Thomson, Young etc.

Author: Samuel Johnson

Release Date: November, 2003  [Etext #4678]
[Yes, we are more than one year ahead of schedule]
[This file was first posted on February 26, 2002]
[Most recently updated: February 26, 2002]

Edition: 10

Language: English

Character set encoding: ASCII

The Project Gutenberg Etext of Lives of the Poets: Gay, Thomson, Young etc.
by Samuel Johnson
******This file should be named lvgay10.txt or lvgay10.zip******

Corrected EDITIONS of our etexts get a new NUMBER, lvgay11.txt
VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, lvgay10a.txt

Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the US
unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we usually do not
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

The "legal small print" and other information about this book
may now be found at the end of this file.  Please read this
important information, as it gives you specific rights and
tells you about restrictions in how the file may be used.

***
This etext was produced by Les Bowler, St. Ives, Dorset.

LIVES OF THE POETS (GAY, THOMSON, YOUNG, GRAY ETC)




Contents.

Introduction by Henry Morley.

William King.
Charles Montague, Earl of Halifax.
Dr. Thomas Parnell.
Samuel Garth.
Nicholas Rowe.
John Gay.
Thomas Tickell.
William Somervil[l]e.
James Thomson.
Dr. Isaac Watts.
Ambrose Philips.
Gilbert West.
William Collins.
John Dyer.
William Shenstone.
Edward Young.
David Mallet.
Mark Akenside.
Thomas Gray.
George Lyttelton.




INTRODUCTION.



This volume contains a record of twenty lives, of which only one--
that of Edward Young--is treated at length.  It completes our
edition of Johnson's Lives of the Poets, from which a few only of
the briefest and least important have been omitted.

The eldest of the Poets here discussed were Samuel Garth, Charles
Montague (Lord Halifax), and William King, who were born within the
years 1660-63.  Next in age were Addison's friend Ambrose Philips,
and Nicholas Rowe the dramatist, who was also the first editor of
Shakespeare's plays after the four folios had appeared.  Ambrose
Philips and Rowe were born in 1671 and 1673, and Isaac Watts in
1674.  Thomas Parnell, born in 1679, would follow next, nearly of
like age with Young, whose birth-year was 1681.  Pope's friend John
Gay was of Pope's age, born in 1688, two years later than Addison's
friend Thomas Tickell, who was born in 1686.  Next in the course of
years came, in 1692, William Somerville, the author of  "The Chace."
John Dyer, who wrote "Grongar Hill," and James Thomson, who wrote
the "Seasons," were both born in the year 1700.  They were two of
three poets--Allan Ramsay, the third--who, almost at the same time,
wrote verse instinct with a fresh sense of outward Nature which was
hardly to be found in other writers of that day.  David Mallet,
Thomson's college-friend and friend of after-years--who shares with
Thomson the curiosity of critics who would decide which of them
wrote "Rule Britannia"--was of Thomson's age.

The other writers of whose lives Johnson here gives his note were
men born in the beginning of the eighteenth century:  Gilbert West,
the translator of Pindar, in 1706; George Lyttelton, in 1709.
William Shenstone, whose sense of Nature, although true, was mixed
with the conventions of his time, and who once asked a noble friend
to open a waterfall in the garden upon which the poet spent his
little patrimony, was born in 1714; Thomas Gray, in 1716; William
Collins, in 1720; and Mark Akenside, in 1721.  In Collins, while he
lived with loss of reason, Johnson, who had fears for himself, took
pathetic interest.  Akenside could not interest him much.  Akenside
made his mark when young with "The Pleasures of Imagination," a good
poem, according to the fashion of the time, when read with due
consideration as a young man's first venture for fame.  He spent
much of the rest of his life in overloading it with valueless
additions.  The writer who begins well should let well alone, and,
instead of tinkering at bygone work, follow the course of his own
ripening thought.  He should seek new ways of doing worthy service
in the years of labour left to him.

H. M.



KING.



William King was born in London in 1663; the son of Ezekiel King, a
gentleman.  He was allied to the family of Clarendon.

From Westminster School, where he was a scholar on the foundation
under the care of Dr. Busby, he was at eighteen elected to Christ
Church in 1681; where he is said to have prosecuted his studies with
so much intenseness and activity, that before he was eight years'
standing he had read over, and made remarks upon, twenty-two
thousand odd hundred books and manuscripts.  The books were
certainly not very long, the manuscripts not very difficult, nor the
remarks very large; for the calculator will find that he despatched
seven a day for every day of his eight years; with a remnant that
more than satisfies most other students.  He took his degree in the
most expensive manner, as a GRAND COMPOUNDER; whence it is inferred
that he inherited a considerable fortune.

In 1688, the same year in which he was made Master of Arts, he
published a confutation of Varillas's account of Wickliffe; and,
engaging in the study of the civil law, became Doctor in 1692, and
was admitted advocate at Doctors' Commons.

He had already made some translations from the French, and written
some humorous and satirical pieces; when, in 1694, Molesworth
published his "Account of Denmark," in which he treats the Danes and
their monarch with great contempt; and takes the opportunity of
insinuating those wild principles by which he supposes liberty to be
established, and by which his adversaries suspect that all
subordination and government is endangered.

This book offended Prince George; and the Danish Minister presented
a memorial against it.  The principles of its author did not please
Dr. King; and therefore he undertook to confute part, and laugh at
the rest.  The controversy is now forgotten:  and books of this kind
seldom live long when interest and resentment have ceased.

In 1697 he mingled in the controversy between Boyle and Bentley; and
was one of those who tried what wit could perform in opposition to
learning, on a question which learning only could decide.

In 1699 was published by him "A Journey to London," after the method
of Dr. Martin Lister, who had published "A Journey to Paris."  And
in 1700 he satirised the Royal Society--at least, Sir Hans Sloane,
their president--in two dialogues, intituled "The Transactioner."

Though he was a regular advocate in the courts of civil and canon
law, he did not love his profession, nor, indeed, any kind of
business which interrupted his voluptuary dreams or forced him to
rouse from that indulgence in which only he could find delight.  His
reputation as a civilian was yet maintained by his judgments in the
Courts of Delegates, and raised very high by the address and
knowledge which he discovered in 1700, when he defended the Earl of
Anglesea against his lady, afterwards Duchess of Buckinghamshire,
who sued for a divorce and obtained it.

The expense of his pleasures, and neglect of business, had now
lessened his revenues; and he was willing to accept of a settlement
in Ireland, where, about 1702, he was made Judge of the Admiralty,
Commissioner of the Prizes, Keeper of the Records in Birmingham's
Tower, and Vicar-General to Dr. Marsh, the primate.

But it is vain to put wealth within the reach of him who will not
stretch out his hand to take it.  King soon found a friend, as idle
and thoughtless as himself, in Upton, one of the judges, who had a
pleasant house called Mountown, near Dublin, to which King
frequently retired; delighting to neglect his interest, forget his
cares, and desert his duty.

Here he wrote "Mully of Mountown," a poem; by which, though fanciful
readers in the pride of sagacity have given it a poetical
interpretation, was meant originally no more than it expressed, as
it was dictated only by the author's delight in the quiet of
Mountown.

In 1708, when Lord Wharton was sent to govern Ireland, King returned
to London, with his poverty, his idleness, and his wit; and
published some essays, called "Useful Transactions."  His "Voyage to
the Island of Cajamai" is particularly commended.  He then wrote the
"Art of Love," a poem remarkable, notwithstanding its title, for
purity of sentiment; and in 1709 imitated Horace in an "Art of
Cookery," which he published with some letters to Dr. Lister.

In 1710 he appeared as a lover of the Church, on the side of
Sacheverell; and was supposed to have concurred at least in the
projection of the Examiner.  His eyes were open to all the
operations of Whiggism; and he bestowed some strictures upon Dr.
Kennet's adulatory sermon at the funeral of the Duke of Devonshire.

"The History of the Heathen Gods," a book composed for schools, was
written by him in 1711.  The work is useful, but might have been
produced without the powers of King.  The same year he published
"Rufinus," an historical essay; and a poem intended to dispose the
nation to think as he thought of the Duke of Marlborough and his
adherents.

In 1711, competence, if not plenty, was again put into his power.
He was, without the trouble of attendance or the mortification of a
request, made Gazetteer.  Swift, Freind, Prior, and other men of the
same party, brought him the key of the Gazetteer's office.  He was
now again placed in a profitable employment, and again threw the
benefit away.  An Act of Insolvency made his business at that time
particularly troublesome; and he would not wait till hurry should be
at an end, but impatiently resigned it, and returned to his wonted
indigence and amusements.

One of his amusements at Lambeth, where he resided, was to mortify
Dr. Tenison, the archbishop, by a public festivity on the surrender
of Dunkirk to Hill; an event with which Tenison's political bigotry
did not suffer him to be delighted.  King was resolved to counteract
his sullenness, and at the expense of a few barrels of ale filled
the neighbourhood with honest merriment.

In the autumn of 1712 his health declined; he grew weaker by
degrees, and died on Christmas Day.  Though his life had not been
without irregularity, his principles were pure and orthodox, and his
death was pious.

After this relation it will be naturally supposed that his poems
were rather the amusements of idleness than efforts of study; that
he endeavoured rather to divert than astonish; that his thoughts
seldom aspired to sublimity; and that, if his verse was easy and his
images familiar, he attained what he desired.  His purpose is to be
merry; but perhaps, to enjoy his mirth, it may be sometimes
necessary to think well of his opinions.



HALIFAX.



The life of the Earl of Halifax was properly that of an artful and
active statesman, employed in balancing parties, contriving
expedients, and combating opposition, and exposed to the
vicissitudes of advancement and degradation; but in this collection
poetical merit is the claim to attention; and the account which is
here to be expected may properly be proportioned, not to his
influence in the State, but to his rank among the writers of verse.

Charles Montague was born April 16, 1661, at Horton, in
Northamptonshire, the son of Mr. George Montague, a younger son of
the Earl of Manchester.  He was educated first in the country, and
then removed to Westminster, where, in 1677, he was chosen a King's
Scholar, and recommended himself to Busby by his felicity in
extemporary epigrams.  He contracted a very intimate friendship with
Mr. Stepney; and in 1682, when Stepney was elected at Cambridge, the
election of Montague being not to proceed till the year following,
he was afraid lest by being placed at Oxford he might be separated
from his companion, and therefore solicited to be removed to
Cambridge, without waiting for the advantages of another year.

It seemed indeed time to wish for a removal, for he was already a
schoolboy of one-and-twenty.

His relation, Dr. Montague, was then Master of the college in which
he was placed a Fellow-Commoner, and took him under his particular
care.  Here he commenced an acquaintance with the great Newton,
which continued through his life, and was at last attested by a
legacy.

In 1685 his verses on the death of King Charles made such an
impression on the Earl of Dorset that he was invited to town, and
introduced by that universal patron to the other wits.  In 1687 he
joined with Prior in "The City Mouse and the Country Mouse," a
burlesque of Dryden's "Hind and Panther."  He signed the invitation
to the Prince of Orange, and sat in the Convention.  He about the
same time married the Countess Dowager of Manchester, and intended
to have taken Orders; but, afterwards altering his purpose, he
purchased for 1,500 pounds the place of one of the clerks of the
Council.

After he had written his epistle on the victory of the Boyne, his
patron Dorset introduced him to King William with this expression,
"Sir, I have brought a MOUSE to wait on your Majesty."  To which the
King is said to have replied, "You do well to put me in the way of
making a MAN of him;" and ordered him a pension of 500 pounds.  This
story, however current, seems to have been made after the event.
The King's answer implies a greater acquaintance with our proverbial
and familiar diction than King William could possibly have attained.

In 1691, being member of the House of Commons, he argued warmly in
favour of a law to grant the assistance of counsel in trials for
high treason; and in the midst of his speech falling into some
confusion, was for a while silent; but, recovering himself,
observed, "how reasonable it was to allow counsel to men called as
criminals before a court of justice, when it appeared how much the
presence of that assembly could disconcert one of their own body."

After this he rose fast into honours and employments, being made one
of the Commissioners of the Treasury, and called to the Privy
Council.  In 1694 he became Chancellor of the Exchequer; and the
next year engaged in the great attempt of the recoinage, which was
in two years happily completed.  In 1696 he projected the GENERAL
FUND and raised the credit of the Exchequer; and after inquiry
concerning a grant of Irish Crown lands, it was determined by a vote
of the Commons that Charles Montague, Esq., HAD DESERVED HIS
MAJESTY'S FAVOUR.  In 1698, being advanced to the first Commission
of the Treasury, he was appointed one of the regency in the King's
absence:  the next year he was made Auditor of the Exchequer, and
the year after created Baron Halifax.  He was, however, impeached by
the Commons; but the Articles were dismissed by the Lords.

At the accession of Queen Anne he was dismissed from the Council;
and in the first Parliament of her reign was again attacked by the
Commons, and again escaped by the protection of the Lords.  In 1704
he wrote an answer to Bromley's speech against occasional
conformity.  He headed the inquiry into the danger of the Church.
In 1706 he proposed and negotiated the Union with Scotland; and when
the Elector of Hanover received the Garter, after the Act had passed
for securing the Protestant Succession, he was appointed to carry
the ensigns of the Order to the Electoral Court.  He sat as one of
the judges of Sacheverell, but voted for a mild sentence.  Being now
no longer in favour, he contrived to obtain a writ for summoning the
Electoral Prince to Parliament as Duke of Cambridge.

At the Queen's death he was appointed one of the regents; and at the
accession of George I. was made Earl of Halifax, Knight of the
Garter, and First Commissioner of the Treasury, with a grant to his
nephew of the reversion of the Auditorship of the Exchequer.  More
was not to be had, and this he kept but a little while; for on the
19th of May, 1715, he died of an inflammation of his lungs.

Of him, who from a poet became a patron of poets, it will be readily
believed that the works would not miss of celebration.  Addison
began to praise him early, and was followed or accompanied by other
poets; perhaps by almost all, except Swift and Pope, who forbore to
flatter him in his life, and after his death spoke of him--Swift
with slight censure, and Pope, in the character of Bufo, with
acrimonious contempt.

He was, as Pope says, "fed with dedications;" for Tickell affirms
that no dedication was unrewarded.  To charge all unmerited praise
with the guilt of flattery, and to suppose that the encomiast always
knows and feels the falsehoods of his assertions, is surely to
discover great ignorance of human nature and human life.  In
determinations depending not on rules, but on experience and
comparison, judgment is always in some degree subject to affection.
Very near to admiration is the wish to admire.

Every man willingly gives value to the praise which he receives, and
considers the sentence passed in his favour as the sentence of
discernment.  We admire in a friend that understanding that selected
us for confidence; we admire more, in a patron, that judgment which,
instead of scattering bounty indiscriminately, directed it to us;
and, if the patron be an author, those performances which gratitude
forbids us to blame, affection will easily dispose us to exalt.

To these prejudices, hardly culpable, interest adds a power always
operating, though not always, because not willingly, perceived.  The
modesty of praise wears gradually away; and perhaps the pride of
patronage may be in time so increased that modest praise will no
longer please.

Many a blandishment was practised upon Halifax which he would never
have known had he no other attractions than those of his poetry, of
which a short time has withered the beauties.  It would now be
esteemed no honour, by a contributor to the monthly bundles of
verses, to be told that, in strains either familiar or solemn, he
sings like Montague.



PARNELL.



The life of Dr. Parnell is a task which I should very willingly
decline, since it has been lately written by Goldsmith, a man of
such variety of powers, and such felicity of performance, that he
always seemed to do best that which he was doing; a man who had the
art of being minute without tediousness, and general without
confusion; whose language was copious without exuberance, exact
without constraint, and easy without weakness.

What such an author has told, who would tell again?  I have made an
abstract from his larger narrative; and have this gratification from
my attempt, that it gives me an opportunity of paying due tribute to
the memory of Goldsmith.

Thomas Parnell was the son of a Commonwealthsman of the same name,
who, at the Restoration, left Congleton, in Cheshire, where the
family had been established for several centuries, and, settling in
Ireland, purchased an estate, which, with his lands in Cheshire,
descended to the poet, who was born at Dublin in 1679; and, after
the usual education at a grammar school, was, at the age of
thirteen, admitted into the College where, in 1700, he became Master
of Arts; and was the same year ordained a deacon, though under the
canonical age, by a dispensation from the Bishop of Derry.

About three years afterwards he was made a priest and in 1705 Dr.
Ashe, the Bishop of Clogher, conferred upon him the archdeaconry of
Clogher.  About the same time he married Mrs. Anne Minchin, an
amiable lady, by whom he had two sons, who died young, and a
daughter, who long survived him.

At the ejection of the Whigs, in the end of Queen Anne's reign,
Parnell was persuaded to change his party, not without much censure
from those whom he forsook, and was received by the new Ministry as
a valuable reinforcement.  When the Earl of Oxford was told that Dr.
Parnell waited among the crowd in the outer room, he went, by the
persuasion of Swift, with his Treasurer's staff in his hand, to
inquire for him, and to bid him welcome; and, as may be inferred
from Pope's dedication, admitted him as a favourite companion to his
convivial hours, but, as it seems often to have happened in those
times to the favourites of the great, without attention to his
fortune, which, however, was in no great need of improvement.

Parnell, who did not want ambition or vanity, was desirous to make
himself conspicuous, and to show how worthy he was of high
preferment.  As he thought himself qualified to become a popular
preacher, he displayed his elocution with great success in the
pulpits of London; but the Queen's death putting an end to his
expectations, abated his diligence; and Pope represents him as
falling from that time into intemperance of wine.  That in his
latter life he was too much a lover of the bottle, is not denied;
but I have heard it imputed to a cause more likely to obtain
forgiveness from mankind, the untimely death of a darling son; or,
as others tell, the loss of his wife, who died (1712) in the midst
of his expectations.

He was now to derive every future addition to his preferments from
his personal interest with his private friends, and he was not long
unregarded.  He was warmly recommended by Swift to Archbishop King,
who gave him a prebend in 1713; and in May, 1716, presented him to
the vicarage of Finglass, in the diocese of Dublin, worth 400 pounds
a year.  Such notice from such a man inclines me to believe that the
vice of which he has been accused was not gross or not notorious.

But his prosperity did not last long.  His end, whatever was its
cause, was now approaching.  He enjoyed his preferment little more
than a year; for in July, 1717, in his thirty-eighth year, he died
at Chester on his way to Ireland.

He seems to have been one of those poets who take delight in
writing.  He contributed to the papers of that time, and probably
published more than he owned.  He left many compositions behind him,
of which Pope selected those which he thought best, and dedicated
them to the Earl of Oxford.  Of these Goldsmith has given an
opinion, and his criticism it is seldom safe to contradict.  He
bestows just praise upon "The Rise of Woman," "The Fairy Tale," and
"The Pervigilium Veneris;" but has very properly remarked that in
"The Battle of Mice and Frogs" the Greek names have not in English
their original effect.  He tells us that "The Bookworm" is borrowed
from Beza; but he should have added with modern applications:  and
when he discovers that "Gay Bacchus" is translated from Augurellus,
he ought to have remarked that the latter part is purely Parnell's.
Another poem, "When Spring Comes On," is, he says, taken from the
French.  I would add that the description of "Barrenness," in his
verses to Pope, was borrowed from Secundus; but lately searching for
the passage which I had formerly read, I could not find it.  "The
Night Piece on Death" is indirectly preferred by Goldsmith to Gray's
"Churchyard;" but, in my opinion, Gray has the advantage in dignity,
variety, and originality of sentiment.  He observes that the story
of "The Hermit" is in More's "Dialogues" and Howell's "Letters," and
supposes it to have been originally Arabian.

Goldsmith has not taken any notice of "The Elegy to the Old Beauty,"
which is perhaps the meanest; nor of "The Allegory on Man," the
happiest of Parnell's performances.  The hint of "The Hymn to
Contentment" I suspect to have been borrowed from Cleveland.

The general character of Parnell is not great extent of
comprehension or fertility of mind.  Of the little that appears,
still less is his own.  His praise must be derived from the easy
sweetness of his diction:  in his verses there is more happiness
than pains; he is sprightly without effort, and always delights,
though he never ravishes; everything is proper, yet everything seems
casual.  If there is some appearance of elaboration in "The Hermit,"
the narrative, as it is less airy, is less pleasing.  Of his other
compositions it is impossible to say whether they are the
productions of nature, so excellent as not to want the help of art,
or of art so refined as to resemble nature.

This criticism relates only to the pieces published by Pope.  Of the
large appendages which I find in the last edition, I can only say
that I know not whence they came, nor have ever inquired whither
they are going.  They stand upon the faith of the compilers.



GARTH.



Samuel Garth was of a good family in Yorkshire, and from some school
in his own county became a student at Peter House, in Cambridge,
where he resided till he became Doctor of Physic on July the 7th,
1691.  He was examined before the College at London on March the
12th, 1691-2, and admitted Fellow June 26th, 1693.  He was soon so
much distinguished by his conversation and accomplishments as to
obtain very extensive practice; and, if a pamphlet of those times
may be credited, had the favour and confidence of one party, as
Radcliffe had of the other.  He is always mentioned as a man of
benevolence; and it is just to suppose that his desire of helping
the helpless disposed him to so much zeal for "The Dispensary;" an
undertaking of which some account, however short, is proper to be
given.

Whether what Temple says be true, that physicians have had more
learning than the other faculties, I will not stay to inquire; but I
believe every man has found in physicians great liberality and
dignity of sentiment, very prompt effusion of beneficence, and
willingness to exert a lucrative art where there is no hope of
lucre.  Agreeably to this character, the College of Physicians, in
July, 1687, published an edict, requiring all the Fellows,
Candidates, and Licentiates to give gratuitous advice to the
neighbouring poor.  This edict was sent to the Court of Aldermen;
and, a question being made to whom the appellation of the POOR
should be extended, the College answered that it should be
sufficient to bring a testimonial from the clergyman officiating in
the parish where the patient resided.

After a year's experience the physicians found their charity
frustrated by some malignant opposition, and made to a great degree
vain by the high price of physic; they therefore voted, in August,
1688, that the laboratory of the College should be accommodated to
the preparation of medicines, and another room prepared for their
reception; and that the contributors to the expense should manage
the charity.

It was now expected that the apothecaries would have undertaken the
care of providing medicines; but they took another course.  Thinking
the whole design pernicious to their interest, they endeavoured to
raise a faction against it in the College, and found some physicians
mean enough to solicit their patronage by betraying to them the
counsels of the College.  The greater part, however, enforced by a
new edict, in 1694, the former order of 1687, and sent it to the
Mayor and Aldermen, who appointed a committee to treat with the
College and settle the mode of administering the charity.

It was desired by the aldermen that the testimonials of
churchwardens and overseers should be admitted; and that all hired
servants, and all apprentices to handicraftsmen, should be
considered as POOR.  This likewise was granted by the College.

It was then considered who should distribute the medicines, and who
should settle their prices.  The physicians procured some
apothecaries to undertake the dispensation, and offered that the
warden and company of the apothecaries should adjust the price.
This offer was rejected; and the apothecaries who had engaged to
assist the charity were considered as traitors to the company,
threatened with the imposition of troublesome offices, and deterred
from the performance of their engagements.  The apothecaries
ventured upon public opposition, and presented a kind of
remonstrance against the design to the committee of the City, which
the physicians condescended to confute:  and at last the traders
seem to have prevailed among the sons of trade; for the proposal of
the College having been considered, a paper of approbation was drawn
up, but postponed and forgotten.

The physicians still persisted; and in 1696 a subscription was
raised by themselves according to an agreement prefixed to "The
Dispensary."  The poor were, for a time, supplied with medicines;
for how long a time I know not.  The medicinal charity, like others,
began with ardour, but soon remitted, and at last died gradually
away.

About the time of the subscription begins the action of "The
Dispensary."  The poem, as its subject was present and popular, co-
operated with passions and prejudices then prevalent, and, with such
auxiliaries to its intrinsic merit, was universally and liberally
applauded.  It was on the side of charity against the intrigues of
interest; and of regular learning against licentious usurpation of
medical authority, and was therefore naturally favoured by those who
read and can judge of poetry.

In 1697 Garth spoke that which is now called "The Harveian Oration;"
which the authors of "The Biographia" mention with more praise than
the passage quoted in their notes will fully justify.  Garth,
speaking of the mischiefs done by quacks, has these expressions:
"Non tamen telis vulnerat ista agyrtarum colluvies, sed theriaca
quadam magis perniciosa, non pyrio, sed pulvere nescio quo exotico
certat, non globulis plumbeis, sed pilulis aeque lethalibus
interficit."  This was certainly thought fine by the author, and is
still admired by his biographer.  In October, 1702, he became one of
the censors of the College,

Garth, being an active and zealous Whig, was a member of the Kit-Cat
Club, and, by consequence, familiarly known to all the great men of
that denomination.  In 1710, when the government fell into other
hands, he writ to Lord Godolphin, on his dismission, a short poem,
which was criticised in the Examiner, and so successfully either
defended or excused by Mr. Addison that, for the sake of the
vindication, it ought to be preserved.

At the accession of the present family his merits were acknowledged
and rewarded.  He was knighted with the sword of his hero,
Marlborough; and was made Physician-in-Ordinary to the King, and
Physician-General to the army.  He then undertook an edition of
Ovid's "Metamorphoses," translated by several hands; which he
recommended by a preface, written with more ostentation than
ability; his notions are half-formed, and his materials
immethodically confused.  This was his last work.  He died January
18th, 1717-18, and was buried at Harrow-on-the-Hill.

His personal character seems to have been social and liberal.  He
communicated himself through a very wide extent of acquaintance; and
though firm in a party, at a time when firmness included virulence,
yet he imparted his kindness to those who were not supposed to
favour his principles.  He was an early encourager of Pope, and was
at once the friend of Addison and of Granville.  He is accused of
voluptuousness and irreligion; and Pope, who says that "if ever
there was a good Christian, without knowing himself to be so, it was
Dr. Garth," seems not able to deny what he is angry to hear and loth
to confess.

Pope afterwards declared himself convinced that Garth died in the
communion of the Church of Rome, having been privately reconciled.
It is observed by Lowth that there is less distance than is thought
between scepticism and Popery; and that a mind wearied with
perpetual doubt, willingly seeks repose in the bosom of an
infallible Church.

His poetry has been praised at least equally to its merit.  In "The
Dispensary" there is a strain of smooth and free versification; but
few lines are eminently elegant.  No passages fall below mediocrity,
and few rise much above it.  The plan seems formed without just
proportion to the subject; the means and end have no necessary
connection.  Resnel, in his preface to Pope's Essay, remarks that
Garth exhibits no discrimination of characters; and that what any
one says might, with equal propriety, have been said by another.
The general design is, perhaps, open to criticism; but the
composition can seldom be charged with inaccuracy or negligence.
The author never slumbers in self-indulgence; his full vigour is
always exerted; scarcely a line is left unfinished; nor is it easy
to find an expression used by constraint, or a thought imperfectly
expressed.  It was remarked by Pope, that "The Dispensary" had been
corrected in every edition, and that every change was an
improvement.  It appears, however, to want something of poetical
ardour, and something of general delectation; and therefore, since
it has been no longer supported by accidental and intrinsic
popularity, it has been scarcely able to support itself.



ROWE.



Nicholas Rowe was born at Little Beckford, in Bedfordshire, in 1673.
His family had long possessed a considerable estate, with a good
house, at Lambertoun in Devonshire.  The ancestor from whom he
descended in a direct line received the arms borne by his
descendants for his bravery in the Holy War.  His father, John Rowe,
who was the first that quitted his paternal acres to practise any
part of profit, professed the law, and published Benlow's and
Dallison's Reports in the reign of James the Second, when, in
opposition to the notions then diligently propagated of dispensing
power, he ventured to remark how low his authors rated the
prerogative.  He was made a serjeant, and died April 30, 1692.  He
was buried in the Temple church.

Nicholas was first sent to a private school at Highgate; and, being
afterwards removed to Westminster, was at twelve years chosen one of
the King's Scholars.  His master was Busby, who suffered none of his
scholars to let their powers lie useless; and his exercises in
several languages are said to have been written with uncommon
degrees of excellence, and yet to have cost him very little labour.
At sixteen he had, in his father's opinion, made advances in
learning sufficient to qualify him for the study of law, and was
entered a student of the Middle Temple, where for some time he read
statutes and reports with proficiency proportionate to the force of
his mind, which was already such that he endeavoured to comprehend
law, not as a series of precedents, or collection of positive
precepts, but as a system of rational government and impartial
justice.  When he was nineteen, he was, by the death of his father,
left more to his own direction, and probably from that time suffered
law gradually to give way to poetry.  At twenty-five he produced the
Ambitious Step-Mother, which was received with so much favour that
he devoted himself from that time wholly to elegant literature.

His next tragedy (1702) was Tamerlane, in which, under the name of
Tamerlane, he intended to characterise King William, and Louis the
Fourteenth under Bajazet.  The virtues of Tamerlane seem to have
been arbitrarily assigned him by his poet, for I know not that
history gives any other qualities than those which make a conqueror.
The fashion, however, of the time was to accumulate upon Louis all
that can raise horror and detestation; and whatever good was
withheld from him, that it might not be thrown away was bestowed
upon King William.  This was the tragedy which Rowe valued most, and
that which probably, by the help of political auxiliaries, excited
most applause; but occasional poetry must often content itself with
occasional praise.  Tamerlane has for a long time been acted only
once a year, on the night when King William landed.  Our quarrel
with Louis has been long over; and it now gratifies neither zeal nor
malice to see him painted with aggravated features, like a Saracen
upon a sign.

The Fair Penitent, his next production (1703), is one of the most
pleasing tragedies on the stage, where it still keeps its turns of
appearing, and probably will long keep them, for there is scarcely
any work of any poet at once so interesting by the fable, and so
delightful by the language.  The story is domestic, and therefore
easily received by the imagination, and assimilated to common life;
the diction is exquisitely harmonious, and soft or sprightly as
occasion requires.

The character of Lothario seems to have been expanded by Richardson
into Lovelace; but he has excelled his original in the moral effect
of the fiction.  Lothario, with gaiety which cannot be hated, and
bravery which cannot be despised, retains too much of the
spectator's kindness.  It was in the power of Richardson alone to
teach us at once esteem and detestation, to make virtuous resentment
overpower all the benevolence which wit, elegance, and courage,
naturally excite; and to lose at last the hero in the villain.  The
fifth act is not equal to the former; the events of the drama are
exhausted, and little remains but to talk of what is past.  It has
been observed that the title of the play does not sufficiently
correspond with the behaviour of Calista, who at last shows no
evident signs of repentance, but may be reasonably suspected of
feeling pain from detection rather than from guilt, and expresses
more shame than sorrow, and more rage than shame.

His next (1706) was Ulysses; which, with the common fate of
mythological stories, is now generally neglected.  We have been too
early acquainted with the poetical heroes to expect any pleasure
from their revival; to show them as they have already been shown, is
to disgust by repetition; to give them new qualities, or new
adventures, is to offend by violating received notions.

"The Royal Convert" (1708) seems to have a better claim to
longevity.  The fable is drawn from an obscure and barbarous age, to
which fictions are more easily and properly adapted; for when
objects are imperfectly seen, they easily take forms from
imagination.  The scene lies among our ancestors in our own country,
and therefore very easily catches attention.  Rodogune is a
personage truly tragical, of high spirit, and violent passions,
great with tempestuous dignity, and wicked with a soul that would
have been heroic if it had been virtuous.  The motto seems to tell
that this play was not successful.

Rowe does not always remember what his characters require.  In
Tamerlane there is some ridiculous mention of the God of Love; and
Rodogune, a savage Saxon, talks of Venus and the eagle that bears
the thunder of Jupiter.

This play discovers its own date, by a prediction of the Union, in
imitation of Cranmer's prophetic promises to Henry VIII.  The
anticipated blessings of union are not very naturally introduced,
nor very happily expressed.  He once (1706) tried to change his
hand.  He ventured on a comedy, and produced the Biter, with which,
though it was unfavourably treated by the audience, he was himself
delighted; for he is said to have sat in the house laughing with
great vehemence, whenever he had, in his own opinion, produced a
jest.  But finding that he and the public had no sympathy of mirth,
he tried at lighter scenes no more.

After the Royal Convert (1714) appeared Jane Shore, written, as its
author professes, IN IMITATION OF SHAKESPEARE'S STYLE.  In what he
thought himself an imitator of Shakespeare it is not easy to
conceive.  The numbers, the diction, the sentiments, and the
conduct, everything in which imitation can consist, are remote in
the utmost degree from the manner of Shakespeare, whose dramas it
resembles only as it is an English story, and as some of the persons
have their names in history.  This play, consisting chiefly of
domestic scenes and private distress, lays hold upon the heart.  The
wife is forgiven because she repents, and the husband is honoured
because he forgives.  This, therefore, is one of those pieces which
we still welcome on the stage.

His last tragedy (1715) was Lady Jane Grey.  This subject had been
chosen by Mr. Smith, whose papers were put into Rowe's hands such as
he describes them in his preface.  This play has likewise sunk into
oblivion.  From this time he gave nothing more to the stage.

Being by a competent fortune exempted from any necessity of
combating his inclination, he never wrote in distress, and therefore
does not appear to have ever written in haste.  His works were
finished to his own approbation, and bear few marks of negligence or
hurry.  It is remarkable that his prologues and epilogues are all
his own, though he sometimes supplied others; he afforded help, but
did not solicit it.

As his studies necessarily made him acquainted with Shakespeare, and
acquaintance produced veneration, he undertook (1709) an edition of
his works, from which he neither received much praise, nor seems to
have expected it; yet I believe those who compare it with former
copies will find that he has done more than he promised; and that,
without the pomp of notes or boasts of criticism, many passages are
happily restored.  He prefixed a life of the author, such as
tradition, then almost expiring, could supply, and a preface, which
cannot be said to discover much profundity or penetration.  He at
least contributed to the popularity of his author.  He was willing
enough to improve his fortune by other arts than poetry.  He was
under-secretary for three years when the Duke of Queensberry was
Secretary of State, and afterwards applied to the Earl of Oxford for
some public employment.  Oxford enjoined him to study Spanish; and
when, some time afterwards, he came again, and said that he had
mastered it, dismissed him with this congratulation, "Then, sir, I
envy you the pleasure of reading 'Don Quixote' in the original."

This story is sufficiently attested; but why Oxford, who desired to
be thought a favourer of literature, should thus insult a man of
acknowledged merit, or how Rowe, who was so keen a Whig that he did
not willingly converse with men of the opposite party, could ask
preferment from Oxford, it is not now possible to discover.  Pope,
who told the story, did not say on what occasion the advice was
given; and, though he owned Rowe's disappointment, doubted whether
any injury was intended him, but thought it rather Lord Oxford's ODD
WAY.

It is likely that he lived on discontented through the rest of Queen
Anne's reign; but the time came at last when he found kinder
friends.  At the accession of King George he was made Poet-Laureate-
-I am afraid, by the ejection of poor Nahum Tate, who (1716) died in
the Mint, where he was forced to seek shelter by extreme poverty.
He was made likewise one of the land-surveyors of the customs of the
Port of London.  The Prince of Wales chose him Clerk of his Council;
and the Lord Chancellor Parker, as soon as he received the seals,
appointed him, unasked, Secretary of the Presentations.  Such an
accumulation of employments undoubtedly produced a very considerable
revenue.

Having already translated some parts of Lucan's "Pharsalia," which
had been published in the Miscellanies, and doubtless received many
praises, he undertook a version of the whole work, which he lived to
finish, but not to publish.  It seems to have been printed under the
care of Dr. Welwood, who prefixed the author's life, in which is
contained the following character:--

"As to his person, it was graceful and well made; his face regular,
and of a manly beauty.  As his soul was well lodged, so its rational
and animal faculties excelled in a high degree.  He had a quick and
fruitful invention, a deep penetration, and a large compass of
thought, with singular dexterity and easiness in making his thoughts
to be understood.  He was master of most parts of polite learning,
especially the classical authors, both Greek and Latin; understood
the French, Italian, and Spanish languages, and spoke the first
fluently, and the other two tolerably well.  He had likewise read
most of the Greek and Roman histories in their original languages,
and most that are wrote in English, French, Italian, and Spanish.
He had a good taste in philosophy; and, having a firm impression of
religion upon his mind, he took great delight in divinity and
ecclesiastical history, in both of which he made great advances in
the times he retired into the country, which was frequent.  He
expressed on all occasions his full persuasion of the truth of
revealed religion; and, being a sincere member of the Established
Church himself, he pitied, but condemned not, those that dissented
from it.  He abhorred the principles of persecuting men upon the
account of their opinions in religion; and, being strict in his own,
he took it not upon him to censure those of another persuasion.  His
conversation was pleasant, witty, and learned, without the least
tincture of affectation or pedantry; and his inimitable manner of
diverting and enlivening the company made it impossible for any one
to be out of humour when he was in it.  Envy and detraction seemed
to be entirely foreign to his constitution; and whatever
provocations he met with at any time, he passed them over without
the least thought of resentment or revenge.  As Homer had a Zoilus,
so Mr. Rowe had sometimes his; for there were not wanting malevolent
people, and pretenders to poetry too, that would now and then bark
at his best performances; but he was so conscious of his own genius,
and had so much good-nature, as to forgive them, nor could he ever
be tempted to return them an answer.

"The love of learning and poetry made him not the less fit for
business, and nobody applied himself closer to it when it required
his attendance.  The late Duke of Queensberry, when he was Secretary
of State, made him his secretary for public affairs; and when that
truly great man came to know him well, he was never so pleased as
when Mr. Rowe was in his company.  After the duke's death, all
avenues were stopped to his preferment; and during the rest of that
reign he passed his time with the Muses and his books, and sometimes
the conversation of his friends.  When he had just got to be easy in
his fortune, and was in a fair way to make it better, death swept
him away, and in him deprived the world of one of the best men, as
well as one of the best geniuses, of the age.  He died like a
Christian and a philosopher, in charity with all mankind, and with
an absolute resignation to the will of God.  He kept up his good-
humour to the last; and took leave of his wife and friends,
immediately before his last agony, with the same tranquillity of
mind, and the same indifference for life, as though he had been upon
taking but a short journey.  He was twice married--first to a
daughter of Mr. Parsons, one of the auditors of the revenue; and
afterwards to a daughter of Mr. Devenish, of a good family in
Dorsetshire.  By the first he had a son; and by the second a
daughter, married afterwards to Mr. Fane.  He died 6th December,
1718, in the forty-fifth year of his age, and was buried on the 19th
of the same month in Westminster Abbey, in the aisle where many of
our English poets are interred, over against Chaucer, his body being
attended by a select number of his friends, and the dean and choir
officiating at the funeral."

To this character, which is apparently given with the fondness of a
friend, may be added the testimony of Pope, who says, in a letter to
Blount, "Mr. Rowe accompanied me, and passed a week in the Forest.
I need not tell you how much a man of his turn entertained me; but I
must acquaint you, there is a vivacity and gaiety of disposition,
almost peculiar to him, which make it impossible to part from him
without that uneasiness which generally succeeds all our pleasure."

Pope has left behind him another mention of his companion less
advantageous, which is thus reported by Dr. Warburton:--

"Rowe, in Mr. Pope's opinion, maintained a decent character, but had
no heart.  Mr. Addison was justly offended with some behaviour which
arose from that want, and estranged himself from him, which Rowe
felt very severely.  Mr. Pope, their common friend, knowing this,
took an opportunity, at some juncture of Mr. Addison's advancement,
to tell him how poor Rowe was grieved at his displeasure, and what
satisfaction he expressed at Mr. Addison's good fortune, which he
expressed so naturally that he (Mr. Pope) could not but think him
sincere.  Mr.  Addison replied, 'I do not suspect that he feigned;
but the levity of his heart is such, that he is struck with any new
adventure, and it would affect him just in the same manner if he
heard I was going to be hanged.'  Mr. Pope said he could not deny
but Mr. Addison understood Rowe well."

This censure time has not left us the power of confirming or
refuting; but observation daily shows that much stress is not to be
laid on hyperbolical accusations and pointed sentences, which even
he that utters them desires to be applauded rather than credited.
Addison can hardly be supposed to have meant all that he said.  Few
characters can bear the microscopic scrutiny of wit quickened by
anger; and, perhaps, the best advice to authors would be, that they
should keep out of the way of one another.

Rowe is chiefly to be considered as a tragic writer and a
translator.  In his attempt at comedy he failed so ignominiously
that his Biter is not inserted in his works:  and his occasional
poems and short compositions are rarely worthy either praise or
censure, for they seem the casual sports of a mind seeking rather to
amuse its leisure than to exercise its powers.  In the construction
of his dramas there is not much art; he is not a nice observer of
the unities.  He extends time and varies places as his convenience
requires.  To vary the place is not, in my opinion, any violation of
nature, if the change be made between the acts, for it is no less
easy for the spectator to suppose himself at Athens in the second
act, than at Thebes in the first; but to change the scene, as is
done by Rowe, in the middle of an act, is to add more acts to the
play, since an act is so much of the business as is transacted
without interruption.  Rowe, by this licence, easily extricates
himself from difficulties; as in Jane Grey, when we have been
terrified with all the dreadful pomp of public execution; and are
wondering how the heroine or the poet will proceed, no sooner has
Jane pronounced some prophetic rhymes than--pass and be gone--the
scene closes, and Pembroke and Gardiner are turned out upon the
stage.

I know not that there can be found in his plays any deep search into
nature, any accurate discriminations of kindred qualities, or nice
display of passion in its progress; all is general and undefined.
Nor does he much interest or affect the auditor, except in Jane
Shore, who is always seen and heard with pity.  Alicia is a
character of empty noise, with no resemblance to real sorrow or to
natural madness.

Whence, then, has Rowe his reputation?  From the reasonableness and
propriety of some of his scenes, from the elegance of his diction,
and the suavity of his verse.  He seldom moves either pity or
terror, but he often elevates the sentiments; he seldom pierces the
breast, but he always delights the ear, and often improves the
understanding.  His translation of the "Golden Verses," and of the
first book of Quillet's poem, have nothing in them remarkable.  The
"Golden Verses" are tedious.

The version of Lucan is one of the greatest productions of English
poetry, for there is perhaps none that so completely exhibits the
genius and spirit of the original.  Lucan is distinguished by a kind
of dictatorial or philosophic dignity, rather, as Quintilian
observes, declamatory than poetical; full of ambitious morality and
pointed sentences, comprised in vigorous and animated lines.  This
character Rowe has very diligently and successfully preserved.  His
versification, which is such as his contemporaries practised,
without any attempt at innovation or improvement, seldom wants
either melody or force.  His author's sense is sometimes a little
diluted by additional infusions, and sometimes weakened by too much
expansion.  But such faults are to be expected in all translations,
from the constraint of measures and dissimilitude of languages.  The
"Pharsalia" of Rowe deserves more notice than it obtains, and as it
is more read will be more esteemed.



GAY.



John Gay, descended from an old family that had been long in
possession of the manor of Goldworthy, in Devonshire, was born in
1688, at or near Barnstaple, where he was educated by Mr. Luck, who
taught the school of that town with good reputation, and, a little
before he retired from it, published a volume of Latin and English
verses.  Under such a master he was likely to form a taste for
poetry.  Being born without prospect of hereditary riches, he was
sent to London in his youth, and placed apprentice with a silk
mercer.  How long he continued behind the counter, or with what
degree of softness and dexterity he received and accommodated the
ladies, as he probably took no delight in telling it, is not known.
The report is that he was soon weary of either the restraint or
servility of his occupation, and easily persuaded his master to
discharge him.

The Duchess of Monmouth, remarkable for inflexible perseverance in
her demand to be treated as a princess, in 1712 took Gay into her
service as secretary:  by quitting a shop for such service he might
gain leisure, but he certainly advanced little in the boast of
independence.  Of his leisure he made so good use that he published
next year a poem on "Rural Sports," and inscribed it to Mr. Pope,
who was then rising fast into reputation.  Pope was pleased with the
honour, and when he became acquainted with Gay, found such
attractions in his manners and conversation that he seems to have
received him into his inmost confidence; and a friendship was formed
between them which lasted to their separation by death, without any
known abatement on either part.  Gay was the general favourite of
the whole association of wits; but they regarded him as a playfellow
rather than a partner, and treated him with more fondness than
respect.

Next year he published "The Shepherd's Week," six English pastorals,
in which the images are drawn from real life, such as it appears
among the rustics in parts of England remote from London.  Steele,
in some papers of the Guardian, had praised Ambrose Philips as the
pastoral writer that yielded only to Theocritus, Virgil, and
Spenser.  Pope, who had also published pastorals, not pleased to be
overlooked, drew up a comparison of his own compositions with those
of Philips, in which he covertly gave himself the preference, while
he seemed to disown it.  Not content with this, he is supposed to
have incited Gay to write "The Shepherd's Week," to show that, if it
be necessary to copy nature with minuteness, rural life must be
exhibited such as grossness and ignorance have made it.  So far the
plan was reasonable; but the pastorals are introduced by a Proeme,
written with such imitation as they could attain of obsolete
language, and, by consequence, in a style that was never spoken nor
written in any language or in any place.  But the effect of reality
and truth became conspicuous, even when the intention was to show
them grovelling and degraded.  These pastorals became popular, and
were read with delight as just representations of rural manners and
occupations by those who had no interest in the rivalry of the
poets, nor knowledge of the critical dispute.

In 1713 he brought a comedy called The Wife of Bath upon the stage,
but it received no applause; he printed it, however, and seventeen
years after, having altered it and, as he thought, adapted it more
to the public taste, he offered it again to the town; but, though he
was flushed with the success of the Beggar's Opera, had the
mortification to see it again rejected.

In the last year of Queen Anne's life Gay was made secretary to the
Earl of Clarendon, Ambassador to the Court of Hanover.  This was a
station that naturally gave him hopes of kindness from every party;
but the Queen's death put an end to her favours, and he had
dedicated his "Shepherd's Week" to Bolingbroke, which Swift
considered as the crime that obstructed all kindness from the House
of Hanover.  He did not, however, omit to improve the right which
his office had given him to the notice of the Royal Family.  On the
arrival of the Princess of Wales he wrote a poem, and obtained so
much favour that both the Prince and the Princess went to see his
What D'ye Call It, a kind of mock tragedy, in which the images were
comic and the action grave; so that, as Pope relates, Mr. Cromwell,
who could not hear what was said, was at a loss how to reconcile the
laughter of the audience with the solemnity of the scene.

Of this performance the value certainly is but little; but it was
one of the lucky trifles that give pleasure by novelty, and was so
much favoured by the audience that envy appeared against it in the
form of criticism; and Griffin, a player, in conjunction with Mr.
Theobald, a man afterwards more remarkable, produced a pamphlet
called "The Key to the What D'ye Call It," "which," says Gay, "calls
me a blockhead, and Mr. Pope a knave."

But fortune has always been inconstant.  Not long afterwards (1717)
he endeavoured to entertain the town with Three Hours after
Marriage, a comedy written, as there is sufficient reason for
believing, by the joint assistance of Pope and Arbuthnot.  One
purpose of it was to bring into contempt Dr. Woodward, the
fossilist, a man not really or justly contemptible.  It had the fate
which such outrages deserve.  The scene in which Woodward was
directly and apparently ridiculed, by the introduction of a mummy
and a crocodile, disgusted the audience, and the performance was
driven off the stage with general condemnation.

Gay is represented as a man easily incited to hope, and deeply
depressed when his hopes were disappointed.  This is not the
character of a hero, but it may naturally imply something more
generally welcome, a soft and civil companion.  Whoever is apt to
hope good from others is diligent to please them; but he that
believes his powers strong enough to force their own way, commonly
tries only to please himself.  He had been simple enough to imagine
that those who laughed at the What D'ye Call It would raise the
fortune of its author, and, finding nothing done, sunk into
dejection.  His friends endeavoured to divert him.  The Earl of
Burlington sent him (1716) into Devonshire, the year after Mr.
Pulteney took him to Aix, and in the following year Lord Harcourt
invited him to his seat, where, during his visit, two rural lovers
were killed with lightning, as is particularly told in Pope's
"Letters."

Being now generally known, he published (1720) his poems by
subscription, with such success that he raised a thousand pounds,
and called his friends to a consultation what use might be best made
of it.  Lewis, the steward of Lord Oxford, advised him to intrust it
to the Funds, and live upon the interest; Arbuthnot bade him to
intrust it to Providence, and live upon the principal; Pope directed
him, and was seconded by Swift, to purchase an annuity.

Gay in that disastrous year had a present from young Craggs of some
South Sea Stock, and once supposed himself to be master of twenty
thousand pounds.  His friends persuaded him to sell his share; but
he dreamed of dignity and splendour, and could not bear to obstruct
his own fortune.  He was then importuned to sell as much as would
purchase a hundred a year for life, "which," says Penton, "will make
you sure of a clean shirt and a shoulder of mutton every day."  This
counsel was rejected; the profit and principal were lost, and Gay
sunk under the calamity so low that his life became in danger.  By
the care of his friends, among whom Pope appears to have shown
particular tenderness, his health was restored; and, returning to
his studies, he wrote a tragedy called The Captives, which he was
invited to read before the Princess of Wales.  When the hour came,
he saw the Princess and her ladies all in expectation, and,
advancing with reverence too great for any other attention, stumbled
at a stool, and, falling forwards, threw down a weighty Japan
screen.  The Princess started, the ladies screamed, and poor Gay,
after all the disturbance, was still to read his play.

The fate of The Captives, which was acted at Drury Lane in 1723-4, I
know not; but he now thought himself in favour, and undertook (1726)
to write a volume of "Fables" for the improvement of the young Duke
of Cumberland.  For this he is said to have been promised a reward,
which he had doubtless magnified with all the wild expectations of
indigence and vanity.

Next year the Prince and Princess became King and Queen, and Gay was
to be great and happy; but on the settlement of the household, he
found himself appointed gentleman usher to the Princess Louisa.  By
this offer he thought himself insulted, and sent a message to the
Queen that he was too old for the place.  There seem to have been
many machinations employed afterwards in his favour, and diligent
court was paid to Mrs. Howard, afterwards Countess of Suffolk, who
was much beloved by the King and Queen, to engage her interest for
his promotion; but solicitation, verses, and flatteries were thrown
away; the lady heard them, and did nothing.  All the pain which he
suffered from neglect, or, as he perhaps termed it, the ingratitude
of the Court, may be supposed to have been driven away by the
unexampled success of the Beggar's Opera.  This play, written in
ridicule of the musical Italian drama, was first offered to Cibber
and his brethren at Drury Lane and rejected:  it being then carried
to Rich, had the effect, as was ludicrously said, of making Gay RICH
and Rich GAY.  Of this lucky piece, as the reader cannot but wish to
know the original and progress, I have inserted the relation which
Spence has given in Pope's words:--

"Dr. Swift had been observing once to Mr. Gay what an odd pretty
sort of a thing a Newgate Pastoral might make.  Gay was inclined to
try at such a thing for some time; but afterwards thought it would
be better to write a comedy on the same plan.  This was what gave
rise to the Beggar's Opera.  He began on it, and when first he
mentioned it to Swift, the doctor did not much like the project.  As
he carried it on, he showed what he wrote to both of us, and we now
and then gave a correction, or a word or two of advice; but it was
wholly of his own writing.  When it was done, neither of us thought
it would succeed.  We showed it to Congreve, who, after reading it
over, said it would either take greatly or be damned confoundedly.
We were all, at the first night of it, in great uncertainty of the
event, till we were very much encouraged by overhearing the Duke of
Argyll, who sat in the next box to us, say, 'It will do--it must do!
I see it in the eyes of them.'  This was a good while before the
first act was over, and so gave us ease soon; for that Duke (besides
his own good taste) has a particular knack, as any one now living,
in discovering the taste of the public.  He was quite right in this,
as usual; the good-nature of the audience appeared stronger and
stronger every act, and ended in a clamour of applause."

Its reception is thus recorded in the notes to the "Dunciad":--

"This piece was received with greater applause than was ever known.
Besides being acted in London sixty-three days without interruption,
and renewed the next season with equal applause, it spread into all
the great towns of England; was played in many places to the
thirtieth and fortieth time; at Bath and Bristol fifty, etc.  It
made its progress into Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, where it was
performed twenty-four days successively.  The ladies carried about
with them the favourite songs of it in fans, and houses were
furnished with it in screens.  The fame of it was not confined to
the author only.  The person who acted Polly, till then obscure,
became all at once the favourite of the town; her pictures were
engraved and sold in great numbers; her life written, books of
letters and verses to her published, and pamphlets made even of her
sayings and jests.  Furthermore, it drove out of England (for that
season) the Italian Opera, which had carried all before it for ten
years."

Of this performance, when it was printed, the reception was
different, according to the different opinions of its readers.
Swift commended it for the excellence of its morality, as a piece
that "placed all kinds of vice in the strongest and most odious
light;" but others, and among them Dr. Herring, afterwards
Archbishop of Canterbury, censured it as giving encouragement, not
only to vice, but to crimes, by making a highwayman the hero and
dismissing him at last unpunished.  It has been even said that after
the exhibition of the Beggar's Opera the gangs of robbers were
evidently multiplied.

Both these decisions are surely exaggerated.  The play, like many
others, was plainly written only to divert, without any moral
purpose, and is therefore not likely to do good; nor can it be
conceived, without more speculation than life requires or admits, to
be productive of much evil.  Highwaymen and housebreakers seldom
frequent the playhouse, or mingle in any elegant diversion; nor is
it possible for any one to imagine that he may rob with safety,
because he sees Macheath reprieved upon the stage.  This objection,
however, or some other rather political than moral, obtained such
prevalence that when Gay produced a second part under the name of
Polly, it was prohibited by the Lord Chamberlain; and he was forced
to recompense his repulse by a subscription, which is said to have
been so liberally bestowed that what he called oppression ended in
profit.  The publication was so much favoured that though the first
part gained him four hundred pounds, near thrice as much was the
profit of the second.  He received yet another recompense for this
supposed hardship, in the affectionate attention of the Duke and
Duchess of Queensberry, into whose house he was taken, and with whom
he passed the remaining part of his life.  The Duke, considering his
want of economy, undertook the management of his money, and gave it
to him as he wanted it.  But it is supposed that the discountenance
of the Court sunk deep into his heart, and gave him more discontent
than the applauses or tenderness of his friends could overpower.  He
soon fell into his old distemper, an habitual colic, and languished,
though with many intervals of ease and cheerfulness, till a violent
fit at last seized him and carried him to the grave, as Arbuthnot
reported, with more precipitance than he had ever known.  He died on
the 4th of December, 1732, and was buried in Westminster Abbey.  The
letter which brought an account of his death to Swift, was laid by
for some days unopened, because when he received it, he was
impressed with the preconception of some misfortune.

After his death was published a second volume of "Fables," more
political than the former.  His opera of Achilles was acted, and the
profits were given to two widow sisters, who inherited what he left,
as his lawful heirs; for he died without a will, though he had
gathered three thousand pounds.  There have appeared likewise under
his name a comedy called the Distressed Wife, and the Rehearsal at
Gotham, a piece of humour.

The character given him by Pope is this, that "he was a natural man,
without design, who spoke what he thought, and just as he thought
it," and that "he was of a timid temper, and fearful of giving
offence to the great;" which caution, however, says Pope, was of no
avail.

As a poet he cannot be rated very high.  He was, I once heard a
female critic remark, "of a lower order."  He had not in any great
degree the MENS DIVINIOR, the dignity of genius.  Much, however,
must be allowed to the author of a new species of composition,
though it be not of the highest kind.  We owe to Gay the ballad
opera, a mode of comedy which at first was supposed to delight only
by its novelty, but has now, by the experience of half a century,
been found so well accommodated to the disposition of a popular
audience that it is likely to keep long possession of the stage.
Whether this new drama was the product of judgment or of luck, the
praise of it must be given to the inventor; and there are many
writers read with more reverence to whom such merit or originality
cannot be attributed.

His first performance, the Rural Sports, is such as was easily
planned and executed; it is never contemptible, nor ever excellent.
The Fan is one of those mythological fictions which antiquity
delivers ready to the hand, but which, like other things that lie
open to every one's use, are of little value.  The attention
naturally retires from a new tale of Venus, Diana, and Minerva.

His "Fables" seem to have been a favourite work; for, having
published one volume, he left another behind him.  Of this kind of
Fables the author does not appear to have formed any distinct or
settled notion.  Phaedrus evidently confounds them with Tales, and
Gay both with Tales and Allegorical Prosopopoeias.  A Fable or
Apologue, such as is now under consideration, seems to be, in its
genuine state, a narrative in which beings irrational, and sometimes
inanimate, arbores loquuntur, non tantum ferae, are, for the purpose
of moral instruction, feigned to act and speak with human interests
and passions.  To this description the compositions of Gay do not
always conform.  For a fable he gives now and then a tale, or an
abstracted allegory; and from some, by whatever name they may be
called, it will be difficult to extract any moral principle.  They
are, however, told with liveliness, the versification is smooth, and
the diction, though now and then a little constrained by the measure
or the rhyme, is generally happy.

To "Trivia" may be allowed all that it claims; it is sprightly,
various, and pleasant.  The subject is of that kind which Gay was by
nature qualified to adorn, yet some of his decorations may be justly
wished away.  An honest blacksmith might have done for Patty what is
performed by Vulcan.  The appearance of Cloacina is nauseous and
superfluous; a shoe-boy could have been produced by the casual
cohabitation of mere mortals.  Horace's rule is broken in both
cases; there is no dignus vindice nodus, no difficulty that required
any supernatural interposition.  A patten may be made by the hammer
of a mortal, and a bastard may be dropped by a human strumpet.  On
great occasions, and on small, the mind is repelled by useless and
apparent falsehood.

Of his little poems the public judgment seems to be right; they are
neither much esteemed nor totally despised.  The story of "The
Apparition" is borrowed from one of the tales of Poggio.  Those that
please least are the pieces to which Gulliver gave occasion, for who
can much delight in the echo of an unnatural fiction?

"Dione" is a counterpart to "Amynta" and "Pastor Fido" and other
trifles of the same kind, easily imitated, and unworthy of
imitation.  What the Italians call comedies from a happy conclusion,
Gay calls a tragedy from a mournful event, but the style of the
Italians and of Gay is equally tragical.  There is something in the
poetical Arcadia so remote from known reality and speculative
possibility that we can never support its representation through a
long work.  A pastoral of an hundred lines may be endured, but who
will hear of sheep and goats, and myrtle bowers and purling
rivulets, through five acts?  Such scenes please barbarians in the
dawn of literature, and children in the dawn of life, but will be
for the most part thrown away as men grow wise and nations grow
learned.



TICKELL.



Thomas Tickell, the son of the Rev. Richard Tickell, was born in
1686, at Bridekirk, in Cumberland, and in 1701 became a member of
Queen's College in Oxford; in 1708 he was made Master of Arts, and
two years afterwards was chosen Fellow, for which, as he did not
comply with the statutes by taking orders, he obtained a
dispensation from the Crown.  He held his fellowship till 1726, and
then vacated it by marrying, in that year, at Dublin.

Tickell was not one of those scholars who wear away their lives in
closets; he entered early into the world and was long busy in public
affairs, in which he was initiated under the patronage of Addison,
whose notice he is said to have gained by his verses in praise of
Rosamond.  To those verses it would not have been just to deny
regard, for they contain some of the most elegant encomiastic
strains; and among the innumerable poems of the same kind it will be
hard to find one with which they need to fear a comparison.  It may
deserve observation that when Pope wrote long afterwards in praise
of Addison, he has copied--at least, has resembled--Tickell.

        "Let joy salute fair Rosamonda's shade,
     And wreaths of myrtle crown the lovely maid.
     While now perhaps with Dido's ghost she roves,
     And hears and tells the story of their loves,
     Alike they mourn, alike they bless their fate,
     Since Love, which made them wretched, made them great.
     Nor longer that relentless doom bemoan,
     Which gained a Virgil and an Addison."--TICKELL.


        "Then future ages with delight shall see
     How Plato's, Bacon's, Newton's, looks agree;
     Or in fair series laurelled bards be shown,
     A Virgil there, and here an Addison."--POPE.

He produced another piece of the same kind at the appearance of
Cato, with equal skill, but not equal happiness.

When the Ministers of Queen Anne were negotiating with France,
Tickell published "The Prospect of Peace," a poem of which the
tendency was to reclaim the nation from the pride of conquest to the
pleasures of tranquillity.  How far Tickell, whom Swift afterwards
mentioned as Whiggissimus, had then connected himself with any
party, I know not; this poem certainly did not flatter the
practices, or promote the opinions, of the men by whom he was
afterwards befriended.

Mr. Addison, however he hated the men then in power, suffered his
friendship to prevail over his public spirit, and gave in the
Spectator such praises of Tickell's poem that when, after having
long wished to peruse it, I laid hold of it at last, I thought it
unequal to the honours which it had received, and found it a piece
to be approved rather than admired.  But the hope excited by a work
of genius, being general and indefinite, is rarely gratified.  It
was read at that with so much favour that six editions were sold.

At the arrival of King George, he sang "The Royal Progress," which,
being inserted in the Spectator, is well known, and of which it is
just to say that it is neither high nor low.

The poetical incident of most importance in Tickell's life was his
publication of the first book of the "Iliad," as translated by
himself, an apparent opposition to Pope's "Homer," of which the
first part made its entrance into the world at the same time.
Addison declared that the rival versions were both good, but that
Tickell's was the best that ever was made; and with Addison, the
wits, his adherents and followers, were certain to concur.  Pope
does not appear to have been much dismayed, "for," says he, "I have
the town--that is, the mob--on my side."  But he remarks "that it is
common for the smaller party to make up in diligence what they want
in numbers.  He appeals to the people as his proper judges, and if
they are not inclined to condemn him, he is in little care about the
highflyers at Button's."

Pope did not long think Addison an impartial judge, for he
considered him as the writer of Tickell's version.  The reasons for
his suspicion I will literally transcribe from Mr. Spence's
Collection:--

"There had been a coldness," said Mr. Pope, "between Mr. Addison and
me for some time, and we had not been in company together, for a
good while, anywhere but at Button's Coffee House, where I used to
see him almost every day.  On his meeting me there, one day in
particular, he took me aside and said he should be glad to dine with
me at such a tavern, if I stayed till those people were gone
(Budgell and Philips).  He went accordingly, and after dinner Mr.
Addison said 'that he had wanted for some time to talk with me:
that his friend Tickell had formerly, whilst at Oxford, translated
the first book of the Iliad; that he designed to print it, and had
desired him to look it over; that he must therefore beg that I would
not desire him to look over my first book, because, if he did, it
would have the air of double-dealing.'  I assured him that I did not
at all take it ill of Mr. Tickell that he was going to publish his
translation; that he certainly had as much right to translate any
author as myself; and that publishing both was entering on a fair
stage.  I then added that I would not desire him to look over my
first book of the Iliad, because he had looked over Mr. Tickell's,
but could wish to have the benefit of his observations on my second,
which I had then finished, and which Mr. Tickell had not touched
upon.  Accordingly I sent him the second book the next morning, and
Mr. Addison a few days after returned it, with very high
commendations.  Soon after it was generally known that Mr. Tickell
was publishing the first book of the Iliad, I met Dr. Young in the
street, and upon our falling into that subject, the doctor expressed
a great deal of surprise at Tickell's having had such a translation
so long by him.  He said that it was inconceivable to him, and that
there must be some mistake in the matter; that each used to
communicate to the other whatever verses they wrote, even to the
least things; that Tickell could not have been busied in so long a
work there without his knowing something of the matter; and that he
had never heard a single word of it till on this occasion.  This
surprise of Dr. Young, together with what Steele has said against
Tickell in relation to this affair, make it highly probable that
there was some underhand dealing in that business; and indeed
Tickell himself, who is a very fair worthy man, has since, in a
manner, as good as owned it to me.  When it was introduced into a
conversation between Mr. Tickell and Mr. Pope by a third person,
Tickell did not deny it, which, considering his honour and zeal for
his departed friend, was the same as owning it."

Upon these suspicions, with which Dr. Warburton hints that other
circumstances concurred, Pope always in his "Art of Sinking" quotes
this book as the work of Addison.

To compare the two translations would be tedious; the palm is now
given universally to Pope, but I think the first lines of Tickell's
were rather to be preferred; and Pope seems to have since borrowed
something from them in the correction of his own.

When the Hanover succession was disputed, Tickell gave what
assistance his pen would supply.  His "Letter to Avignon" stands
high among party poems; it expresses contempt without coarseness,
and superiority without insolence.  It had the success which it
deserved, being five times printed.

He was now intimately united to Mr. Addison, who, when he went into
Ireland as secretary to the Lord Sunderland, took him thither, and
employed him in public business; and when (1717) afterwards he rose
to be Secretary of State, made him Under-Secretary.  Their
friendship seems to have continued without abatement; for, when
Addison died, he left him the charge of publishing his works, with a
solemn recommendation to the patronage of Craggs.  To these works he
prefixed an elegy on the author, which could owe none of its
beauties to the assistance which might be suspected to have
strengthened or embellished his earlier compositions; but neither he
nor Addison ever produced nobler lines than are contained in the
third and fourth paragraphs; nor is a more elegant funeral poem to
be found in the whole compass of English literature.  He was
afterwards (about 1725) made secretary to the Lords Justices of
Ireland, a place of great honour; in which he continued till 1740,
when he died on the 23rd of April at Bath.

Of the poems yet unmentioned, the longest is "Kensington Gardens,"
of which the versification is smooth and elegant, but the fiction
unskilfully compounded of Grecian deities and Gothic fairies.
Neither species of those exploded beings could have done much; and
when they are brought together, they only make each other
contemptible.  To Tickell, however, cannot be refused a high place
among the minor poets; nor should it be forgotten that he was one of
the contributors to the Spectator.  With respect to his personal
character, he is said to have been a man of gay conversation, at
least a temperate lover of wine and company, and in his domestic
relations without censure.



SOMERVILE.



Of Mr. Somervile's life I am not able to say anything that can
satisfy curiosity.  He was a gentleman whose estate lay in
Warwickshire; his house, where he was born in 1693, is called
Edston, a seat inherited from a long line of ancestors; for he was
said to be of the first family in his county.  He tells of himself
that he was born near the Avon's banks.  He was bred at Winchester
school, and was elected fellow of New College.  It does not appear
that in the places of his education he exhibited any uncommon proofs
of genius or literature.  His powers were first displayed in the
country, where he was distinguished as a poet, a gentleman, and a
skilful and useful justice of the peace.

Of the close of his life, those whom his poems have delighted will
read with pain the following account, copied from the "Letters" of
his friend Shenstone, by whom he was too much resembled:--

"--Our old friend Somervile is dead!  I did not imagine I could have
been so sorry as I find myself on this occasion.  Sublatum
quaerimus.  I can now excuse all his foibles; impute them to age,
and to distress of circumstances:  the last of these considerations
wrings my very soul to think on.  For a man of high spirit conscious
of having (at least in one production) generally pleased the world,
to be plagued and threatened by wretches that are low in every
sense; to be forced to drink himself into pains of the body, in
order to get rid of the pains of the mind is a misery."--He died
July 19, 1742, and was buried at Wotton, near Henley on Arden.

His distresses need not be much pitied:  his estate is said to be
fifteen hundred a year, which by his death has devolved to Lord
Somervile of Scotland.  His mother.  indeed, who lived till ninety,
had a jointure of six hundred.

It is with regret that I find myself not better enabled to exhibit
memorials of a writer who at least must be allowed to have set a
good example to men of his own class, by devoting part of his time
to elegant knowledge; and who has shown, by the subjects which his
poetry has adorned, that it is practicable to be at once a skilful
sportsman and a man of letters.

Somervile has tried many modes of poetry; and though perhaps he has
not in any reached such excellence as to raise much envy, it may
commonly be said at least, that "he writes very well for a
gentleman."  His serious pieces are sometimes elevated; and his
trifles are sometimes elegant.  In his verses to Addison, the
couplet which mentions Clio is written with the most exquisite
delicacy of praise; it exhibits one of those happy strokes that are
seldom attained.  In his Odes to Marlborough there are beautiful
lines; but in the second Ode he shows that he knew little of his
hero, when he talks of his private virtues.  His subjects are
commonly such as require no great depth of thought or energy of
expression.  His Fables are generally stale, and therefore excite no
curiosity.  Of his favourite,  "The Two Springs," the fiction is
unnatural, and the moral inconsequential.  In his Tales there is too
much coarseness, with too little care of language, and not
sufficient rapidity of narration.  His great work is his Chase,
which he undertook in his maturer age, when his ear was improved to
the approbation of blank verse, of which, however, his two first
lines give a bad specimen.  To this poem praise cannot be totally
denied.  He is allowed by sportsmen to write with great intelligence
of his subject, which is the first requisite to excellence; and
though it is impossible to interest the common readers of verse in
the dangers or pleasures of the chase, he has done all that
transition and variety could easily effect; and has with great
propriety enlarged his plan by the modes of hunting used in other
countries.

With still less judgment did he choose blank verse as the vehicle of
"Rural Sports."  If blank verse be not tumid and gorgeous, it is
crippled prose; and familiar images in laboured language have
nothing to recommend them but absurd novelty, which, wanting the
attractions of nature, cannot please long.  One excellence of the
"Splendid Shilling" is, that it is short.  Disguise can gratify no
longer than it deceives.



THOMSON.



James Thomson, the son of a minister well esteemed for his piety and
diligence, was born September 7, 1700, at Ednam, in the shire of
Roxburgh, of which his father was pastor.  His mother, whose name
was Hume, inherited as co-heiress a portion of a small estate.  The
revenue of a parish in Scotland is seldom large; and it was probably
in commiseration of the difficulty with which Mr. Thomson supported
his family, having nine children, that Mr. Riccarton, a neighbouring
minister, discovering in James uncommon promises of future
excellence, undertook to superintend his education, and provide him
books.  He was taught the common rudiments of learning at the school
of Jedburgh, a place which he delights to recollect in his poem of
"Autumn;" but was not considered by his master as superior to common
boys, though in those early days he amused his patron and his
friends with poetical compositions; with which, however, he so
little pleased himself that on every New Year's Day he threw into
the fire all the productions of the foregoing year.

From the school he was removed to Edinburgh, where he had not
resided two years when his father died, and left all his children to
the care of their mother, who raised upon her little estate what
money a mortgage could afford; and, removing with her family to
Edinburgh, lived to see her son rising into eminence.

The design of Thomson's friends was to breed him a minister.  He
lived at Edinburgh, at a school, without distinction or expectation,
till at the usual time he performed a probationary exercise by
explaining a psalm.  His diction was so poetically splendid, that
Mr. Hamilton, the professor of divinity, reproved him for speaking
language unintelligible to a popular audience; and he censured one
of his expressions as indecent, if not profane.  This rebuke is
reported to have repressed his thoughts of an ecclesiastical
character, and he probably cultivated with new diligence his
blossoms of poetry, which, however, were in some danger of a blast;
for, submitting his productions to some who thought themselves
qualified to criticise, he heard of nothing but faults; but, finding
other judges more favourable, he did not suffer himself to sink into
despondence.  He easily discovered that the only stage on which a
poet could appear with any hope of advantage was London; a place too
wide for the operation of petty competition and private malignity,
where merit might soon become conspicuous, and would find friends as
soon as it became reputable to befriend it.  A lady who was
acquainted with his mother advised him to the journey, and promised
some countenance or assistance, which at last he never received;
however, he justified his adventure by her encouragement, and came
to seek in London patronage and fame.  At his arrival he found his
way to Mr. Mallet, then tutor to the sons of the Duke of Montrose.
He had recommendations to several persons of consequence, which he
had tied up carefully in his handkerchief; but as he passed along
the street, with the gaping curiosity of a newcomer, his attention
was upon everything rather than his pocket, and his magazine of
credentials was stolen from him.

His first want was a pair of shoes.  For the supply of all his
necessities, his whole fund was his "Winter," which for a time could
find no purchaser; till at last Mr. Millan was persuaded to buy it
at a low price; and this low price he had for some time reason to
regret; but, by accident, Mr. Whately, a man not wholly unknown
among authors, happening to turn his eye upon it, was so delighted
that he ran from place to place celebrating its excellence.  Thomson
obtained likewise the notice of Aaron Hill, whom, being friendless
and indigent, and glad of kindness, he courted with every expression
of servile adulation.

"Winter" was dedicated to Sir Spencer Compton, but attracted no
regard from him to the author; till Aaron Hill awakened his
attention by some verses addressed to Thomson, and published in one
of the newspapers, which censured the great for their neglect of
ingenious men.  Thomson then received a present of twenty guineas,
of which he gives this account to Mr. Hill:--

I hinted to you in my last that on Saturday morning I was with Sir
Spencer Compton.  A certain gentleman, without my desire, spoke to
him concerning me:  his answer was that I had never come near him.
Then the gentleman put the question, if he desired that I should
wait on him?  He returned, he did.  On this the gentleman gave me an
introductory letter to him.  He received me in what they commonly
call a civil manner; asked me some common-place questions, and made
me a present of twenty guineas.  I am very ready to own that the
present was larger than my performance deserved; and shall ascribe
it to his generosity, or any other cause, rather than the merit of
the address."

The poem, which, being of a new kind, few would venture at first to
like, by degrees gained upon the public; and one edition was very
speedily succeeded by another.

Thomson's credit was now high, and every day brought him new
friends; among others Dr. Rundle, a man afterwards unfortunately
famous, sought his acquaintance, and found his qualities such that
he recommended him to the Lord Chancellor Talbot.

"Winter" was accompanied, in many editions, not only with a preface
and dedication, but with poetical praises by Mr. Hill, Mr. Mallet
(then Malloch), and Mira, the fictitious name of a lady once too
well known.  Why the dedications are, to "Winter" and the other
Seasons, contrarily to custom, left out in the collected works, the
reader may inquire.

The next year (1727) he distinguished himself by three publications:
of "Summer," in pursuance of his plan; of "A Poem on the Death of
Sir Isaac Newton," which he was enabled to perform as an exact
philosopher by the instruction of Mr. Gray; and of "Britannia," a
kind of poetical invective against the Ministry, whom the nation
then thought not forward enough in resenting the depredations of the
Spaniards.  By this piece he declared himself an adherent to the
Opposition, and had therefore no favour to expect from the Court.

Thomson, having been some time entertained in the family of Lord
Binning, was desirous of testifying his gratitude by making him the
patron of his "Summer;" but the same kindness which had first
disposed Lord Binning to encourage him, determined him to refuse the
dedication, which was by his advice addressed to Mr. Dodington, a
man who had more power to advance the reputation and fortune of a
poet.

"Spring" was published next year, with a dedication to the Countess
of Hertford, whose practice it was to invite every summer some poet
into the country, to hear her verses and assist her studies.  This
honour was one summer conferred on Thomson, who took more delight in
carousing with Lord Hertford and his friends than assisting her
ladyship's poetical operations, and therefore never received another
summons.

"Autumn," the season to which the "Spring" and "Summer" are
preparatory, still remained unsung, and was delayed till he
published (1730) his works collected.

He produced in 1727 the tragedy of Sophonisba, which raised such
expectation that every rehearsal was dignified with a splendid
audience, collected to anticipate the delight that was preparing for
the public.  It was observed, however, that nobody was much
affected, and that the company rose as from a moral lecture.  It had
upon the stage no unusual degree of success.  Slight accidents will
operate upon the taste of pleasure.  There is a feeble line in the
play:--

     "O Sophonisba, Sophonisba, O!"

This gave occasion to a waggish parody--

     "O, Jemmy Thomson, Jemmy Thomson, O!"

which for a while was echoed through the town.

I have been told by Savage, that of the prologue to Sophonisba, the
first part was written by Pope, who could not be persuaded to finish
it; and that the concluding lines were added by Mallet.

Thomson was not long afterwards, by the influence of Dr. Rundle,
sent to travel with Mr. Charles Talbot, the eldest son of the
Chancellor.  He was yet young enough to receive new impressions, to
have his opinions rectified and his views enlarged; nor can he be
supposed to have wanted that curiosity which is inseparable from an
active and comprehensive mind.  He may therefore now be supposed to
have revelled in all the joys of intellectual luxury; he was every
day feasted with instructive novelties; he lived splendidly without
expense:  and might expect when he returned home a certain
establishment.

At this time a long course of opposition to Sir Robert Walpole had
filled the nation with clamours for liberty, of which no man felt
the want, and with care for liberty which was not in danger.
Thomson, in his travels on the Continent, found or fancied so many
evils arising from the tyranny of other governments, that he
resolved to write a very long poem, in five parts, upon Liberty.
While he was busy on the first book, Mr. Talbot died; and Thomson,
who had been rewarded for his attendance by the place of secretary
of the briefs, pays in the initial lines a decent tribute to his
memory.  Upon this great poem two years were spent, and the author
congratulated himself upon it as his noblest work; but an author and
his reader are not always of a mind.  Liberty called in vain upon
her votaries to read her praises, and reward her encomiast:  her
praises were condemned to harbour spiders, and to gather dust:  none
of Thomson's performances were so little regarded.  The judgment of
the public was not erroneous; the recurrence of the same images must
tire in time; an enumeration of examples to prove a position which
nobody denied, as it was from the beginning superfluous, must
quickly grow disgusting.

The poem of "Liberty" does not now appear in its original state;
but, when the author's works were collected after his death, was
shortened by Sir George Lyttelton, with a liberty which, as it has a
manifest tendency to lessen the confidence of society, and to
confound the characters of authors, by making one man write by the
judgment of another, cannot be justified by any supposed propriety
of the alteration, or kindness of the friend.  I wish to see it
exhibited as its author left it.

Thomson now lived in ease and plenty, and seems for a while to have
suspended his poetry:  but he was soon called back to labour by the
death of the Chancellor, for his place then became vacant; and
though the Lord Hardwicke delayed for some time to give it away,
Thomson's bashfulness or pride, or some other motive perhaps not
more laudable, withheld him from soliciting; and the new Chancellor
would not give him what he would not ask.  He now relapsed to his
former indigence; but the Prince of Wales was at that time
struggling for popularity, and by the influence of Mr. Lyttelton
professed himself the patron of wit; to him Thomson was introduced,
and being gaily interrogated about the state of his affairs said
"that they were in a more poetical posture than formerly," and had a
pension allowed him of one hundred pounds a year.

Being now obliged to write, he produced (1738) the tragedy of
Agamemnon, which was much shortened in the representation.  It had
the fate which most commonly attends mythological stories, and was
only endured, but not favoured.  It struggled with such difficulty
through the first night that Thomson, coming late to his friends
with whom he was to sup, excused his delay by telling them how the
sweat of his distress had so disordered his wig that he could not
come till he had been refitted by a barber.  He so interested
himself in his own drama that, if I remember right, as he sat in the
upper gallery, he accompanied the players by audible recitation,
till a friendly hint frighted him to silence.  Pope countenanced
Agamemnon by coming to it, the first night, and was welcomed to the
theatre by a general clap; he had much regard for Thomson, and once
expressed it in a poetical epistle sent to Italy, of which, however,
he abated the value by transplanting some of the lines into his
Epistle to Arbuthnot.

About this time (1737) the Act was passed for licensing plays, of
which the first operation was the prohibition of Gustavus Vasa, a
tragedy of Mr. Brooke, whom the public recompensed by a very liberal
subscription; the next was the refusal of Edward and Eleonora,
offered by Thomson.  It is hard to discover why either play should
have been obstructed.  Thomson likewise endeavoured to repair his
loss by a subscription, of which I cannot now tell the success.
When the public murmured at the unkind treatment of Thomson, one of
the Ministerial writers remarked that "he had taken a Liberty which
was not agreeable to Britannia in any Season."  He was soon after
employed, in conjunction with Mr. Mallet, to write the masque of
Alfred, which was acted before the Prince at Cliefden House.

His next work (1745) was, Tancred and Sigismunda, the most
successful of all his tragedies, for it still keeps its turn upon
the stage.  It may be doubted whether he was, either by the bent of
nature or habits of study, much qualified for tragedy.  It does not
appear that he had much sense of the pathetic; and his diffusive and
descriptive style produced declamation rather than dialogue.  His
friend Mr. Lyttelton was now in power, and conferred upon him the
office of Surveyor-General of the Leeward Islands; from which, when
his deputy was paid, he received about three hundred pounds a year.

The last piece that he lived to publish was the "Castle of
Indolence," which was many years under his hand, but was at last
finished with great accuracy.  The first canto opens a scene of lazy
luxury that fills the imagination.  He was now at ease, but was not
long to enjoy it, for, by taking cold on the water between London
and Kew, he caught a disorder, which, with some careless
exasperation, ended in a fever that put an end to his life, August
27, 1748.  He was buried in the church of Richmond, without an
inscription; but a monument has been erected to his memory in
Westminster Abbey.

Thomson was of stature above the middle size, and "more fat than
bard beseems," of a dull countenance and a gross, unanimated,
uninviting appearance; silent in mingled company, but cheerful among
select friends, and by his friends very tenderly and warmly beloved.
He left behind him the tragedy of Coriolanus, which was, by the zeal
of his patron, Sir George Lyttelton, brought upon the stage for the
benefit of his family, and recommended by a prologue, which Quin,
who had long lived with Thomson in fond intimacy, spoke in such a
manner as showed him "to be," on that occasion, "no actor."  The
commencement of this benevolence is very honourable to Quin, who is
reported to have delivered Thomson, then known to him only for his
genius, from an arrest by a very considerable present; and its
continuance is honourable to both, for friendship is not always the
sequel of obligation.  By this tragedy a considerable sum was
raised, of which part discharged his debts, and the rest was
remitted to his sisters, whom, however removed from them by place or
condition, he regarded with great tenderness, as will appear by the
following letter, which I communicate with much pleasure, as it
gives me at once an opportunity of recording the fraternal kindness
of Thomson, and reflecting on the friendly assistance of Mr.
Boswell, from whom I received it:--

     "Hagley in Worcestershire, October the 4th, 1747.

"My Dear Sister,--I thought you had known me better than to
interpret my silence into a decay of affection, especially as your
behaviour has always been such as rather to increase than diminish
it.  Don't imagine, because I am a bad correspondent, that I can
ever prove an unkind friend and brother.  I must do myself the
justice to tell you that my affections are naturally very fixed and
constant; and if I had ever reason of complaint against you (of
which, by-the-bye, I have not the least shadow), I am conscious of
so many defects in myself as dispose me to be not a little
charitable and forgiving.

"It gives me the truest heart-felt satisfaction to hear you have a
good kind husband, and are in easy contented circumstances; but were
they otherwise, that would only awaken and heighten my tenderness
towards you.  As our good and tender-hearted parents did not live to
receive any material testimonies of that highest human gratitude I
owed them (than which nothing could have given me equal pleasure),
the only return I can make them now is by kindness to those they
left behind them.  Would to God poor Lizy had lived longer, to have
been a farther witness of the truth of what I say and that I might
have had the pleasure of seeing once more a sister who so truly
deserved my esteem and love!  But she is happy, while we must toil a
little longer here below: let us, however, do it cheerfully and
gratefully, supported by the pleasing hope of meeting you again on a
safer shore, where to recollect the storms and difficulties of life
will not perhaps be inconsistent with that blissful state.  You did
right to call your daughter by her name:  for you must needs have
had a particular tender friendship for one another, endeared as you
were by nature, by having passed the affectionate years of your
youth together:  and by that great softener and engager of hearts,
mutual hardship.  That it was in my power to ease it a little, I
account one of the most exquisite pleasures of my life.  But enough
of this melancholy, though not unpleasing, strain.

"I esteem you for your sensible and disinterested advice to Mr.
Bell, as you will see by my letter to him.  As I approve entirely of
his marrying again, you may readily ask me why I don't marry at all.
My circumstances have hitherto been so variable and uncertain in
this fluctuating world, as induce to keep me from engaging in such a
state:  and now, though they are more settled, and of late (which
you will be glad to hear) considerably improved, I begin to think
myself too far advanced in life for such youthful undertakings, not
to mention some other petty reasons that are apt to startle the
delicacy of difficult old bachelors.  I am, however, not a little
suspicious that, was I to pay a visit to Scotland (which I have some
thought of doing soon), I might possibly be tempted to think of a
thing not easily repaired if done amiss.  I have always been of
opinion that none make better wives than the ladies of Scotland; and
yet who more forsaken than they, while the gentlemen are continually
running abroad all the world over?  Some of them, it is true, are
wise enough to return for a wife.  You see, I am beginning to make
interest already with the Scots ladies.  But no more of this
infectious subject.  Pray let me hear from you now and then; and
though I am not a regular correspondent, yet perhaps I may mend in
that respect.  Remember me kindly to your husband, and believe me to
be

           "Your most affectionate Brother,
                    "James Thomson."
(Addressed) "To Mrs. Thomson in Lanark."

The benevolence of Thomson was fervid, but not active; he would give
on all occasions what assistance his purse would supply, but the
offices of intervention or solicitation he could not conquer his
sluggishness sufficiently to perform.  The affairs of others,
however, were not more neglected than his own.  He had often felt
the inconveniences of idleness, but he never cured it; and was so
conscious of his own character that he talked of writing an Eastern
tale "Of the Man who Loved to be in Distress."  Among his
peculiarities was a very unskilful and inarticulate manner of
pronouncing any lofty or solemn composition.  He was once reading to
Dodington, who, being himself a reader eminently elegant, was so
much provoked by his odd utterance that he snatched the paper from
his hands and told him that he did not understand his own verses.

The biographer of Thomson has remarked that an author's life is best
read in his works; his observation was not well timed.  Savage, who
lived much with Thomson, once told me how he heard a lady remarking
that she could gather from his works three-parts of his character:
that he was "a great lover, a great swimmer, and rigorously
abstinent;" "but," said Savage, "he knows not any love but that of
the sex; he was, perhaps, never in cold water in his life; and he
indulges himself in all the luxury that comes within his reach."
Yet Savage always spoke with the most eager praise of his social
qualities, his warmth and constancy of friendship, and his adherence
to his first acquaintance when the advancement of his reputation had
left them behind him.

As a writer, he is entitled to one praise of the highest kind:  his
mode of thinking and of expressing his thoughts is original.  His
blank verse is no more the blank verse of Milton, or of any other
poet, than the rhymes of Prior are the rhymes of Cowley.  His
numbers, his pauses, his diction, are of his own growth, without
transcription, without imitation.  He thinks in a peculiar train,
and he thinks always as a man of genius; he looks round on Nature
and on Life with the eye which Nature bestows only on a poet; the
eye that distinguishes in everything presented to its view whatever
there is on which imagination can delight to be detained, and with a
mind that at once comprehends the vast and attends to the minute.
The reader of the "Seasons" wonders that he never saw before what
Thomson shows him, and that he never yet has felt what Thomson
impresses.  His is one of the works in which blank verse seems
properly used.  Thomson's wide expansion of general views, and his
enumeration of circumstantial varieties, would have been obstructed
and embarrassed by the frequent intersections of the sense, which
are the necessary effects of rhyme.  His descriptions of extended
scenes and general effects bring before us the whole magnificence of
Nature, whether pleasing or dreadful.  The gaiety of Spring, the
splendour of Summer, the tranquillity of Autumn, and the horror of
Winter, take in their turns possession of the mind.  The poet leads
us through the appearances of things as they are successively varied
by the vicissitudes of the year, and imparts to us so much of his
own enthusiasm that our thoughts expand with his imagery and kindle
with his sentiments.  Nor is the naturalist without his part in the
entertainment, for he is assisted to recollect and to combine, to
arrange his discoveries, and to amplify the sphere of his
contemplation.  The great defect of the "Seasons" is want of method;
but for this I know not that there was any remedy.  Of many
appearances subsisting all at once, no rule can be given why one
should be mentioned before another; yet the memory wants the help of
order, and the curiosity is not excited by suspense or expectation.
His diction is in the highest degree florid and luxuriant, such as
may be said to be to his images and thoughts "both their lustre and
their shade;" such as invests them with splendour, through which,
perhaps, they are not always easily discerned.  It is too exuberant,
and sometimes may be charged with filling the ear more than the
mind.

These poems, with which I was acquainted at their first appearance,
I have since found altered and enlarged by subsequent revisals, as
the author supposed his judgment to grow more exact, and as books or
conversation extended his knowledge and opened his prospects.  They
are, I think, improved in general; yet I know not whether they have
not lost part of what Temple calls their "race," a word which,
applied to wines in its primitive sense, means the flavour of the
soil.

"Liberty," when it first appeared, I tried to read, and soon
desisted.  I have never tried again, and therefore will not hazard
either praise or censure.  The highest praise which he has received
ought not to be suppressed:  it is said by Lord Lyttelton, in the
Prologue to his posthumous play, that his works contained

     "No line which, dying, he could wish to blot."



WATTS.



The poems of Dr. Watts were, by my recommendation, inserted in the
late Collection, the readers of which are to impute to me whatever
pleasure or weariness they may find in the perusal of Blackmore,
Watts, Pomfret, and Yalden.

Isaac Watts was born July 17, 1674, at Southampton, where his
father, of the same name, kept a boarding-school for young
gentlemen, though common report makes him a shoemaker.  He appears,
from the narrative of Dr. Gibbons, to have been neither indigent nor
illiterate.

Isaac, the eldest of nine children, was given to books from his
infancy, and began, we are told, to learn Latin when he was four
years old--I suppose, at home.  He was afterwards taught Latin,
Greek, and Hebrew, by Mr. Pinhorne, a clergyman, master of the Free
School at Southampton, to whom the gratitude of his scholar
afterwards inscribed a Latin ode.  His proficiency at school was so
conspicuous that a subscription was proposed for his support at the
University, but he declared his resolution of taking his lot with
the Dissenters.  Such he was as every Christian Church would rejoice
to have adopted.  He therefore repaired, in 1690, to an academy
taught by Mr. Rowe, where he had for his companions and fellow
students Mr. Hughes the poet, and Dr. Horte, afterwards Archbishop
of Tuam.  Some Latin Essays, supposed to have been written as
exercises at this academy, show a degree of knowledge, both
philosophical and theological, such as very few attain by a much
longer course of study.  He was, as he hints in his "Miscellanies,"
a maker of verses from fifteen to fifty, and in his youth he appears
to have paid attention to Latin poetry.  His verses to his brother,
in the glyconic measure, written when he was seventeen, are
remarkably easy and elegant.  Some of his other odes are deformed by
the Pindaric folly then prevailing, and are written with such
neglect of all metrical rules as is without example among the
ancients; but his diction, though perhaps not always exactly pure,
has such copiousness and splendour as shows that he was but a very
little distance from excellence.  His method of study was to impress
the contents of his books upon his memory by abridging them, and by
interleaving them to amplify one system with supplements from
another.

With the congregation of his tutor, Mr. Rowe, who were, I believe,
Independents, he communicated in his nineteenth year.  At the age of
twenty he left the academy, and spent two years in study and
devotion at the house of his father, who treated him with great
tenderness, and had the happiness, indulged to few parents, of
living to see his son eminent for literature and venerable for
piety.  He was then entertained by Sir John Hartopp five years, as
domestic tutor to his son, and in that time particularly devoted
himself to the study of the Holy Scriptures; and, being chosen
assistant to Dr. Chauncey, preached the first time on the birthday
that completed his twenty-fourth year, probably considering that as
the day of a second nativity, by which he entered on a new period of
existence.

In about three years he succeeded Dr. Chauncey; but soon after his
entrance on his charge he was seized by a dangerous illness, which
sunk him to such weakness that the congregation thought an assistant
necessary, and appointed Mr. Price.  His health then returned
gradually, and he performed his duty till (1712) he was seized by a
fever of such violence and continuance, that from the feebleness
which it brought upon him he never perfectly recovered.  This
calamitous state made the compassion of his friends necessary, and
drew upon him the attention of Sir Thomas Abney, who received him
into his house, where, with a constancy of friendship and uniformity
of conduct not often to be found, he was treated for thirty-six
years with all the kindness that friendship could prompt, and all
the attention that respect could dictate.  Sir Thomas died about
eight years afterwards, but he continued with the lady and her
daughters to the end of his life.  The lady died about a year after
him.

A coalition like this, a state in which the notions of patronage and
dependence were overpowered by the perception of reciprocal
benefits, deserves a particular memorial; and I will not withhold
from the reader Dr. Gibbons's representation, to which regard is to
be paid as to the narrative of one who writes what he knows, and
what is known likewise to multitudes besides:--

"Our next observation shall be made upon that remarkably kind
Providence which brought the Doctor into Sir Thomas Abney's family,
and continued him there till his death, a period of no less than
thirty-six years.  In the midst of his sacred labours for the glory
of God, and good of his generation, he is seized with a most violent
and threatening fever, which leaves him oppressed with great
weakness, and puts a stop at least to his public services for four
years.  In this distressing season, doubly so to his active and
pious spirit, he is invited to Sir Thomas Abney's family, nor ever
removes from it till he had finished his days.  Here he enjoyed the
uninterrupted demonstrations of the truest friendship.  Here,
without any care of his own, he had everything which could
contribute to the enjoyment of life, and favour the unwearied
pursuit of his studies.  Here he dwelt in a family which, for piety,
order, harmony, and every virtue, was a house of God.  Here he had
the privilege of a country recess, the fragrant bower, the spreading
lawn, the flowery garden, and other advantages, to soothe his mind
and aid his restoration to health; to yield him, whenever he chose
them, most grateful intervals from his laborious studies, and enable
him to return to them with redoubled vigour and delight.  Had it not
been for this most happy event, he might, as to outward view, have
feebly, it may be painfully, dragged on through many more years of
languor, and inability for public service, and even for profitable
study, or perhaps might have sunk into his grave under the
overwhelming load of infirmities in the midst of his days; and thus
the Church and world would have been deprived of those many
excellent sermons and works which he drew up and published during
his long residence in this family.  In a few years after his coming
hither, Sir Thomas Abney dies; but his amiable consort survives, who
shows the Doctor the same respect and friendship as before, and most
happily for him and great numbers besides; for, as her riches were
great, her generosity and munificence were in full proportion; her
thread of life was drawn out to a great age, even beyond that of the
Doctor's, and thus this excellent man, through her kindness, and
that of her daughter, the present Mrs. Elizabeth Abney, who in a
like degree esteemed and honoured him, enjoyed all the benefits and
felicities he experienced at his first entrance into this family
till his days were numbered and finished, and, like a shock of corn
in its season, he ascended into the regions of perfect and immortal
life and joy."

If this quotation has appeared long, let it be considered that it
comprises an account of six-and-thirty years, and those the years of
Dr. Watts.

From the time of his reception into this family his life was no
otherwise diversified than by successive publications.  The series
of his works I am not able to deduce; their number and their variety
show the intenseness of his industry and the extent of his capacity.
He was one of the first authors that taught the Dissenters to court
attention by the graces of language.  Whatever they had among them
before, whether of learning or acuteness, was commonly obscured and
blunted by coarseness and inelegance of style.  He showed them that
zeal and purity might be expressed and enforced by polished diction.
He continued to the end of his life a teacher of a congregation, and
no reader of his works can doubt his fidelity or diligence.  In the
pulpit, though his low stature, which very little exceeded five
feet, graced him with no advantages of appearance, yet the gravity
and propriety of his utterance made his discourses very efficacious.
I once mentioned the reputation which Mr. Foster had gained by his
proper delivery, to my friend Dr. Hawkesworth, who told me that in
the art of pronunciation he was far inferior to Dr. Watts.  Such was
his flow of thoughts, and such his promptitude of language, that in
the latter part of his life he did not precompose his cursory
sermons, but, having adjusted the heads and sketched out some
particulars, trusted for success to his extemporary powers.  He did
not endeavour to assist his eloquence by any gesticulations; for, as
no corporeal actions have any correspondence with theological truth,
he did not see how they could enforce it.  At the conclusion of
weighty sentences he gave time, by a short pause, for the proper
impression.

To stated and public instruction he added familiar visits and
personal application, and was careful to improve the opportunities
which conversation offered of diffusing and increasing the influence
of religion.  By his natural temper he was quick of resentment; but
by his established and habitual practice he was gentle, modest, and
inoffensive.  His tenderness appeared in his attention to children,
and to the poor.  To the poor, while he lived in the family of his
friend, he allowed the third part of his annual revenue; though the
whole was not a hundred a year; and for children he condescended to
lay aside the scholar, the philosopher, and the wit, to write little
poems of devotion, and systems of instruction, adapted to their
wants and capacities, from the dawn of reason through its gradations
of advance in the morning of life.  Every man acquainted with the
common principles of human action will look with veneration on the
writer who is at one time combating Locke, and at another making a
catechism for children in their fourth year.  A voluntary descent
from the dignity of science is perhaps the hardest lesson that
humility can teach.

As his mind was capacious, his curiosity excursive, and his industry
continual, his writings are very numerous and his subjects various.
With his theological works I am only enough acquainted to admire his
meekness of opposition, and his mildness of censure.  It was not
only in his book, but in his mind, that orthodoxy was united with
charity.

Of his philosophical pieces, his "Logic" has been received into the
Universities, and therefore wants no private recommendation; if he
owes part of it to Le Clerc, it must be considered that no man who
undertakes merely to methodise or illustrate a system pretends to be
its author.

In his metaphysical disquisitions it was observed by the late
learned Mr. Dyer, that he confounded the idea of SPACE with that of
EMPTY SPACE, and did not consider that though space might be without
matter, yet matter being extended could not be without space.

Few books have been perused by me with greater pleasure than his
"Improvement of the Mind," of which the radical principle may indeed
be found in Locke's "Conduct of the Understanding;" but they are so
expanded and ramified by Watts, as to confer upon him the merit of a
work in the highest degree useful and pleasing.  Whoever has the
care of instructing others may be charged with deficiency in his
duty if this book is not recommended.

I have mentioned his treatises of theology as distinct from his
other productions; but the truth is that whatever he took in hand
was, by his incessant solicitude for souls, converted to theology.
As piety predominated in his mind, it is diffused over his works.
Under his direction it may be truly said, Theologiae philosophia
ancillatur (Philosophy is subservient to evangelical instruction).
It is difficult to read a page without learning, or at least
wishing, to be better.  The attention is caught by indirect
instruction; and he that sat down only to reason is on a sudden
compelled to pray.  It was therefore with great propriety that, in
1728, he received from Edinburgh and Aberdeen an unsolicited
diploma, by which he became a Doctor of Divinity.  Academical
honours would have more value if they were always bestowed with
equal judgment.  He continued many years to study and to preach, and
to do good by his instruction and example, till at last the
infirmities of age disabled him from the more laborious part of his
ministerial functions, and, being no longer capable of public duty,
he offered to remit the salary appendent to it; but his congregation
would not accept the resignation.  By degrees his weakness
increased, and at last confined him to his chamber and his bed,
where he was worn gradually away without pain, till he expired
November 25th 1748, in the seventy-fifth year of his age.

Few men have left behind such purity of character, or such monuments
of laborious piety.  He has provided instruction for all ages--from
those who are lisping their first lessons, to the enlightened
readers of Malebranche and Locke; he has left neither corporeal nor
spiritual nature unexamined; he has taught the art of reasoning, and
the science of the stars.  His character, therefore, must be formed
from the multiplicity and diversity of his attainments, rather than
from any single performance, for it would not be safe to claim for
him the highest rank in any single denomination of literary dignity;
yet, perhaps, there was nothing in which he would not have excelled,
if he had not divided his powers to different pursuits.

As a poet, had he been only a poet, he would probably have stood
high among the authors with whom he is now associated.  For his
judgment was exact, and he noted beauties and faults with very nice
discernment; his imagination, as the "Dacian Battle" proves, was
vigorous and active, and the stores of knowledge were large by which
his fancy was to be supplied.  His ear was well tuned, and his
diction was elegant and copious.  But his devotional poetry is, like
that of others, unsatisfactory.  The paucity of its topics enforces
perpetual repetition, and the sanctity of the matter rejects the
ornaments of figurative diction.  It is sufficient for Watts to have
done better than others what no man has done well.  His poems on
other subjects seldom rise higher than might be expected from the
amusements of a man of letters, and have different degrees of value
as they are more or less laboured, or as the occasion was more or
less favourable to invention.  He writes too often without regular
measures, and too often in blank verse; the rhymes are not always
sufficiently correspondent.  He is particularly unhappy in coining
names expressive of characters.  His lines are commonly smooth and
easy, and his thoughts always religiously pure; but who is there
that, to so much piety and innocence, does not wish for a greater
measure of sprightliness and vigour?  He is at least one of the few
poets with whom youth and ignorance may be safely pleased; and happy
will be that reader whose mind is disposed, by his verses or his
prose, to imitate him in all but his non-conformity, to copy his
benevolence to man, and his
reverence to God.



A. PHILIPS.



Of the birth or early part of the life of Ambrose Philips I have not
been able to find any account.  His academical education he received
at St. John's College in Cambridge, where he first solicited the
notice of the world by some English verses, in the collection
published by the University on the death of Queen Mary.  From this
time how he was employed, or in what station he passed his life, is
not yet discovered.  He must have published his "Pastorals" before
the year 1708, because they are evidently prior to those of Pope.
He afterwards (1709) addressed to the universal patron, the Duke of
Dorset, a "Poetical Letter from Copenhagen," which was published in
the Tatler, and is by Pope, in one of his first Letters, mentioned
with high praise as the production of a man "who could write very
nobly."

Philips was a zealous Whig, and therefore easily found access to
Addison and Steele; but his ardour seems not to have procured him
anything more than kind words, since he was reduced to translate the
"Persian Tales" for Tonson, for which he was afterwards reproached,
with this addition of contempt, that he worked for half-a-crown.
The book is divided into many sections, for each of which, if he
received half-a-crown, his reward, as writers then were paid, was
very liberal; but half-a-crown had a mean sound.  He was employed in
promoting the principles of his party, by epitomising Hacket's "Life
of Archbishop Williams."  The original book is written with such
depravity of genius, such mixture of the fop and pedant, as has not
often appeared.  The epitome is free enough from affectation, but
has little spirit or vigour.

In 1712 he brought upon the stage The Distressed Mother, almost a
translation of Racine's Andromaque.  Such a work requires no
uncommon powers, but the friends of Philips exerted every art to
promote his interest. Before the appearance of the play a whole
Spectator, none indeed of the best, was devoted to its praise; while
it yet continued to be acted, another Spectator was written to tell
what impression it made upon Sir Roger, and on the first night a
select audience, says Pope, was called together to applaud it.  It
was concluded with the most successful Epilogue that was ever yet
spoken on the English theatre.  The three first nights it was
recited twice, and not only continued to be demanded through the
run, as it is termed, of the play, but whenever it is recalled to
the stage, where by peculiar fortune, though a copy from the French,
it yet keeps its place, the Epilogue is still expected, and is still
spoken.

The propriety of Epilogues in general, and consequently of this, was
questioned by a correspondent of the Spectator, whose letter was
undoubtedly admitted for the sake of the answer, which soon
followed, written with much zeal and acrimony.  The attack and the
defence equally contributed to stimulate curiosity and continue
attention.  It may be discovered in the defence that Prior's
Epilogue to Phaedra had a little excited jealousy, and something of
Prior's plan may be discovered in the performance of his rival.  Of
this distinguished Epilogue the reputed author was the wretched
Budgell, whom Addison used to denominate "the man who calls me
cousin;" and when he was asked how such a silly fellow could write
so well, replied, "The Epilogue was quite another thing when I saw
it first."  It was known in Tonson's family, and told to Garrick,
that Addison was himself the author of it, and that, when it had
been at first printed with his name, he came early in the morning,
before the copies were distributed, and ordered it to be given to
Budgell, that it might add weight to the solicitation which he was
then making for a place.

Philips was now high in the ranks of literature.  His play was
applauded; his translations from Sappho had been published in the
Spectator; he was an important and distinguished associate of clubs,
witty and poetical; and nothing was wanting to his happiness but
that he should be sure of its continuance.  The work which had
procured him the first notice from the public was his "Six
Pastorals," which, flattering the imagination with Arcadian scenes,
probably found many readers, and might have long passed as a
pleasing amusement had they not been unhappily too much commended.

The rustic poems of Theocritus were so highly valued by the Greeks
and Romans that they attracted the imitation of Virgil, whose
Eclogues seem to have been considered as precluding all attempts of
the same kind; for no shepherds were taught to sing by any
succeeding poet, till Nemesian and Calphurnius ventured their feeble
efforts in the lower age of Latin literature.

At the revival of learning in Italy it was soon discovered that a
dialogue of imaginary swains might be composed with little
difficulty, because the conversation of shepherds excludes profound
or refined sentiment; and for images and descriptions, satyrs and
fauns, and naiads and dryads, were always within call; and woods and
meadows, and hills and rivers, supplied variety of matter, which,
having a natural power to soothe the mind, did not quickly cloy it.

Petrarch entertained the learned men of his age with the novelty of
modern pastorals in Latin.  Being not ignorant of Greek, and finding
nothing in the word "eclogue" of rural meaning, he supposed it to be
corrupted by the copiers, and therefore called his own productions
"AEglogues," by which he meant to express the talk of goat-herds,
though it will mean only the talk of goats.  This new name was
adopted by subsequent writers, and among others by our Spenser.

More than a century afterwards (1498) Mantuan published his Bucolics
with such success that they were soon dignified by Badius with a
comment, and, as Scaliger complained, received into schools, and
taught as classical; his complaint was vain, and the practice,
however injudicious, spread far and continued long.  Mantuan was
read, at least in some of the inferior schools of this kingdom, to
the beginning of the present century.  The speakers of Mantuan
carried their disquisitions beyond the country to censure the
corruptions of the Church, and from him Spenser learned to employ
his swains on topics of controversy.  The Italians soon transferred
pastoral poetry into their own language.  Sannazaro wrote "Arcadia"
in prose and verse; Tasso and Guarini wrote "Favole Boschareccie,"
or Sylvan Dramas; and all nations of Europe filled volumes with
Thyrsis and Damon, and Thestylis and Phyllis.

Philips thinks it "somewhat strange to conceive how, in an age so
addicted to the Muses, pastoral poetry never comes to be so much as
thought upon."  His wonder seems very unseasonable; there had never,
from the time of Spenser, wanted writers to talk occasionally of
Arcadia and Strephon, and half the book, in which he first tried his
powers, consists of dialogues on Queen Mary's death, between Tityrus
and Corydon, or Mopsus and Menalcas.  A series or book of pastorals,
however, I know not that anyone had then lately published.

Not long afterwards Pope made the first display of his powers in
four pastorals, written in a very different form.  Philips had taken
Spenser, and Pope took Virgil for his pattern.  Philips endeavoured
to be natural, Pope laboured to be elegant.

Philips was now favoured by Addison and by Addison's companions, who
were very willing to push him into reputation.  The Guardian gave an
account of Pastoral, partly critical and partly historical; in
which, when the merit of the modern is compared, Tasso and Guarini
are censured for remote thoughts and unnatural refinements, and,
upon the whole, the Italians and French are all excluded from rural
poetry, and the pipe of the pastoral muse is transmitted by lawful
inheritance from Theocritus to Virgil, from Virgil to Spenser, and
from Spenser to Philips.  With this inauguration of Philips his
rival Pope was not much delighted; he therefore drew a comparison of
Philips's performance with his own, in which, with an unexampled and
unequalled artifice of irony, though he has himself always the
advantage, he gives the preference to Philips.  The design of
aggrandising himself he disguised with such dexterity that, though
Addison discovered it, Steele was deceived, and was afraid of
displeasing Pope by publishing his paper.  Published however it was
(Guardian, No. 40), and from that time Pope and Philips lived in a
perpetual reciprocation of malevolence.  In poetical powers, of
either praise or satire, there was no proportion between the
combatants; but Philips, though he could not prevail by wit, hoped
to hurt Pope with another weapon, and charged him, as Pope thought
with Addison's approbation, as disaffected to the Government.  Even
with this he was not satisfied, for, indeed, there is no appearance
that any regard was paid to his clamours.  He proceeded to grosser
insults, and hung up a rod at Button's, with which he threatened to
chastise Pope, who appears to have been extremely exasperated, for
in the first edition of his Letters he calls Philips "rascal," and
in the last still charges him with detaining in his hands the
subscriptions for "Homer" delivered to him by the Hanover Club.  I
suppose it was never suspected that he meant to appropriate the
money; he only delayed, and with sufficient meanness, the
gratification of him by whose prosperity he was pained.

Men sometimes suffer by injudicious kindness; Philips became
ridiculous, without his own fault, by the absurd admiration of his
friends, who decorated him with honorary garlands, which the first
breath of contradiction blasted.

When upon the succession of the House of Hanover every Whig expected
to be happy, Philips seems to have obtained too little notice; he
caught few drops of the golden shower, though he did not omit what
flattery could perform.  He was only made a commissioner of the
lottery (1717), and, what did not much elevate his character, a
justice of the peace.

The success of his first play must naturally dispose him to turn his
hopes towards the stage; he did not, however, soon commit himself to
the mercy of an audience, but contented himself with the fame
already acquired, till after nine years he produced (1722) The
Briton, a tragedy which, whatever was its reception, is now
neglected; though one of the scenes, between Vanoc the British
Prince and Valens the Roman General, is confessed to be written with
great dramatic skill, animated by spirit truly poetical.  He had not
been idle though he had been silent, for he exhibited another
tragedy the same year on the story of Humphry, Duke of Gloucester.
This tragedy is only remembered by its title.

His happiest undertaking was (1711) of a paper called The
Freethinker, in conjunction with associates, of whom one was Dr.
Boulter, who, then only minister of a parish in Southwark, was of so
much consequence to the Government that he was made first Bishop of
Bristol, and afterwards Primate of Ireland, where his piety and his
charity will be long honoured.  It may easily be imagined that what
was printed under the direction of Boulter would have nothing in it
indecent or licentious; its title is to be understood as implying
only freedom from unreasonable prejudice.  It has been reprinted in
volumes, but is little read; nor can impartial criticism recommend
it as worthy of revival.

Boulter was not well qualified to write diurnal essays, but he knew
how to practise the liberality of greatness and the fidelity of
friendship.  When he was advanced to the height of ecclesiastical
dignity, he did not forget the companion of his labours.  Knowing
Philips to be slenderly supported, he took him to Ireland as
partaker of his fortune, and, making him his secretary, added such
preferments as enabled him to represent the county of Armagh in the
Irish Parliament.  In December, 1726, he was made secretary to the
Lord Chancellor, and in August, 1733, became Judge of the
Prerogative Court.

After the death of his patron he continued some years in Ireland,
but at last longing, as it seems, for his native country, he
returned (1748) to London, having doubtless survived most of his
friends and enemies, and among them his dreaded antagonist Pope.  He
found, however, the Duke of Newcastle still living, and to him he
dedicated his poems collected into a volume.

Having purchased an annuity of 400 pounds, he now certainly hoped to
pass some years of life in plenty and tranquillity; but his hope
deceived him:  he was struck with a palsy, and died June 18, 1749,
in his seventy-eighth year.

Of his personal character all that I have heard is, that he was
eminent for bravery and skill in the sword, and that in conversation
he was solemn and pompous.  He had great sensibility of censure, if
judgment may be made by a single story which I heard long ago from
Mr. Ing, a gentleman of great eminence in Staffordshire.  "Philips,"
said he, "was once at table, when I asked him, 'How came thy king of
Epirus to drive oxen, and to say, "I'm goaded on by love"?'  After
which question he never spoke again."

Of The Distressed Mother not much is pretended to be his own, and
therefore it is no subject of criticism:  his other two tragedies, I
believe, are not below mediocrity, nor above it.  Among the poems
comprised in the late Collection, the "Letter from Denmark" may be
justly praised; the Pastorals, which by the writer of the Guardian
were ranked as one of the four genuine productions of the rustic
Muse, cannot surely be despicable.  That they exhibit a mode of life
which did not exist, nor ever existed, is not to be objected:  the
supposition of such a state is allowed to be pastoral.  In his other
poems he cannot be denied the praise of lines sometimes elegant; but
he has seldom much force or much comprehension.  The pieces that
please best are those which, from Pope and Pope's adherents,
procured him the name of "Namby-Pamby," the poems of short lines, by
which he paid his court to all ages and characters, from Walpole the
"steerer of the realm," to Miss Pulteney in the nursery.  The
numbers are smooth and sprightly, and the diction is seldom faulty.
They are not loaded with much thought, yet, if they had been written
by Addison, they would have had admirers:  little things are not
valued but when they are done by those who can do greater.

In his translations from "Pindar" he found the art of reaching all
the obscurity of the Theban bard, however he may fall below his
sublimity; he will be allowed, if he has less fire, to have more
smoke.  He has added nothing to English poetry, yet at least half
his book deserves to be read:  perhaps he valued most himself that
part which the critic would reject.



WEST.



Gilbert West is one of the writers of whom I regret my inability to
give a sufficient account; the intelligence which my inquiries have
obtained is general and scanty.  He was the son of the Rev. Dr.
West; perhaps him who published "Pindar" at Oxford about the
beginning of this century.  His mother was sister to Sir Richard
Temple, afterwards Lord Cobham.  His father, purposing to educate
him for the Church, sent him first to Eton, and afterwards to
Oxford; but he was seduced to a more airy mode of life, by a
commission in a troop of horse, procured him by his uncle.  He
continued some time in the army, though it is reasonable to suppose
that he never sunk into a mere soldier, nor ever lost the love, or
much neglected the pursuit, of learning; and afterwards, finding
himself more inclined to civil employment, he laid down his
commission, and engaged in business under the Lord Townshend, then
Secretary of State, with whom he attended the King to Hanover.

His adherence to Lord Townshend ended in nothing but a nomination
(May, 1729) to be Clerk-Extraordinary of the Privy Council, which
produced no immediate profit; for it only placed him in a state of
expectation and right of succession, and it was very long before a
vacancy admitted him to profit.

Soon afterwards he married, and settled himself in a very pleasant
house at Wickham, in Kent, where he devoted himself to learning and
to piety.  Of his learning the late Collection exhibits evidence,
which would have been yet fuller if the dissertations which
accompany his version of "Pindar" had not been improperly omitted.
Of his piety the influence has, I hope, been extended far by his
"Observations on the Resurrection," published in 1747, for which the
University of Oxford created him a Doctor of Laws, by diploma (March
30, 1748), and would doubtless have reached yet further had he lived
to complete what he had for some time meditated--the "Evidences of
the Truth of the New Testament."  Perhaps it may not be without
effect to tell that he read the prayers of the public Liturgy every
morning to his family, and that on Sunday evening he called his
servants into the parlour and read to them first a sermon and then
prayers.  Crashaw is now not the only maker of verses to whom may be
given the two venerable names of Poet and Saint.  He was very often
visited by Lyttelton and Pitt, who, when they were weary of faction
and debates, used at Wickham to find books and quiet, a decent
table, and literary conversation.  There is at Wickham a walk made
by Pitt; and, what is of far more importance, at Wickham, Lyttelton
received that conviction which produced his "Dissertation on St.
Paul."  These two illustrious friends had for a while listened to
the blandishments of infidelity; and when West's book was published,
it was bought by some who did not know his change of opinion, in
expectation of new objections against Christianity; and as infidels
do not want malignity, they revenged the disappointment by calling
him a Methodist.

Mr. West's income was not large; and his friends endeavoured, but
without success, to obtain an augmentation.  It is reported that the
education of the young Prince was offered to him, but that he
required a more extensive power of superintendence than it was
thought proper to allow him.  In time, however, his revenue was
improved; he lived to have one of the lucrative clerkships of the
Privy Council (1752); and Mr. Pitt at last had it in his power to
make him Treasurer of Chelsea Hospital.  He was now sufficiently
rich; but wealth came too late to be long enjoyed; nor could it
secure him from the calamities of life; he lost (1755) his only son;
and the year after (March 26) a stroke of the palsy brought to the
grave one of the few poets to whom the grave might be without its
terrors.

Of his translations I have only compared the first Olympic Ode with
the original, and found my expectation surpassed, both by its
elegance and its exactness.  He does not confine himself to his
author's train of stanzas; for he saw that the difference of
languages required a different mode of versification.  The first
strophe is eminently happy; in the second he has a little strayed
from Pindar's meaning, who says, "If thou, my soul, wishest to speak
of games, look not in the desert sky for a planet hotter than the
sun; nor shall we tell of nobler games than those of Olympia."  He
is sometimes too paraphrastical.  Pindar bestows upon Hiero an
epithet which, in one word, signifies DELIGHTING IN HORSES; a word
which, in the translation, generates these lines:--

     "Hiero's royal brows, whose care
        Tends the courser's noble breed,
      Pleased to nurse the pregnant mare,
        Pleased to train the youthful steed."

Pindar says of Pelops, that "he came alone in the dark to the White
Sea;" and West--

     "Near the billow-beaten side
      Of the foam-besilvered main,
      Darkling, and alone, he stood:"

which, however, is less exuberant than the former passage.

A work of this kind must, in a minute examination, discover many
imperfections; but West's version, so far as I have considered it,
appears to be the product of great labour and great abilities.

His "Institution of the Garter" (1742) is written with sufficient
knowledge of the manners that prevailed in the age to which it is
referred, and with great elegance of diction; but, for want of a
process of events, neither knowledge nor elegance preserves the
reader from weariness.

His "Imitations of Spenser" are very successfully performed, both
with respect to the metre, the language, and the fiction; and being
engaged at once by the excellence of the sentiments, and the
artifice of the copy, the mind has two amusements together.  But
such compositions are not to be reckoned among the great
achievements of intellect, because their effect is local and
temporary; they appeal not to reason or passion, but to memory, and
presuppose an accidental or artificial state of mind.  An imitation
of Spenser is nothing to a reader, however acute, by whom Spenser
has never been perused.  Works of this kind may deserve praise, as
proofs of great industry and great nicety of observation; but the
highest praise, the praise of genius, they cannot claim.  The
noblest beauties of art are those of which the effect is co-extended
with rational nature, or at least with the whole circle of polished
life; what is less than this can be only pretty, the plaything of
fashion, and the amusement of a day.

There is in the Adventurer a paper of verses given to one of the
authors as Mr. West's, and supposed to have been written by him.  It
should not be concealed, however, that it is printed with Mr. Jago's
name in Dodsley's Collection, and is mentioned as his in a letter of
Shenstone's.  Perhaps West gave it without naming the author, and
Hawkesworth, receiving it from him, thought it his; for his he
thought it, as he told me, and as he tells the public.



COLLINS.

William Collins was born at Chichester, on the 25th day of December,
about 1720.  His father was a hatter of good reputation.  He was in
1733, as Dr. Warton has kindly informed me, admitted scholar of
Winchester College, where he was educated by Dr. Burton.  His
English exercises were better than his Latin.  He first courted the
notice of the public by some verses to a "Lady weeping," published
in The Gentleman's Magazine (January, 1739).

In 1740 he stood first in the list of the scholars to be received in
succession at New College, but unhappily there was no vacancy.  He
became a Commoner of Queen's College, probably with a scanty
maintenance; but was, in about half a year, elected a Demy of
Magdalen College, where he continued till he had taken a Bachelor's
degree, and then suddenly left the University; for what reason I
know not that he told.

He now (about 1744) came to London a literary adventurer, with many
projects in his head, and very little money in his pocket.  He
designed many works; but his great fault was irresolution; or the
frequent calls of immediate necessity broke his scheme, and suffered
him to pursue no settled purpose.  A man doubtful of his dinner, or
trembling at a creditor, is not much disposed to abstracted
meditation or remote inquiries.  He published proposals for a
"History of the Revival of Learning;" and I have heard him speak
with great kindness of Leo X., and with keen resentment of his
tasteless successor.  But probably not a page of his history was
ever written.  He planned several tragedies, but he only planned
them.  He wrote now and then odes and other poems, and did
something, however little.  About this time I fell into his company.
His appearance was decent and manly; his knowledge considerable, his
views extensive, his conversation elegant, and his disposition
cheerful.  By degrees I gained his confidence; and one day was
admitted to him when he was immured by a bailiff that was prowling
in the street.  On this occasion recourse was had to the
booksellers, who, on the credit of a translation of Aristotle's
"Poetics," which he engaged to write with a large commentary,
advanced as much money as enabled him to escape into the country.
He showed me the guineas safe in his hand.  Soon afterwards his
uncle, Mr. Martin, a lieutenant-colonel, left him about 2000 pounds;
a sum which Collins could scarcely think exhaustible, and which he
did not live to exhaust. The guineas were then repaid, and the
translation neglected.  But man is not born for happiness.  Collins,
who, while he studied to live, felt no evil but poverty, no sooner
lived to study than his life was assailed by more dreadful
calamities--disease and insanity.

Having formerly written his character, while perhaps it was yet more
distinctly impressed upon my memory, I shall insert it here.

"Mr. Collins was a man of extensive literature, and of vigorous
faculties.  He was acquainted not only with the learned tongues, but
with the Italian, French, and Spanish languages.  He had employed
his mind chiefly on works of fiction, and subjects of fancy; and, by
indulging some peculiar habits of thought, was eminently delighted
with those flights of imagination which pass the bounds of nature,
and to which the mind is reconciled only by a passive acquiescence
in popular traditions.  He loved fairies, genii, giants, and
monsters; he delighted to rove through the meanders of enchantment,
to gaze on the magnificence of golden palaces, to repose by the
waterfalls of Elysian gardens.  This was, however, the character
rather of his inclination than his genius; the grandeur of wildness,
and the novelty of extravagance, were always desired by him, but not
always attained.  Yet, as diligence is never wholly lost, if his
efforts sometimes caused harshness and obscurity, they likewise
produced in happier moments sublimity and splendour.  This idea
which he had formed of excellence led him to Oriental fictions and
allegorical imagery, and, perhaps, while he was intent upon
description, he did not sufficiently cultivate sentiment.  His poems
are the productions of a mind not deficient in fire, nor unfurnished
with knowledge either of books or life, but somewhat obstructed in
its progress by deviation in quest of mistaken beauties.

"His morals were pure, and his opinions pious; in a long continuance
of poverty, and long habits of dissipation, it cannot be expected
that any character should be exactly uniform.  There is a degree of
want by which the freedom of agency is almost destroyed; and long
association with fortuitous companions will at last relax the
strictness of truth, and abate the fervour of sincerity.  That this
man, wise and virtuous as he was, passed always unentangled through
the snares of life, it would be prejudice and temerity to affirm;
but it may be said that at least he preserved the source of action
unpolluted, that his principles were never shaken, that his
distinctions of right and wrong were never confounded, and that his
faults had nothing of malignity or design, but proceeded from some
unexpected pressure, or casual temptation.

"The latter part of his life cannot be remembered but with pity and
sadness.  He languished some years under that depression of mind
which enchains the faculties without destroying them, and leaves
reason the knowledge of right without the power of pursuing it.
These clouds which he perceived gathering on his intellect he
endeavoured to disperse by travel, and passed into France; but found
himself constrained to yield to his malady, and returned.  He was
for some time confined in a house of lunatics, and afterwards
retired to the care of his sister in Chichester, where death, in
1756, came to his relief.

"After his return from France, the writer of this character paid him
a visit at Islington, where he was waiting for his sister, whom he
had directed to meet him.  There was then nothing of disorder
discernible in his mind by any but himself; but he had withdrawn
from study, and travelled with no other book than an English
Testament, such as children carry to the school.  When his friend
took it into his hand, out of curiosity to see what companion a man
of letters had chosen, 'I have but one book,' said Collins, 'but
that is the best.'"

Such was the fate of Collins, with whom I once delighted to
converse, and whom I yet remember with tenderness.

He was visited at Chichester, in his last illness, by his learned
friends Dr. Warton and his brother, to whom he spoke with
disapprobation of his "Oriental Eclogues," as not sufficiently
expressive of Asiatic manners, and called them his "Irish Eclogues."
He showed them, at the same time, an ode inscribed to Mr. John Home,
on the superstitions of the Highlands, which they thought superior
to his other works, but which no search has yet found.  His disorder
was no alienation of mind, but general laxity and feebleness--a
deficiency rather of his vital than his intellectual powers.  What
he spoke wanted neither judgment nor spirit; but a few minutes
exhausted him, so that he was forced to rest upon the couch, till a
short cessation restored his powers, and he was again able to talk
with his former vigour.  The approaches of this dreadful malady he
began to feel soon after his uncle's death; and, with the usual
weakness of men so diseased, eagerly snatched that temporary relief
with which the table and the bottle flatter and seduce.  But his
health continually declined, and he grew more and more burthensome
to himself.

To what I have formerly said of his writings may be added, that his
diction was often harsh, unskilfully laboured, and injudiciously
selected.  He affected the obsolete when it was not worthy of
revival:  and he puts his words out of the common order, seeming to
think, with some later candidates for fame, that not to write prose
is certainly to write poetry.  His lines commonly are of slow
motion, clogged and impeded with clusters of consonants.  As men are
often esteemed who cannot be loved, so the poetry of Collins may
sometimes extort praise when it gives little pleasure.

Mr. Collins's first production is added here from the Poetical
Calendar:--

            TO MISS AURELIA C--R,

     ON HER WEEPING AT HER SISTER'S WEDDING.

     "Cease, fair Aurelia, cease to mourn;
        Lament not Hannah's happy state;
      You may be happy in your turn,
        And seize the treasure you regret.
      With Love united Hymen stands,
        And softly whispers to your charms,
      'Meet but your lover in my bands,
        You'll find your sister in his arms.'"



DYER.



John Dyer, of whom I have no other account to give than his own
letters, published with Hughes's correspondence, and the notes added
by the editor, have afforded me, was born in 1700, the second son of
Robert Dyer of Aberglasney, in Caermarthenshire, a solicitor of
great capacity and note.  He passed through Westminster school under
the care of Dr. Freind, and was then called home to be instructed in
his father's profession.  But his father died soon, and he took no
delight in the study of the law; but, having always amused himself
with drawing, resolved to turn painter, and became pupil to Mr.
Richardson, an artist then of high reputation, but now better known
by his books than by his pictures.

Having studied a while under his master, he became, as he tells his
friend, an itinerant painter, and wandered about South Wales and the
parts adjacent; but he mingled poetry with painting, and about 1727
[1726] printed "Grongar Hill" in Lewis's Miscellany.  Being,
probably, unsatisfied with his own proficiency, he, like other
painters, travelled to Italy; and coming back in 1740, published the
"Ruins of Rome."  If his poem was written soon after his return, he
did not make use of his acquisitions in painting, whatever they
might be; for decline of health and love of study determined him to
the Church.  He therefore entered into orders; and, it seems,
married about the same time a lady of the name of Ensor; "whose
grandmother," says he, "was a Shakspeare, descended from a brother
of everybody's Shakspeare;" by her, in 1756, he had a son and three
daughters living.

His ecclesiastical provision was for a long time but slender.  His
first patron, Mr. Harper, gave him, in 1741, Calthorp in
Leicestershire, of eighty pounds a year, on which he lived ten
years, and then exchanged it for Belchford, in Lincolnshire, of
seventy-five.  His condition now began to mend.  In 1751 Sir John
Heathcote gave him Coningsby, of one hundred and forty pounds a
year; and in 1755 the Chancellor added Kirkby, of one hundred and
ten.  He complains that the repair of the house at Coningsby, and
other expenses, took away the profit.  In 1757 he published "The
Fleece," his greatest poetical work; of which I will not suppress a
ludicrous story.  Dodsley the bookseller was one day mentioning it
to a critical visitor, with more expectation of success than the
other could easily admit.  In the conversation the author's age was
asked; and being represented as advanced in life, "He will," said
the critic, "be buried in woollen."  He did not indeed long survive
that publication, nor long enjoy the increase of his preferments,
for in 1758 he died.

Dyer is not a poet of bulk or dignity sufficient to require an
elaborate criticism.  "Grongar Hill" is the happiest of his
productions:  it is not indeed very accurately written; but the
scenes which it displays are so pleasing, the images which they
raise are so welcome to the mind, and the reflections of the writer
so consonant to the general sense or experience of mankind, that
when it is once read, it will be read again.  The idea of the "Ruins
of Rome" strikes more, but pleases less, and the title raises
greater expectation than the performance gratifies.  Some passages,
however, are conceived with the mind of a poet; as when, in the
neighbourhood of dilapidating edifices, he says,

                          "The Pilgrim oft
      At dead of night, 'mid his orison hears
      Aghast the voice of Time, disparting tow'rs
      Tumbling all precipitate down dashed,
      Rattling around, loud thund'ring to the Moon."

Of "The Fleece," which never became popular, and is now universally
neglected, I can say little that is likely to recall it to
attention.  The woolcomber and the poet appear to me such discordant
natures, that an attempt to bring them together is to COUPLE THE
SERPENT WITH THE FOWL.  When Dyer, whose mind was not unpoetical,
has done his utmost, by interesting his reader in our native
commodity by interspersing rural imagery, and incidental
digressions, by clothing small images in great words, and by all the
writer's arts of delusion, the meanness naturally adhering, and the
irreverence habitually annexed to trade and manufacture, sink him
under insuperable oppression; and the disgust which blank verse,
encumbering and encumbered, superadds to an unpleasing subject, soon
repels the reader, however willing to be pleased.

Let me, however, honestly report whatever may counterbalance this
weight of censure.  I have been told that Akenside, who, upon a
poetical question, has a right to be heard, said, "That he would
regulate his opinion of the reigning taste by the fate of Dyer's
'Fleece;' for, if that were ill-received, he should not think it any
longer reasonable to expect fame from excellence."



SHENSTONE.



William Shenstone, the son of Thomas Shenstone and Anne Pen, was
born in November, 1714, at the Leasowes in Hales-Owen, one of those
insulated districts which, in the division of the kingdom, was
appended, for some reason not now discoverable, to a distant county;
and which, though surrounded by Warwickshire and Worcestershire,
belongs to Shropshire, though perhaps thirty miles distant from any
other part of it.  He learned to read of an old dame, whom his poem
of the "Schoolmistress" has delivered to posterity; and soon
received such delight from books, that he was always calling for
fresh entertainment, and expected that, when any of the family went
to market, a new book should be brought him, which, when it came,
was in fondness carried to bed and laid by him.  It is said, that,
when his request had been neglected, his mother wrapped up a piece
of wood of the same form, and pacified him for the night.  As he
grew older, he went for a while to the Grammar-school in Hales-Owen,
and was placed afterwards with Mr. Crumpton, an eminent schoolmaster
at Solihul, where he distinguished himself by the quickness of his
progress.

When he was young (June, 1724) he was deprived of his father, and
soon after (August, 1726) of his grandfather; and was, with his
brother, who died afterwards unmarried, left to the care of his
grandmother, who managed the estate.

From school he was sent in 1732 to Pembroke College in Oxford, a
society which for half a century has been eminent for English poetry
and elegant literature.  Here it appears that he found delight and
advantage; for he continued his name in the book ten years, though
he took no degree.  After the first four years he put on the
civilian's gown, but without showing any intention to engage in the
profession.  About the time when he went to Oxford, the death of his
grandmother devolved his affairs to the care of the Rev. Mr. Dolman,
of Brome in Staffordshire, whose attention he always mentioned with
gratitude.  At Oxford he employed himself upon English poetry; and
in 1737 published a small Miscellany, without his name.  He then for
a time wandered about, to acquaint himself with life, and was
sometimes at London, sometimes at Bath, or any other place of public
resort; but he did not forget his poetry.  He published in 1741 his
"Judgment of Hercules," addressed to Mr. Lyttelton, whose interest
he supported with great warmth at an election:  this was next year
followed by the "Schoolmistress."

Mr. Dolman, to whose care he was indebted for his ease and leisure,
died in 1745, and the care of his own fortune now fell upon him.  He
tried to escape it awhile, and lived at his house with his tenants,
who were distantly related; but, finding that imperfect possession
inconvenient, he took the whole estate into his own hands, more to
the improvement of its beauty than the increase of its produce.  Now
was excited his delight in rural pleasures and his ambition of rural
elegance; he began from this time to point his prospects, to
diversify his surface, to entangle his walks, and to wind his
waters, which he did with such judgment and such fancy as made his
little domain the envy of the great and the admiration of the
skilful; a place to be visited by travellers and copied by
designers.  Whether to plant a walk in undulating curves, and to
place a bench at every turn where there is an object to catch the
view, to make the water run where it will be heard, and to stagnate
where it will be seen, to leave intervals where the eye will be
pleased, and to thicken the plantation where there is something to
be hidden, demands any great powers of mind, I will not inquire:
perhaps a sullen and surly spectator may think such performances
rather the sport than the business of human reason.  But it must be
at least confessed that to embellish the form of Nature is an
innocent amusement, and some praise must be allowed, by the most
supercilious observer, to him who does best what such multitudes are
contending to do well.

This praise was the praise of Shenstone; but, like all other modes
of felicity, it was not enjoyed without its abatements.  Lyttelton
was his neighbour and his rival, whose empire, spacious and opulent,
looked with disdain on the PETTY STATE that APPEARED BEHIND IT.  For
a while the inhabitants of Hagley affected to tell their
acquaintance of the little fellow that was trying to make himself
admired; but when by degrees the Leasowes forced themselves into
notice, they took care to defeat the curiosity which they could not
suppress by conducting their visitants perversely to inconvenient
points of view, and introducing them at the wrong end of a walk to
detect a deception; injuries of which Shenstone would heavily
complain.  Where there is emulation there will be vanity; and where
there is vanity there will be folly.

The pleasure of Shenstone was all in his eye; he valued what he
valued merely for its looks.  Nothing raised his indignation more
than to ask if there were any fishes in his water.  His house was
mean, and he did not improve it; his care was of his grounds.  When
he came home from his walks, he might find his floors flooded by a
shower through the broken roof; but could spare no money for its
reparation.  In time his expenses brought clamours about him that
overpowered the lamb's bleat and the linnet's song, and his groves
were haunted by beings very different from fauns and fairies.  He
spent his estate in adorning it, and his death was probably hastened
by his anxieties.  He was a lamp that spent its oil in blazing.  It
is said that, if he had lived a little longer, he would have been
assisted by a pension:  such bounty could not have been ever more
properly bestowed; but that it was ever asked is not certain; it is
too certain that it never was enjoyed.  He died at Leasowes, of a
putrid fever, about five on Friday morning, February 11, 1763, and
was buried by the side of his brother in the churchyard of Hales-
Owen.

He was never married, though he might have obtained the lady,
whoever she was, to whom his "Pastoral Ballad" was addressed.  He is
represented by his friend Dodsley as a man of great tenderness and
generosity, kind to all that were within his influence; but, if once
offended, not easily appeased; inattentive to economy, and careless
of his expenses; in his person he was larger than the middle-size,
with something clumsy in his form; very negligent of his clothes,
and remarkable for wearing his grey hair in a particular manner, for
he held that the fashion was no rule of dress, and that every man
was to suit his appearance to his natural form.  His mind was not
very comprehensive, nor his curiosity active; he had no value for
those parts of knowledge which he had not himself cultivated.  His
life was unstained by any crime.  The "Elegy on Jesse," which has
been supposed to relate an unfortunate and criminal amour of his
own, was known by his friends to have been suggested by the story of
Miss Godfrey in Richardson's "Pamela."

What Gray thought of his character, from the perusal of his Letters,
was this:--

"I have read, too, an octavo volume of Shenstone's Letters.  Poor
man! he was always wishing for money, for fame, and other
distinctions; and his whole philosophy consisted in living against
his will in retirement, and in a place which his taste had adorned,
but which he only enjoyed when people of note came to see and
commend it.  His correspondence is about nothing else but this place
and his own writings, with two or three neighbouring clergymen, who
wrote verses too."

His poems consist of elegies, odes, and ballads, humorous sallies,
and moral pieces.  His conception of an Elegy he has in his Preface
very judiciously and discriminately explained.  It is, according to
his account, the effusion of a contemplative mind, sometimes
plaintive, and always serious, and therefore superior to the glitter
of slight ornaments.  His compositions suit not ill to this
description.  His topics of praise are the domestic virtues, and his
thoughts are pure and simple, but wanting combination; they want
variety.  The peace of solitude, the innocence of inactivity, and
the unenvied security of an humble station, can fill but a few
pages.  That of which the essence is uniformity will be soon
described.  His elegies have, therefore, too much resemblance of
each other.  The lines are sometimes, such as Elegy requires, smooth
and easy; but to this praise his claim is not constant; his diction
is often harsh, improper, and affected, his words ill-coined or ill-
chosen, and his phrase unskilfully inverted.

The Lyric Poems are almost all of the light and airy kind, such as
trip lightly and nimbly along, without the load of any weighty
meaning.  From these, however, "Rural Elegance" has some right to be
excepted.  I once heard it praised by a very learned lady; and,
though the lines are irregular, and the thoughts diffused with too
much verbosity, yet it cannot be denied to contain both
philosophical argument and poetical spirit.  Of the rest I cannot
think any excellent; the "Skylark" pleases me best, which has,
however, more of the epigram than of the ode.

But the four parts of his "Pastoral Ballad" demand particular
notice.  I cannot but regret that it is pastoral:  an intelligent
reader acquainted with the scenes of real life sickens at the
mention of the CROOK, the PIPE, the SHEEP, and the KIDS, which it is
not necessary to bring forward to notice; for the poet's art is
selection, and he ought to show the beauties without the grossness
of the country life.  His stanza seems to have been chosen in
imitation of Rowe's "Despairing Shepherd."  In the first are two
passages, to which if any mind denies its sympathy, it has no
acquaintance with love or nature:--

     "I prized every hour that went by,
        Beyond all that had pleased me before:
      But now they are past, and I sigh,
        And I grieve that I prized them no more.

      When forced the fair nymph to forego,
        What anguish I felt in my heart!
      Yet I thought (but it might not be so)
        'Twas with pain that she saw me depart.

      She gazed, as I slowly withdrew,
        My path I could hardly discern;
      So sweetly she bade me adieu,
        I thought that she bade me return."

In the second this passage has its prettiness; though it be not
equal to the former:--

     "I have found out a gift for my fair:
        I have found where the wood pigeons breed:
      But let me that plunder forbear,
        She will say 'twas a barbarous deed:

      For he ne'er could be true, she averred,
        Who could rob a poor bird of its young;
      And I loved her the more when I heard
        Such tenderness fall from her tongue."

In the third he mentions the common-places of amorous poetry with
some address:--

     "'Tis his with mock passion to glow!
        'Tis his in smooth tales to unfold,
      How her face is as bright as the snow,
        And her bosom, be sure, is as cold:

      How the nightingales labour the strain,
        With the notes of this charmer to vie:
      How they vary their accents in vain,
        Repine at her triumphs, and die."

In the fourth I find nothing better than this natural strain of
Hope:--

     "Alas! from the day that we met,
        What hope of an end to my woes,
      When I cannot endure to forget
        The glance that undid my repose?

      Yet Time may diminish the pain:
        The flower, and the shrub, and the tree,
      Which I reared for her pleasure in vain,
        In time may have comfort for me."

His "Levities" are by their title exempted from the severities of
criticism, yet it may be remarked in a few words that his humour is
sometimes gross, and seldom sprightly.

Of the Moral Poems, the first is the "Choice of Hercules," from
Xenophon.  The numbers are smooth, the diction elegant, and the
thoughts just; but something of vigour is still to be wished, which
it might have had by brevity and compression.  His "Fate of
Delicacy" has an air of gaiety, but not a very pointed and general
moral.  His blank verses, those that can read them, may probably
find to be like the blank verses of his neighbours.  "Love and
Honour" is derived from the old ballad, "Did you not hear of a
Spanish Lady?"--I wish it well enough to wish it were in rhyme.

The "Schoolmistress," of which I know not what claim it has to stand
among the Moral Works, is surely the most pleasing of Shenstone's
performances.  The adoption of a particular style, in light and
short compositions, contributes much to the increase of pleasure:
we are entertained at once with two imitations of nature in the
sentiments, of the original author in the style, and between them
the mind is kept in perpetual employment.

The general recommendation of Shenstone is easiness and simplicity;
his general defect is want of comprehension and variety.  Had his
mind been better stored with knowledge, whether he could have been
great, I know not; he could certainly have been agreeable.



YOUNG.



The following life was written, at my request, by a gentleman (Mr.
Herbert Croft) who had better information than I could easily have
obtained; and the public will perhaps wish that I had solicited and
obtained more such favours from him:--

"Dear Sir,--In consequence of our different conversations about
authentic materials for the Life of Young, I send you the following
details:"--

Of great men something must always be said to gratify curiosity.  Of
the illustrious author of the "Night Thoughts" much has been told of
which there never could have been proofs, and little care appears to
have been taken to tell that of which proofs, with little trouble,
might have been procured.

Edward Young was born at Upham, near Winchester, in June, 1681.  He
was the son of Edward Young, at that time Fellow of Winchester
College, and Rector of Upham, who was the son of Jo. Young, of
Woodhay, in Berkshire, styled by Wood, GENTLEMAN.  In September,
1682, the poet's father was collated to the prebend of Gillingham
Minor, in the church of Sarum, by Bishop Ward.  When Ward's
faculties were impaired through age, his duties were necessarily
performed by others.  We learn from Wood that, at a visitation of
Sprat's, July the 12th, 1686, the prebendary preached a Latin
sermon, afterwards published, with which the Bishop was so pleased,
that he told the chapter he was concerned to find the preacher had
one of the worst prebends in their Church.  Some time after this, in
consequence of his merit and reputation, or of the interest of Lord
Bradford, to whom, in 1702, he dedicated two volumes of sermons, he
was appointed chaplain to King William and Queen Mary, and preferred
to the Deanery of Sarum.  Jacob, who wrote in 1720, says, "he was
Chaplain and Clerk of the Closet to the late Queen, who honoured him
by standing godmother to the poet."  His Fellowship of Winchester he
resigned in favour of a gentleman of the name of Harris, who married
his only daughter.  The Dean died at Sarum, after a short illness,
in 1705, in the sixty-third year of his age.  On the Sunday after
his decease, Bishop Burnet preached at the cathedral, and began his
sermon with saying, "Death has been of late walking round us, and
making breach upon breach upon us, and has now carried away the head
of this body with a stroke, so that he, whom you saw a week ago
distributing the holy mysteries, is now laid in the dust.  But he
still lives in the many excellent directions he has left us both how
to live and how to die."

The dean placed his son upon the foundation at Winchester College,
where he had himself been educated.  At this school Edward Young
remained till the election after his eighteenth birthday, the period
at which those upon the foundation are superannuated.  Whether he
did not betray his abilities early in life, or his masters had not
skill enough to discover in their pupil any marks of genius for
which he merited reward, or no vacancy at Oxford offered them an
opportunity to bestow upon him the reward provided for merit by
William of Wykeham; certain it is, that to an Oxford fellowship our
poet did not succeed.  By chance, or by choice, New College cannot
claim the honour of numbering among its fellows him who wrote the
"Night Thoughts."

On the 13th of October, 1703, he was entered an independent member
of New College, that he might live at little expense in the warden's
lodgings, who was a particular friend of his father's, till he
should be qualified to stand for a fellowship at All Souls.  In a
few months the warden of New College died.  He then removed to
Corpus College.  The president of this society, from regard also for
his father, invited him thither, in order to lessen his academical
expenses.  In 1708 he was nominated to a law-fellowship at All Souls
by Archbishop Tenison, into whose hands it came by devolution.  Such
repeated patronage, while it justifies Burnet's praise of the
father, reflects credit on the conduct of the son.  The manner in
which it was exerted seems to prove that the father did not leave
behind him much wealth.

On the 23rd of April, 1714, Young took his degree of bachelor of
civil laws, and his doctor's degree on the 10th of June, 1719.  Soon
after he went to Oxford he discovered, it is said, an inclination
for pupils.  Whether he ever commenced tutor is not known.  None has
hitherto boasted to have received his academical instruction from
the author of "Night Thoughts."  It is probable that his College was
proud of him no less as a scholar than as a poet; for in 1716, when
the foundation of the Codrington Library was laid, two years after
he had taken his bachelor's degree, Young was appointed to speak the
Latin oration.  This is at least particular for being dedicated in
English "To the Ladies of the Codrington Family."  To these ladies
he says "that he was unavoidably flung into a singularity, by being
obliged to write an epistle dedicatory void of commonplace, and such
an one was never published before by any author whatever; that this
practice absolved them from any obligation of reading what was
presented to them; and that the bookseller approved of it, because
it would make people stare, was absurd enough and perfectly right."
Of this oration there is no appearance in his own edition of his
works; and prefixed to an edition by Curll and Tonson, in 1741, is a
letter from Young to Curll, if we may credit Curll, dated December
the 9th, 1739, wherein he says that he has not leisure to review
what he formerly wrote, and adds, "I have not the 'Epistle to Lord
Lansdowne.'  If you will take my advice, I would have you omit that,
and the oration on Codrington.  I think the collection will sell
better without them."

There are who relate that, when first Young found himself
independent, and his own master at All Souls, he was not the
ornament to religion and morality which he afterwards became.  The
authority of his father, indeed, had ceased, some time before, by
his death; and Young was certainly not ashamed to be patronised by
the infamous Wharton.  But Wharton befriended in Young, perhaps, the
poet, and particularly the tragedian.  If virtuous authors must be
patronised only by virtuous peers, who shall point them out?  Yet
Pope is said by Ruffhead to have told Warburton that "Young had much
of a sublime genius, though without common sense; so that his
genius, having no guide, was perpetually liable to degenerate into
bombast.  This made him pass a FOOLISH YOUTH, the sport of peers and
poets:  but his having a very good heart enabled him to support the
clerical character when he assumed it, first with decency, and
afterwards with honour."

They who think ill of Young's morality in the early part of his life
may perhaps be wrong; but Tindal could not err in his opinion of
Young's warmth and ability in the cause of religion.  Tindal used to
spend much of his time at All Souls.  "The other boys," said the
atheist, "I can always answer, because I always know whence they
have their arguments, which I have read a hundred times; but that
fellow Young is continually pestering me with something of his own."

After all, Tindal and the censurers of Young may be reconcilable.
Young might, for two or three years, have tried that kind of life,
in which his natural principles would not suffer him to wallow long.
If this were so, he has left behind him not only his evidence in
favour of virtue, but the potent testimony of experience against
vice.  We shall soon see that one of his earliest productions was
more serious than what comes from the generality of unfledged poets.

Young perhaps ascribed the good fortune of Addison to the "Poem to
his Majesty," presented with a copy of verses, to Somers:  and hoped
that he also might soar to wealth and honours on wings of the same
kind.  His first poetical flight was when Queen Anne called up to
the House of Lords the sons of the Earls of Northampton and
Aylesbury, and added, in one day, ten others to the number of Peers.
In order to reconcile the people to one, at least, of the new lords,
he published, in 1712, "An Epistle to the Right Honourable George
Lord Lansdowne."  In this composition the poet pours out his
panegyric with the extravagance of a young man, who thinks his
present stock of wealth will never be exhausted.  The poem seems
intended also to reconcile the public to the late peace.  This is
endeavoured to be done by showing that men are slain in war, and
that in peace "harvests wave, and commerce swells her sail."  If
this be humanity, for which he meant it, is it politics?  Another
purpose of this epistle appears to have been to prepare the public
for the reception of some tragedy he might have in hand.  His
lordship's patronage, he says, will not let him "repent his passion
for the stage;" and the particular praise bestowed on Othello and
Oroonoko looks as if some such character as Zanga was even then in
contemplation.  The affectionate mention of the death of his friend
Harrison of New College, at the close of this poem, is an instance
of Young's art, which displayed itself so wonderfully some time
afterwards in the "Night Thoughts," of making the public a party in
his private sorrow.  Should justice call upon you to censure this
poem, it ought at least to be remembered that he did not insert it
in his works; and that in the letter to Curll, as we have seen, he
advises its omission.  The booksellers, in the late body of English
poetry, should have distinguished what was deliberately rejected by
the respective authors.  This I shall be careful to do with regard
to Young.  "I think," says he, "the following pieces in FOUR volumes
to be the most excusable of all that I have written; and I wish LESS
APOLOGY was less needful for these.  As there is no recalling what
is got abroad, the pieces here republished I have revised and
corrected, and rendered them as PARDONABLE as it was in my power to
do."

Shall the gates of repentance be shut only against literary sinners?

When Addison published "Cato" in 1713, Young had the honour of
prefixing to it a recommendatory copy of verses.  This is one of the
pieces which the author of the "Night Thoughts" did not republish.

On the appearance of his poem on the "Last Day," Addison did not
return Young's compliment; but "The Englishman" of October 29, 1713,
which was probably written by Addison, speaks handsomely of this
poem.  The "Last Day" was published soon after the peace.  The Vice-
Chancellor's imprimatur (for it was printed at Oxford) is dated the
19th, 1713.  From the exordium, Young appears to have spent some
time on the composition of it.  While other bards "with Britain's
hero set their souls on fire," he draws, he says, a deeper scene.
Marlborough HAD BEEN considered by Britain as her HERO; but, when
the "Last Day" was published, female cabal had blasted for a time
the laurels of Blenheim.  This serious poem was finished by Young as
early as 1710, before he was thirty; for part of it is printed in
the Tatler.  It was inscribed to the queen, in a dedication, which,
for some reason, he did not admit into his works.  It tells her that
his only title to the great honour he now does himself is the
obligation which he formerly received from her royal indulgence.  Of
this obligation nothing is now known, unless he alluded to her being
his godmother.  He is said indeed to have been engaged at a settled
stipend as a writer for the Court.  In Swift's "Rhapsody on Poetry"
are these lines, speaking of the Court:--

     "Whence Gay was banished in disgrace,
      Where Pope will never show his face,
      Where Y---- must torture his invention
      To flatter knaves, or lose his pension."

That Y---- means Young seems clear from four other lines in the same
poem:--

     "Attend, ye Popes, and Youngs, and Gays,
      And tune your harps and strew your bays;
      Your panegyrics here provide;
      You cannot err on flattery's side."

Yet who shall say with certainty that Young was a pensioner?  In all
modern periods of this country, have not the writers on one side
been regularly called Hirelings, and on the other Patriots?

Of the dedication the complexion is clearly political.  It speaks in
the highest terms of the late peace; it gives her Majesty praise
indeed for her victories, but says that the author is more pleased
to see her rise from this lower world, soaring above the clouds,
passing the first and second heavens, and leaving the fixed stars
behind her; nor will he lose her there, he says, but keep her still
in view through the boundless spaces on the other side of creation,
in her journey towards eternal bliss, till he behold the heaven of
heavens open, and angels receiving and conveying her still onward
from the stretch of his imagination, which tires in her pursuit, and
falls back again to earth.

The queen was soon called away from this lower world, to a place
where human praise or human flattery, even less general than this,
are of little consequence.  If Young thought the dedication
contained only the praise of truth, he should not have omitted it in
his works.  Was he conscious of the exaggeration of party?  Then he
should not have written it.  The poem itself is not without a glance
towards politics, notwithstanding the subject.  The cry that the
Church was in danger had not yet subsided.  The "Last Day," written
by a layman, was much approved by the ministry and their friends.

Before the queen's death, "The Force of Religion, or Vanquished
Love," was sent into the world.  This poem is founded on the
execution of Lady Jane Grey and her husband, Lord Guildford, 1554, a
story chosen for the subject of a tragedy by Edmund Smith, and
wrought into a tragedy by Rowe.  The dedication of it to the
Countess of Salisbury does not appear in his own edition.  He hopes
it may be some excuse for his presumption that the story could not
have been read without thoughts of the Countess of Salisbury, though
it had been dedicated to another.  "To behold," he proceeds, "a
person ONLY virtuous, stirs in us a prudent regret; to behold a
person ONLY amiable to the sight, warms us with a religious
indignation; but to turn our eyes to a Countess of Salisbury, gives
us pleasure and improvement; it works a sort of miracle, occasions
the bias of our nature to fall off from sin, and makes our very
senses and affections converts to our religion, and promoters of our
duty."  His flattery was as ready for the other sex as for ours, and
was at least as well adapted.

August the 27th, 1714, Pope writes to his friend Jervas, that he is
just arrived from Oxford; that every one is much concerned for the
queen's death, but that no panegyrics are ready yet for the king.
Nothing like friendship has yet taken place between Pope and Young,
for, soon after the event which Pope mentions, Young published a
poem on the queen's death, and his Majesty's accession to the
throne.  It is inscribed to Addison, then secretary to the Lords
Justices.  Whatever were the obligations which he had formerly
received from Anne, the poet appears to aim at something of the same
sort from George.  Of the poem the intention seems to have been, to
show that he had the same extravagant strain of praise for a king as
for a queen.  To discover, at the very onset of a foreigner's reign,
that the gods bless his new subjects in such a king is something
more than praise.  Neither was this deemed one of his excusable
pieces.  We do not find it in his works.

Young's father had been well acquainted with Lady Anne Wharton, the
first wife of Thomas Wharton, Esq., afterwards Marquis of Wharton; a
lady celebrated for her poetical talents by Burnet and by Waller.

To the Dean of Sarum's visitation sermon, already mentioned, were
added some verses "by that excellent poetess, Mrs. Anne Wharton,"
upon its being translated into English, at the instance of Waller by
Atwood.  Wharton, after he became ennobled, did not drop the son of
his old friend.  In him, during the short time he lived, Young found
a patron, and in his dissolute descendant a friend and a companion.
The marquis died in April, 1715.  In the beginning of the next year,
the young marquis set out upon his travels, from which he returned
in about a twelvemonth.  The beginning of 1717 carried him to
Ireland:  where, says the Biographia, "on the score of his
extraordinary qualities, he had the honour done him of being
admitted, though under age, to take his seat in the House of Lords."
With this unhappy character it is not unlikely that Young went to
Ireland.  From his letter to Richardson on "Original Composition,"
it is clear he was, at some period of his life, in that country.  "I
remember," says he, in that letter, speaking of Swift, "as I and
others were taking with him an evening walk, about a mile out of
Dublin, he stopped short; we passed on; but perceiving he did not
follow us, I went back, and found him fixed as a statue, and
earnestly gazing upward at a noble elm, which in its uppermost
branches was much withered and decayed.  Pointing at it, he said, 'I
shall be like that tree, I shall die at top.'"  Is it not probable,
that this visit to Ireland was paid when he had an opportunity of
going thither with his avowed friend and patron?

From "The Englishman" it appears that a tragedy by Young was in the
theatre so early as 1713.  Yet Busiris was not brought upon Drury
Lane stage till 1719.  It was inscribed to the Duke of Newcastle,
"because the late instances he had received of his grace's
undeserved and uncommon favour, in an affair of some consequence,
foreign to the theatre, had taken from him the privilege of choosing
a patron."  The Dedication he afterwards suppressed.

Busiris was followed in the year 1721 by The Revenge.  He dedicated
this famous tragedy to the Duke of Wharton.  "Your Grace," says the
Dedication, "has been pleased to make yourself accessory to the
following scenes, not only by suggesting the most beautiful incident
in them, but by making all possible provision for the success of the
whole."  That his grace should have suggested the incident to which
he alludes, whatever that incident might have been, is not unlikely.
The last mental exertion of the superannuated young man, in his
quarters at Lerida, in Spain, was some scenes of a tragedy on the
story of Mary Queen of Scots.

Dryden dedicated "Marriage a la Mode" to Wharton's infamous relation
Rochester, whom he acknowledges not only as the defender of his
poetry, but as the promoter of his fortune.  Young concludes his
address to Wharton thus--"My present fortune is his bounty, and my
future his care; which I will venture to say will be always
remembered to his honour, since he, I know, intended his generosity
as an encouragement to merit, though through his very pardonable
partiality to one who bears him so sincere a duty and respect, I
happen to receive the benefit of it."  That he ever had such a
patron as Wharton, Young took all the pains in his power to conceal
from the world, by excluding this dedication from his works.  He
should have remembered that he at the same time concealed his
obligation to Wharton for THE MOST BEAUTIFUL INCIDENT in what is
surely not his least beautiful composition.  The passage just quoted
is, in a poem afterwards addressed to Walpole, literally copied:

     "Be this thy partial smile from censure free!
      'Twas meant for merit, though it fell on me."

While Young, who, in his "Love of Fame," complains grievously how
often "dedications wash an AEthiop white," was painting an amiable
Duke of Wharton in perishable prose, Pope was, perhaps, beginning to
describe the "scorn and wonder of his days" in lasting verse.  To
the patronage of such a character, had Young studied men as much as
Pope, he would have known how little to have trusted.  Young,
however, was certainly indebted to it for something material; and
the duke's regard for Young, added to his lust of praise, procured
to All Souls College a donation, which was not forgotten by the poet
when he dedicated The Revenge.

It will surprise you to see me cite second Atkins, Case 136, Stiles
versus the Attorney-General, March 14, 1740, as authority for the
life of a poet.  But biographers do not always find such certain
guides as the oaths of the persons whom they record.  Chancellor
Hardwicke was to determine whether two annuities, granted by the
Duke of Wharton to Young, were for legal considerations.  One was
dated the 24th March, 1719, and accounted for his grace's bounty in
a style princely and commendable, if not legal--"considering that
the public good is advanced by the encouragement of learning and the
polite arts, and being pleased therein with the attempts of Dr.
Young, in consideration thereof, and of the love I bear him, etc."
The other was dated the 10th of July, 1722.

Young, on his examination, swore that he quitted the Exeter family,
and refused an annuity of 100 pounds which had been offered him for
life if he would continue tutor to Lord Burleigh, upon the pressing
solicitations of the Duke of Wharton, and his grace's assurances of
providing for him in a much more ample manner.  It also appeared
that the duke had given him a bond for 600 pounds dated the 15th of
March, 1721, in consideration of his taking several journeys, and
being at great expenses, in order to be chosen member of the House
of Commons, at the duke's desire, and in consideration of his not
taking two livings of 200 pounds and 400 pounds in the gift of All
Souls College, on his grace's promises of serving and advancing him
in the world.

Of his adventures in the Exeter family I am unable to give any
account.  The attempt to get into Parliament was at Cirencester,
where Young stood a contested election.  His grace discovered in him
talents for oratory as well as for poetry.  Nor was this judgment
wrong.  Young, after he took orders, became a very popular preacher,
and was much followed for the grace and animation of his delivery.
By his oratorical talents he was once in his life, according to the
Biographia, deserted.  As he was preaching in his turn at St.
James's, he plainly perceived it was out of his power to command the
attention of his audience.  This so affected the feelings of the
preacher, that he sat back in the pulpit, and burst into tears.  But
we must pursue his poetical life.

In 1719 he lamented the death of Addison, in a letter addressed to
their common friend Tickell.  For the secret history of the
following lines, if they contain any, it is now vain to seek:

     "IN JOY ONCE JOINED, in sorrow, now, for years--
      Partner in grief, and brother of my tears,
      Tickell, accept this verse, thy mournful due."

From your account of Tickell it appears that he and Young used to
"communicate to each other whatever verses they wrote, even to the
least things."

In 1719 appeared a "Paraphrase on Part of the Book of Job."  Parker,
to whom it is dedicated, had not long, by means of the seals, been
qualified for a patron.  Of this work the author's opinion may be
known from his letter to Curll:  "You seem, in the Collection you
propose, to have omitted what I think may claim the first place in
it; I mean 'a Translation from part of Job,' printed by Mr. Tonson."
The Dedication, which was only suffered to appear in Mr. Tonson's
edition, while it speaks with satisfaction of his present
retirement, seems to make an unusual struggle to escape from
retirement.  But every one who sings in the dark does not sing from
joy.  It is addressed, in no common strain of flattery, to a
chancellor, of whom he clearly appears to have had no kind of
knowledge.

Of his Satires it would not have been possible to fix the dates
without the assistance of first editions, which, as you had occasion
to observe in your account of Dryden, are with difficulty found.  We
must then have referred to the poems, to discover when they were
written.  For these internal notes of time we should not have
referred in vain.  The first Satire laments, that "Guilt's chief foe
in Addison is fled."  The second, addressing himself, asks:--

     "Is thy ambition sweating for a rhyme,
      Thou unambitious fool, at this late time?
      A fool at FORTY is a fool indeed."

The Satires were originally published separately in folio, under the
title of "The Universal Passion."  These passages fix the appearance
of the first to about 1725, the time at which it came out.  As Young
seldom suffered his pen to dry after he had once dipped it in
poetry, we may conclude that he began his Satires soon after he had
written the "Paraphrase on Job."  The last Satire was certainly
finished in the beginning of the year 1726.  In December, 1725, the
King, in his passage from Helvoetsluys, escaped with great
difficulty from a storm by landing at Rye; and the conclusion of the
Satire turns the escape into a miracle, in such an encomiastic
strain of compliment as poetry too often seeks to pay to royalty.
From the sixth of these poems we learn,

     "'Midst empire's charms, how Carolina's heart
      Glowed with the love of virtue and of art."

Since the grateful poet tells us, in the next couplet,

     "Her favour is diffused to that degree,
      Excess of goodness! it has dawned on me."

Her Majesty had stood godmother, and given her name, to the daughter
of the lady whom Young married in 1731; and had perhaps shown some
attention to Lady Elizabeth's future husband.

The fifth Satire, "On Women," was not published till 1727; and the
sixth not till 1728.

To these poems, when, in 1728, he gathered them into one
publication, he prefixed a Preface, in which he observes that "no
man can converse much in the world, but at what he meets with he
must either be insensible or grieve, or be angry or smile.  Now to
smile at it, and turn it into ridicule," he adds, "I think most
eligible, as it hurts ourselves least, and gives vice and folly the
greatest offence.  Laughing at the misconduct of the world will, in
a great measure, ease us of any more disagreeable passion about it.
One passion is more effectually driven out by another than by
reason, whatever some teach."  So wrote, and so of course thought,
the lively and witty satirist at the grave age of almost fifty, who,
many years earlier in life, wrote the "Last Day."  After all, Swift
pronounced of these Satires, that they should either have been more
angry or more merry.

Is it not somewhat singular that Young preserved, without any
palliation, this Preface, so bluntly decisive in favour of laughing
at the world, in the same collection of his works which contains the
mournful, angry, gloomy "Night Thoughts!"  At the conclusion of the
Preface he applies Plato's beautiful fable of the "Birth of Love" to
modern poetry, with the addition, "that Poetry, like Love, is a
little subject to blindness, which makes her mistake her way to
preferments and honours; and that she retains a dutiful admiration
of her father's family; but divides her favours, and generally lives
with her mother's relations."  Poetry, it is true, did not lead
Young to preferments or to honours; but was there not something like
blindness in the flattery which he sometimes forced her, and her
sister Prose, to utter?  She was always, indeed, taught by him to
entertain a most dutiful admiration of riches; but surely Young,
though nearly related to Poetry, had no connection with her whom
Plato makes the mother of Love.  That he could not well complain of
being related to Poverty appears clearly from the frequent bounties
which his gratitude records, and from the wealth which he left
behind him.  By "The Universal Passion" he acquired no vulgar
fortune--more than three thousand pounds.  A considerable sum had
already been swallowed up in the South Sea.  For this loss he took
the vengeance of an author.  His Muse makes poetical use more than
once of a South Sea Dream.

It is related by Mr. Spence, in his "Manuscript Anecdotes," on the
authority of Mr. Rawlinson, that Young, upon the publication of his
"Universal Passion," received from the Duke of Grafton two thousand
pounds; and that, when one of his friends exclaimed, "Two thousand
pounds for a poem!" he said it was the best bargain he ever made in
his life, for the poem was worth four thousand.  This story may be
true; but it seems to have been raised from the two answers of Lord
Burghley and Sir Philip Sidney in Spenser's Life.

After inscribing his Satires, not perhaps without the hopes of
preferments and honours, to such names as the Duke of Dorset, Mr.
Dodington, Mr. Spencer Compton, Lady Elizabeth Germain, and Sir
Robert Walpole, he returns to plain panegyric.  In 1726 he addressed
a poem to Sir Robert Walpole, of which the title sufficiently
explains the intention.  If Young must be acknowledged a ready
celebrator, he did not endeavour, or did not choose, to be a lasting
one.  "The Instalment" is among the pieces he did not admit into the
number of his EXCUSABLE WRITINGS.  Yet it contains a couplet which
pretends to pant after the power of bestowing immortality:--

     "Oh! how I long, enkindled by the theme,
      In deep eternity to launch thy name!"

The bounty of the former reign seems to have been continued,
possibly increased, in this.  Whatever it might have been, the poet
thought he deserved it; for he was not ashamed to acknowledge what,
without his acknowledgment, would now perhaps never have been
known:--

     "My breast, O Walpole, glows with grateful fire.
      The streams of royal bounty, turned by thee,
      Refresh the dry remains of poesy."

If the purity of modern patriotism will term Young a pensioner, it
must at least be confessed he was a grateful one.

The reign of the new monarch was ushered in by Young with "Ocean, an
Ode."  The hint of it was taken from the royal speech, which
recommended the increase and the encouragement of the seamen; that
they might be "invited, rather than compelled by force and violence,
to enter into the service of their country"--a plan which humanity
must lament that policy has not even yet been able, or willing, to
carry into execution.  Prefixed to the original publication were an
"Ode to the King, Pater Patriae," and an "Essay on Lyric Poetry."
It is but justice to confess that he preserved neither of them; and
that the Ode itself, which in the first edition, and in the last,
consists of seventy-three stanzas, in the author's own edition is
reduced to forty-nine.  Among the omitted passages is a "Wish," that
concluded the poem, which few would have suspected Young of forming;
and of which few, after having formed it, would confess something
like their shame by suppression.  It stood originally so high in the
author's opinion, that he entitled the poem, "Ocean, an Ode.
Concluding with a Wish."  This wish consists of thirteen stanzas.
The first runs thus:--

        "O may I STEAL
         Along the VALE
      Of humble life, secure from foes!
         My friend sincere,
         My judgment clear,
      And gentle business my repose!"

The three last stanzas are not more remarkable for just rhymes; but,
altogether, they will make rather a curious page in the life of
Young:--

        "Prophetic schemes,
         And golden dreams,
      May I, unsanguine, cast away!
         Have what I HAVE,
         And live, not LEAVE,
      Enamoured of the present day!

        "My hours my own!
         My faults unknown!
      My chief revenue in content!
         Then leave one BEAM
         Of honest FAME!
      And scorn the laboured monument!

        "Unhurt my urn
         Till that great TURN
      When mighty Nature's self shall die,
         Time cease to glide,
         With human pride,
      Sunk in the ocean of eternity!"

It is whimsical that he, who was soon to bid adieu to rhyme, should
fix upon a measure in which rhyme abounds even to satiety.  Of this
he said, in his "Essay on Lyric Poetry," prefixed to the poem--" For
the more harmony likewise I chose the frequent return of rhyme,
which laid me under great difficulties.  But difficulties overcome
give grace and pleasure.  Nor can I account for the PLEASURE OF
RHYME IN GENERAL (of which the moderns are too fond) but from this
truth."  Yet the moderns surely deserve not much censure for their
fondness of what, by their own confession, affords pleasure, and
abounds in harmony.  The next paragraph in his Essay did not occur
to him when he talked of "that great turn" in the stanza just
quoted.  "But then the writer must take care that the difficulty is
overcome.  That is, he must make rhyme consistent with as perfect
sense and expression as could be expected if he was perfectly free
from that shackle."  Another part of this Essay will convict the
following stanza of what every reader will discover in it
"involuntary burlesque:--

        "The northern blast,
         The shattered mast,
      The syrt, the whirlpool, and the rock,
         The breaking spout,
         The STARS GONE OUT,
      The boiling strait, the monster's shock."

But would the English poets fill quite so many volumes if all their
productions were to be tried, like this, by an elaborate essay on
each particular species of poetry of which they exhibit specimens?

If Young be not a lyric poet, he is at least a critic in that sort
of poetry; and, if his lyric poetry can be proved bad, it was first
proved so by his own criticism.  This surely is candid.

Milbourne was styled by Pope "the fairest of critics," only because
he exhibited his own version of "Virgil" to be compared with
Dryden's, which he condemned, and with which every reader had it not
otherwise in his power to compare it.  Young was surely not the most
unfair of poets for prefixing to a lyric composition an "Essay on
Lyric Poetry," so just and impartial as to condemn himself.

We shall soon come to a work, before which we find indeed no
critical essay, but which disdains to shrink from the touchstone of
the severest critic; and which certainly, as I remember to have
heard you say, if it contains some of the worst, contains also some
of the best things in the language.

Soon after the appearance of "Ocean," when he was almost fifty,
Young entered into orders.  In April, 1728, not long after he had
put on the gown, he was appointed chaplain to George II.

The tragedy of The Brothers, which was already in rehearsal, he
immediately withdrew from the stage.  The managers resigned it with
some reluctance to the delicacy of the new clergyman.  The Epilogue
to The Brothers, the only appendages to any of his three plays which
he added himself, is, I believe, the only one of the kind.  He calls
it an historical Epilogue.  Finding that "Guilt's dreadful close his
narrow scene denied," he, in a manner, continues the tragedy in the
Epilogue, and relates how Rome revenged the shade of Demetrius, and
punished Perseus "for this night's deed."

Of Young's taking orders something is told by the biographer of
Pope, which places the easiness and simplicity of the poet in a
singular light.  When he determined on the Church he did not address
himself to Sherlock, to Atterbury, or to Hare, for the best
instructions in theology, but to Pope, who, in a youthful frolic,
advised the diligent perusal of Thomas Aquinas.  With this treasure
Young retired from interruption to an obscure place in the suburbs.
His poetical guide to godliness hearing nothing of him during half a
year, and apprehending he might have carried the jest too far,
sought after him, and found him just in time to prevent what
Ruffhead calls "an irretrievable derangement."

That attachment to his favourite study, which made him think a poet
the surest guide to his new profession left him little doubt whether
poetry was the surest path to its honours and preferments.  Not long
indeed after he took orders he published in prose (1728) "A True
Estimate of Human Life," dedicated, notwithstanding the Latin
quotations with which it abounds, to the Queen; and a sermon
preached before the House of Commons, 1729, on the martyrdom of King
Charles, entitled, "An Apology for Princes; or, the Reverence due to
Government."  But the "Second Course," the counterpart of his
"Estimate," without which it cannot be called "A True Estimate,"
though in 1728 it was announced as "soon to be published," never
appeared, and his old friends the Muses were not forgotten.  In 1730
he relapsed to poetry, and sent into the world "Imperium Pelagi:  a
Naval Lyric, written in imitation of Pindar's Spirit, occasioned by
his Majesty's return from Hanover, September, 1729, and the
succeeding peace."  It is inscribed to the Duke of Chandos.  In the
Preface we are told that the Ode is the most spirited kind of
poetry, and that the Pindaric is the most spirited kind of Ode.
"This I speak," he adds, "with sufficient candour at my own very
great peril.  But truth has an eternal title to our confession,
though we are sure to suffer by it."  Behold, again, the fairest of
poets.  Young's "Imperium Pelagi" was ridiculed in Fielding's "Tom
Thumb;" but let us not forget that it was one of his pieces which
the author of the "Night Thoughts" deliberately refused to own.  Not
long after this Pindaric attempt he published two Epistles to Pope,
"Concerning the Authors of the Age," 1730.  Of these poems one
occasion seems to have been an apprehension lest, from the
liveliness of his satires, he should not be deemed sufficiently
serious for promotion in the Church.

In July, 1730, he was presented by his College to the Rectory of
Welwyn, in Hertfordshire.  In May, 1731, he married Lady Elizabeth
Lee, daughter of the Earl of Lichfield, and widow of Colonel Lee.
His connection with this lady arose from his father's acquaintance,
already mentioned, with Lady Anne Wharton, who was co-heiress of Sir
Henry Lee of Ditchley in Oxfordshire.  Poetry had lately been taught
by Addison to aspire to the arms of nobility, though not with
extraordinary happiness.  We may naturally conclude that Young now
gave himself up in some measure to the comforts of his new
connection, and to the expectations of that preferment which he
thought due to his poetical talents, or, at least, to the manner in
which they had so frequently been exerted.

The next production of his muse was "The Sea-piece," in two odes.

Young enjoys the credit of what is called an "Extempore Epigram on
Voltaire," who, when he was in England, ridiculed, in the company of
the jealous English poet, Milton's allegory of "Sin and Death:"

     "You are so witty, profligate and thin,
      At once we think thee Milton, Death, and Sin."

From the following passage in the poetical dedication of his "Sea-
piece" to Voltaire it seems that this extemporaneous reproof, if it
must be extemporaneous (for what few will now affirm Voltaire to
have deserved any reproof), was something longer than a distich, and
something more gentle than the distich just quoted.

     "No stranger, sir, though born in foreign climes.
         On DORSET Downs, when Milton's page,
         With Sin and Death provoked thy rage,
      Thy rage provoked who soothed with GENTLE rhymes?"

By "Dorset Downs" he probably meant Mr. Dodington's seat.  In Pitt's
Poems is "An Epistle to Dr. Edward Young, at Eastbury, in
Dorsetshire, on the Review at Sarum, 1722."

     "While with your Dodington retired you sit,
      Charmed with his flowing Burgundy and wit," etc.

Thomson, in his Autumn, addressing Mr. Dodington calls his seat the
seat of the Muses,

     "Where, in the secret bower and winding walk,
      For virtuous Young and thee they twine the bay."

The praises Thomson bestows but a few lines before on Philips, the
second

     "Who nobly durst, in rhyme-unfettered verse,
      With British freedom sing the British song,"

added to Thomson's example and success, might perhaps induce Young,
as we shall see presently, to write his great work without rhyme.

In 1734 he published "The Foreign Address, or the best Argument for
Peace, occasioned by the British Fleet and the Posture of Affairs.
Written in the Character of a Sailor."  It is not to be found in the
author's four volumes.  He now appears to have given up all hopes of
overtaking Pindar, and perhaps at last resolved to turn his ambition
to some original species of poetry.  This poem concludes with a
formal farewell to Ode, which few of Young's readers will regret:

     "My shell, which Clio gave, which KINGS APPLAUD,
      Which Europe's bleeding genius called abroad,
      Adieu!"

In a species of poetry altogether his own he next tried his skill,
and succeeded.

Of his wife he was deprived in 1741.  Lady Elizabeth had lost, after
her marriage with Young, an amiable daughter, by her former husband,
just after she was married to Mr. Temple, son of Lord Palmerston.
Mr. Temple did not long remain after his wife, though he was married
a second time to a daughter of Sir John Barnard's, whose son is the
present peer.  Mr. and Mrs. Temple have generally been considered as
Philander and Narcissa.  From the great friendship which constantly
subsisted between Mr. Temple and Young, as well as from other
circumstances, it is probable that the poet had both him and Mrs.
Temple in view for these characters; though, at the same time, some
passages respecting Philander do not appear to suit either Mr.
Temple or any other person with whom Young was known to be connected
or acquainted, while all the circumstances relating to Narcissa have
been constantly found applicable to Young's daughter-in-law.  At
what short intervals the poet tells us he was wounded by the deaths
of the three persons particularly lamented, none that has read the
"Night Thoughts" (and who has not read them?) needs to be informed.

     "Insatiate archer! could not one suffice?
      Thy shaft flew thrice, and thrice my peace was slain;
      And thrice, ere thrice yon moon had filled her horn."

Yet how is it possible that Mr. and Mrs. Temple and Lady Elizabeth
Young could be these three victims, over whom Young has hitherto
been pitied for having to pour the "Midnight Sorrows" of his
religious poetry?  Mrs. Temple died in 1736; Mr. Temple four years
afterwards, in 1740; and the poet's wife seven months after Mr.
Temple, in 1741.  How could the insatiate archer thrice slay his
peace, in these three persons, "ere thrice the moon had filled her
horn."  But in the short preface to "The Complaint" he seriously
tells us, "that the occasion of this poem was real, not fictitious,
and that the facts mentioned did naturally pour these moral
reflections on the thought of the writer."  It is probable,
therefore, that in these three contradictory lines the poet
complains more than the father-in-law, the friend, or the widower.
Whatever names belong to these facts, or if the names be those
generally supposed, whatever heightening a poet's sorrow may have
given the facts; to the sorrow Young felt from them religion and
morality are indebted for the "Night Thoughts."  There is a pleasure
sure in sadness which mourners only know!  Of these poems the two or
three first have been perused perhaps more eagerly and more
frequently than the rest.  When he got as far as the fourth or fifth
his original motive for taking up the pen was answered; his grief
was naturally either diminished or exhausted.  We still find the
same pious poet, but we hear less of Philander and Narcissa, and
less of the mourner whom he loved to pity.

Mrs. Temple died of a consumption at Lyons, on her way to Nice, the
year after her marriage; that is, when poetry relates the fact, "in
her bridal hour."  It is more than poetically true that Young
accompanied her to the Continent:

     "I flew, I snatched her from the rigid North,
      And bore her nearer to the sun."

But in vain.  Her funeral was attended with the difficulties painted
in such animated colours in "Night the Third."  After her death the
remainder of the party passed the ensuing winter at Nice.  The poet
seems perhaps in these compositions to dwell with more melancholy on
the death of Philander and Narcissa than of his wife.  But it is
only for this reason.  He who runs and reads may remember that in
the "Night Thoughts" Philander and Narcissa are often mentioned and
often lamented.  To recollect lamentations over the author's wife
the memory must have been charged with distinct passages.  This lady
brought him one child, Frederick, now living, to whom the Prince of
Wales was godfather.

That domestic grief is, in the first instance, to be thanked for
these ornaments to our language it is impossible to deny.  Nor would
it be common hardiness to contend that worldly discontent had no
hand in these joint productions of poetry and piety.  Yet am I by no
means sure that, at any rate, we should not have had something of
the same colour from Young's pencil, notwithstanding the liveliness
of his satires.  In so long a life causes for discontent and
occasions for grief must have occurred.  It is not clear to me that
his Muse was not sitting upon the watch for the first which
happened.  "Night Thoughts" were not uncommon to her, even when
first she visited the poet, and at a time when he himself was
remarkable neither for gravity nor gloominess.  In his "Last Day,"
almost his earliest poem, he calls her "The Melancholy Maid,"

                    "whom dismal scenes delight,
      Frequent at tombs and in the realms of Night."

In the prayer which concludes the second book of the same poem, he
says:

     "Oh! permit the gloom of solemn night
      To sacred thought may forcibly invite.
      Oh! how divine to tread the milky way,
      To the bright palace of Eternal Day!"

When Young was writing a tragedy, Grafton is said by Spence to have
sent him a human skull, with a candle in it, as a lamp, and the poet
is reported to have used it.  What he calls "The TRUE Estimate of
Human Life," which has already been mentioned, exhibits only the
wrong side of the tapestry, and being asked why he did not show the
right, he is said to have replied that he could not.  By others it
has been told me that this was finished, but that, before there
existed any copy, it was torn in pieces by a lady's monkey.  Still,
is it altogether fair to dress up the poet for the man, and to bring
the gloominess of the "Night Thoughts" to prove the gloominess of
Young, and to show that his genius, like the genius of Swift, was in
some measure the sullen inspiration of discontent?  From them who
answer in the affirmative it should not be concealed that, though
"Invisibilia non decipiunt" appeared upon a deception in Young's
grounds, and "Ambulantes in horto audierunt vocem Dei" on a building
in his garden, his parish was indebted to the good humour of the
author of the "Night Thoughts" for an assembly and a bowling green.

Whether you think with me, I know not; but the famous "De mortuis
nil nisi bonum" always appeared to me to savour more of female
weakness than of manly reason.  He that has too much feeling to
speak ill of the dead, who, if they cannot defend themselves, are at
least ignorant of his abuse, will not hesitate by the most wanton
calumny to destroy the quiet, the reputation, the fortune of the
living.  Yet censure is not heard beneath the tomb, any more than
praise.  "De mortuis nil nisi verum--De vivis nil nisi bonum" would
approach much nearer to good sense.  After all, the few handfuls of
remaining dust which once composed the body of the author of the
"Night Thoughts" feel not much concern whether Young pass now for a
man of sorrow or for "a fellow of infinite jest."  To this favour
must come the whole family of Yorick.  His immortal part, wherever
that now dwells, is still less solicitous on this head.  But to a
son of worth and sensibility it is of some little consequence
whether contemporaries believe, and posterity be taught to believe,
that his debauched and reprobate life cast a Stygian gloom over the
evening of his father's days, saved him the trouble of feigning a
character completely detestable, and succeeded at last in bringing
his "grey hairs with sorrow to the grave."  The humanity of the
world, little satisfied with inventing perhaps a melancholy
disposition for the father, proceeds next to invent an argument in
support of their invention, and chooses that Lorenzo should be
Young's own son.  "The Biographia," and every account of Young,
pretty roundly assert this to be the fact; of the absolute
impossibility of which, the "Biographia" itself, in particular
dates, contains undeniable evidence.  Readers I know there are of a
strange turn of mind, who will hereafter peruse the "Night Thoughts"
with less satisfaction; who will wish they had still been deceived;
who will quarrel with me for discovering that no such character as
their Lorenzo ever yet disgraced human nature or broke a father's
heart.  Yet would these admirers of the sublime and terrible be
offended should you set them down for cruel and for savage?  Of this
report, inhuman to the surviving son, if it be true, in proportion
as the character of Lorenzo is diabolical, where are we to find the
proof?  Perhaps it is clear from the poems.

From the first line to the last of the "Night Thoughts" no one
expression can be discovered which betrays anything like the father.
In the "Second Night" I find an expression which betrays something
else--that Lorenzo was his friend; one, it is possible, of his
former companions; one of the Duke of Wharton's set.  The poet
styles him "gay friend;" an appellation not very natural from a
pious incensed father to such a being as he paints Lorenzo, and that
being his son.  But let us see how he has sketched this dreadful
portrait, from the sight of some of whose features the artist
himself must have turned away with horror.  A subject more shocking,
if his only child really sat to him, than the crucifixion of Michael
Angelo; upon the horrid story told of which Young composed a short
poem of fourteen lines in the early part of his life, which he did
not think deserved to be republished.  In the "First Night" the
address to the poet's supposed son is:--

     "Lorenzo, Fortune makes her court to thee."

In the "Fifth Night:"--

     "And burns Lorenzo still for the sublime
      Of life? to hang his airy nest on high?"

Is this a picture of the son of the Rector of Welwyn?  "Eighth
Night:"--

     "In foreign realms (for thou hast travelled far)"--

which even now does not apply to his son.  In "Night Five:"--

     "So wept Lorenzo fair Clarissa's fate,
      Who gave that angel-boy on whom he dotes,
      And died to give him, orphaned in his birth!"

At the beginning of the "Fifth Night" we find:--

     "Lorenzo, to recriminate is just,
      I grant the man is vain who writes for praise."

But, to cut short all inquiry; if any one of these passages, if any
passage in the poems, be applicable, my friend shall pass for
Lorenzo.  The son of the author of the "Night Thoughts" was not old
enough, when they were written, to recriminate or to be a father.
The "Night Thoughts" were begun immediately after the mournful event
of 1741.  The first "Nights" appear, in the books of the Company of
Stationers, as the property of Robert Dodsley, in 1742.  The Preface
to "Night Seven" is dated July 7th, 1744.  The marriage, in
consequence of which the supposed Lorenzo was born, happened in May,
1731.  Young's child was not born till June, 1733.  In 1741, this
Lorenzo, this finished infidel, this father to whose education Vice
had for some years put the last hand, was only eight years old.  An
anecdote of this cruel sort, so open to contradiction, so impossible
to be true, who could propagate?  Thus easily are blasted the
reputation of the living and of the dead.  "Who, then, was Lorenzo?"
exclaim the readers I have mentioned.  If we cannot be sure that he
was his son, which would have been finely terrible, was he not his
nephew, his cousin?  These are questions which I do not pretend to
answer.  For the sake of human nature, I could wish Lorenzo to have
been only the creation of the poet's fancy:  like the Quintus of
Anti Lucretius, "quo nomine," says Polignac, "quemvis Atheum
intellige."  That this was the case many expressions in the "Night
Thoughts" would seem to prove, did not a passage in "Night Eight"
appear to show that he had somebody in his eye for the groundwork at
least of the painting.  Lovelace or Lorenzo may be feigned
characters; but a writer does not feign a name of which he only
gives the initial letter:--

     "Tell not Calista.  She will laugh thee dead,
      Or send thee to her hermitage with L---."

The "Biographia," not satisfied with pointing out the son of Young,
in that son's lifetime, as his father's Lorenzo, travels out of its
way into the history of the son, and tells of his having been
forbidden his college at Oxford for misbehaviour.  How such
anecdotes, were they true, tend to illustrate the life of Young, it
is not easy to discover.  Was the son of the author of the "Night
Thoughts," indeed, forbidden his college for a time, at one of our
Universities?  The author of "Paradise Lost" is by some supposed to
have been disgracefully ejected from the other.  From juvenile
follies who is free?  But, whatever the "Biographia" chooses to
relate, the son of Young experienced no dismission from his college,
either lasting or temporary.  Yet, were nature to indulge him with a
second youth, and to leave him at the same time the experience of
that which is past, he would probably spend it differently--who
would not?--he would certainly be the occasion of less uneasiness to
his father.  But, from the same experience, he would as certainly,
in the same case, be treated differently by his father.

Young was a poet:  poets, with reverence be it spoken, do not make
the best parents.  Fancy and imagination seldom deign to stoop from
their heights; always stoop unwillingly to the low level of common
duties.  Aloof from vulgar life, they pursue their rapid flight
beyond the ken of mortals, and descend not to earth but when
compelled by necessity.  The prose of ordinary occurrences is
beneath the dignity of poets.  He who is connected with the author
of the "Night Thoughts" only by veneration for the Poet and the
Christian may be allowed to observe that Young is one of those
concerning whom, as you remark in your account of Addison, it is
proper rather to say "nothing that is false than all that is true."
But the son of Young would almost sooner, I know, pass for a Lorenzo
than see himself vindicated, at the expense of his father's memory,
from follies which, if it may be thought blameable in a boy to have
committed them, it is surely praiseworthy in a man to lament and
certainly not only unnecessary, but cruel in a biographer to record.

Of the "Night Thoughts," notwithstanding their author's professed
retirement, all are inscribed to great or to growing names.  He had
not yet weaned himself from earls and dukes, from the Speakers of
the House of Commons, Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, and
Chancellors of the Exchequer.  In "Night Eight" the politician
plainly betrays himself:--

     "Think no post needful that demands a knave:
      When late our civil helm was shifting hands,
      So P--- thought:  think better if you can."

Yet it must be confessed that at the conclusion of "Night Nine,"
weary perhaps of courting earthly patrons, he tells his soul--

                         "Henceforth
      Thy PATRON he, whose diadem has dropped
      You gems of Heaven; Eternity thy prize;
      And leave the racers of the world their own."

The "Fourth Night" was addressed by "a much-indebted Muse" to the
Honourable Mr. Yorke, now Lord Hardwicke, who meant to have laid the
Muse under still greater obligation, by the living of Shenfield, in
Essex, if it had become vacant.  The "First Night" concludes with
this passage:--

     "Dark, though not blind, like thee, Meonides;
      Or, Milton, thee.  Ah! could I reach your strain;
      Or his who made Meonides our own!
      Man too he sung.  Immortal man I sing.
      Oh had he pressed his theme, pursued the track
      Which opens out of darkness into day!
      Oh, had he mounted on his wing of fire,
      Soared, where I sink, and sung immortal man--
      How had it blest mankind, and rescued me!"

To the author of these lines was dedicated, in 1756, the first
volume of an "Essay on the Writings and Genius of Pope," which
attempted, whether justly or not, to pluck from Pope his "Wing of
Fire," and to reduce him to a rank at least one degree lower than
the first class of English poets.  If Young accepted and approved
the dedication, he countenanced this attack upon the fame of him
whom he invokes as his Muse.

Part of "paper-sparing" Pope's Third Book of the "Odyssey,"
deposited in the Museum, is written upon the back of a letter signed
"E. Young," which is clearly the handwriting of our Young.  The
letter, dated only May 2nd, seems obscure; but there can be little
doubt that the friendship he requests was a literary one, and that
he had the highest literary opinion of Pope.  The request was a
prologue, I am told.

                                    "May the 2nd.

"DEAR SIR;--Having been often from home, I know not if you have done
me the favour of calling on me.  But, be that as it will, I much
want that instance of your friendship I mentioned in my last; a
friendship I am very sensible I can receive from no one but
yourself.  I should not urge this thing so much but for very
particular reasons; nor can you be at a loss to conceive how a
'trifle of this nature' may be of serious moment to me; and while I
am in hopes of the great advantage of your advice about it, I shall
not be so absurd as to make any further step without it.  I know you
are much engaged, and only hope to hear of you at your entire
leisure.
             "I am, sir, your most faithful
                      "and obedient servant,
                                  "E. YOUNG."

Nay, even after Pope's death, he says in "Night Seven:"--

     "Pope, who could'st make immortals, art thou dead?"

Either the "Essay," then, was dedicated to a patron who disapproved
its doctrine, which I have been told by the author was not the case;
or Young appears, in his old age, to have bartered for a dedication
an opinion entertained of his friend through all that part of life
when he must have been best able to form opinions.  From this
account of Young, two or three short passages, which stand almost
together in "Night Four," should not be excluded.  They afford a
picture, by his own hand, from the study of which my readers may
choose to form their own opinion of the features of his mind and the
complexion of his life.

                      "Ah me! the dire effect
      Of loitering here, of death defrauded long;
      Of old so gracious (and let that suffice),
      MY VERY MASTER KNOWS ME NOT.
      I've been so long remembered I'm forgot.
                    *          *
      When in his courtiers' ears I pour my plaint,
      They drink it as the Nectar of the Great;
      And squeeze my hand, and beg me come to-morrow.
                    *          *
      Twice told the period spent on stubborn Troy,
      Court favour, yet untaken, I BESIEGE.
                    *          *
      If this song lives, Posterity shall know
      One, though in Britain born, with courtiers bred,
      Who thought, even gold might come a day too late;
      Nor on his subtle deathbed planned his scheme
      For future vacancies in Church or State."

Deduct from the writer's age "twice told the period spent on
stubborn Troy," and you will still leave him more than forty when he
sate down to the miserable siege of court-favour.  He has before
told us--

     "A fool at forty is a fool indeed."

After all, the siege seems to have been raised only in consequence
of what the general thought his "deathbed."  By these extraordinary
poems, written after he was sixty, of which I have been led to say
so much, I hope, by the wish of doing justice to the living and the
dead, it was the desire of Young to be principally known.  He
entitled the four volumes which he published himself, "The Works of
the Author of the Night Thoughts."  While it is remembered that from
these he excluded many of his writings, let it not be forgotten that
the rejected pieces contained nothing prejudicial to the cause of
virtue or of religion.  Were everything that Young ever wrote to be
published, he would only appear perhaps in a less respectable light
as a poet, and more despicable as a dedicator; he would not pass for
a worse Christian or for a worse man.  This enviable praise is due
to Young.  Can it be claimed by every writer?  His dedications,
after all, he had perhaps no right to suppress.  They all, I
believe, speak, not a little to the credit of his gratitude, of
favours received; and I know not whether the author, who has once
solemnly printed an acknowledgment of a favour, should not always
print it.  Is it to the credit or to the discredit of Young, as a
poet, that of his "Night Thoughts" the French are particularly fond?

Of the "Epitaph on Lord Aubrey Beauclerk," dated 1740, all I know
is, that I find it in the late body of English poetry, and that I am
sorry to find it there.  Notwithstanding the farewell which he
seemed to have taken in the "Night Thoughts" of everything which
bore the least resemblance to ambition, he dipped again in politics.
In 1745 he wrote "Reflections on the Public Situation of the
Kingdom, addressed to the Duke of Newcastle;" indignant, as it
appears, to behold

     "---a pope-bred Princeling crawl ashore,
      And whistle cut-throats, with those swords that scraped
      Their barren rocks for wretched sustenance,
      To cut his passage to the British throne."

This political poem might be called a "Night Thought;" indeed, it
was originally printed as the conclusion of the "Night Thoughts,"
though he did not gather it with his other works.

Prefixed to the second edition of Howe's "Devout Meditations" is a
letter from Young, dated January 19, 1752, addressed to Archibald
Macauly, Esq., thanking him for the book, "which," he says, "he
shall never lay far out of his reach; for a greater demonstration of
a sound head and a sincere heart he never saw."

In 1753, when The Brothers had lain by him above thirty years, it
appeared upon the stage.  If any part of his fortune had been
acquired by servility of adulation, he now determined to deduct from
it no inconsiderable sum, as a gift to the Society for the
Propagation of the Gospel.  To this sum he hoped the profits of The
Brothers would amount.  In his calculation he was deceived; but by
the bad success of his play the Society was not a loser.  The author
made up the sum he originally intended, which was a thousand pounds,
from his own pocket.

The next performance which he printed was a prose publication,
entitled "The Centaur Not Fabulous, in Six Letters to a Friend on
the Life in Vogue."  The conclusion is dated November 29, 1754.  In
the third letter is described the death-bed of the "gay, young,
noble, ingenious, accomplished, and most wretched Altamont."  His
last words were--"My principles have poisoned my friend, my
extravagance has beggared my boy, my unkindness has murdered my
wife!"  Either Altamont and Lorenzo were the twin production of
fancy, or Young was unlucky enough to know two characters who bore
no little resemblance to each other in perfection of wickedness.
Report has been accustomed to call Altamont Lord Euston.

"The Old Man's Relapse," occasioned by an Epistle to Walpole, if
written by Young, which I much doubt, must have been written very
late in life.  It has been seen, I am told, in a Miscellany
published thirty years before his death.  In 1758 he exhibited "The
Old Man's Relapse," in more than words, by again becoming a
dedicator, and publishing a sermon addressed to the king.

The lively letter in prose, on "Original Composition," addressed to
Richardson, the author of "Clarissa," appeared in 1759.  Though he
despairs "of breaking through the frozen obstructions of age and
care's incumbent cloud into that flow of thought and brightness of
expression which subjects so polite require," yet it is more like
the production of untamed, unbridled youth, than of jaded fourscore.
Some sevenfold volumes put him in mind of Ovid's sevenfold channels
of the Nile at the conflagration:--

                           "--ostia septem
      Pulverulenta vocant, septem sine flumine valles."

Such leaden labours are like Lycurgus's iron money, which was so
much less in value than in bulk, that it required barns for strong
boxes, and a yoke of oxen to draw five hundred pounds.  If there is
a famine of invention in the land, we must travel, he says, like
Joseph's brethren, far for food, we must visit the remote and rich
ancients.  But an inventive genius may safely stay at home; that,
like the widow's cruse, is divinely replenished from within, and
affords us a miraculous delight.  He asks why it should seem
altogether impossible that Heaven's latest editions of the human
mind may be the most correct and fair?  And Jonson, he tells us, was
very learned, as Samson was very strong, to his own hurt.  Blind to
the nature of tragedy, he pulled down all antiquity on his head, and
buried himself under it.  Is this "care's incumbent cloud," or "the
frozen obstructions of age?"  In this letter Pope is severely
censured for his "fall from Homer's numbers, free as air, lofty and
harmonious as the spheres, into childish shackles and tinkling
sounds; for putting Achilles into petticoats a second time:" but we
are told that the dying swan talked over an epic plan with Young a
few weeks before his decease.  Young's chief inducement to write
this letter was, as he confesses, that he might erect a monumental
marble to the memory of an old friend.  He, who employed his pious
pen for almost the last time in thus doing justice to the exemplary
death-bed of Addison, might probably, at the close of his own life,
afford no unuseful lesson for the deaths of others.  In the
postscript he writes to Richardson that he will see in his next how
far Addison is an original.  But no other letter appears.

The few lines which stand in the last edition, as "sent by Lord
Melcombe to Dr. Young not long before his lordship's death," were
indeed so sent, but were only an introduction to what was there
meant by "The Muse's Latest Spark."  The poem is necessary, whatever
may be its merit, since the Preface to it is already printed.  Lord
Melcombe called his Tusculum "La Trappe":--

     "Love thy country, wish it well,
        Not with too intense a care;
      'Tis enough, that, when it fell,
        Thou its ruin didst not share.

      Envy's censure, Flattery's praise,
        With unmoved indifference view;
      Learn to tread life's dangerous maze,
        With unerring Virtue's clue.

      Void of strong desire and fear,
        Life's void ocean trust no more;
      Strive thy little bark to steer
        With the tide, but near the shore.

      Thus prepared, thy shortened sail
        Shall, whene'er the winds increase,
      Seizing each propitious gale,
        Waft thee to the Port of Peace.

      Keep thy conscience from offence,
        And tempestuous passions free,
      So, when thou art called from hence,
        Easy shall thy passage be;

      Easy shall thy passage be,
        Cheerful thy allotted stay,
      Short the account 'twixt God and thee;
        Hope shall meet thee on the way:

      Truth shall lead thee to the gate,
        Mercy's self shall let thee in,
      Where its never-changing state,
        Full perfection, shall begin."

The poem was accompanied by a letter.

               "La Trappe, the 27th of October, 1761
"DEAR SIR,--You seemed to like the ode I sent you for your
amusement; I now send it you as a present.  If you please to accept
of it, and are willing that our friendship should be known when we
are gone, you will be pleased to leave this among those of your own
papers that may possibly see the light by a posthumous publication.
God send us health while we stay, and an easy journey!--My dear Dr.
Young,
               "Yours, most cordially,
                           "MELCOMBE."

In 1762, a short time before his death, Young published
"Resignation."  Notwithstanding the manner in which it was really
forced from him by the world, criticism has treated it with no
common severity.  If it shall be thought not to deserve the highest
praise, on the other side of fourscore, by whom, except by Newton
and by Waller, has praise been merited?

To Mrs. Montagu, the famous champion of Shakespeare, I am indebted
for the history of "Resignation."  Observing that Mrs. Boscawen, in
the midst of her grief for the loss of the admiral, derived
consolation from the perusal of the "Night Thoughts," Mrs. Montagu
proposed a visit to the author.  From conversing with Young, Mrs.
Boscawen derived still further consolation; and to that visit she
and the world were indebted for this poem.  It compliments Mrs.
Montagu in the following lines:--

     "Yet write I must.  A lady sues:
        How shameful her request!
      My brain in labour with dull rhyme,
        Hers teeming with the best!"

And again--

     "A friend you have, and I the same,
        Whose prudent, soft address
      Will bring to life those healing thoughts
        Which died in your distress.
      That friend, the spirit of my theme
        Extracting for your ease,
      Will leave to me the dreg, in thoughts
        Too common; such as these."

By the same lady I was enabled to say, in her own words, that
Young's unbounded genius appeared to greater advantage in the
companion than even in the author; that the Christian was in him a
character still more inspired, more enraptured, more sublime, than
the poet; and that, in his ordinary conversation--

     "--letting down the golden chain from high,
      He drew his audience upward to the sky."

Notwithstanding Young had said, in his "Conjectures on Original
Composition," that "blank verse is verse unfallen, uncursed--verse
reclaimed, re-enthroned in the true language of the gods;"
notwithstanding he administered consolation to his own grief in this
immortal language, Mrs. Boscawen was comforted in rhyme.

While the poet and the Christian were applying this comfort, Young
had himself occasion for comfort, in consequence of the sudden death
of Richardson, who was printing the former part of the poem.  Of
Richardson's death he says--

     "When heaven would kindly set us free,
        And earth's enchantment end;
      It takes the most effectual means,
        And robs us of a friend."

To "Resignation" was prefixed an apology for its appearance, to
which more credit is due than to the generality of such apologies,
from Young's unusual anxiety that no more productions of his old age
should disgrace his former fame.  In his will, dated February, 1760,
he desires of his executors, IN A PARTICULAR MANNER, that all his
manuscript books and writings, whatever, might be burned, except his
book of accounts.  In September, 1764, he added a kind of codicil,
wherein he made it his dying entreaty to his housekeeper, to whom he
left 1,000 pounds, "that all his manuscripts might be destroyed as
soon as he was dead, which would greatly oblige her deceased
FRIEND."

It may teach mankind the uncertainty of wordly friendships to know
that Young, either by surviving those he loved, or by outliving
their affections, could only recollect the names of two FRIENDS, his
housekeeper and a hatter, to mention in his will; and it may serve
to repress that testamentary pride, which too often seeks for
sounding names and titles, to be informed that the author of the
"Night Thoughts" did not blush to leave a legacy to his "friend
Henry Stevens, a hatter at the Temple-gate."  Of these two remaining
friends, one went before Young.  But, at eighty-four, "where," as he
asks in The Centaur, "is that world into which we were born?"  The
same humility which marked a hatter and a housekeeper for the
friends of the author of the "Night Thoughts," had before bestowed
the same title on his footman, in an epitaph in his "Churchyard"
upon James Baker, dated 1749; which I am glad to find in the late
collection of his works.  Young and his housekeeper were ridiculed,
with more ill-nature than wit, in a kind of novel published by
Kidgell in 1755, called "The Card," under the names of Dr. Elwes and
Mrs. Fusby.  In April, 1765, at an age to which few attain, a period
was put to the life of Young.  He had performed no duty for three or
four years, but he retained his intellects to the last.

Much is told in the "Biographia," which I know not to have been
true, of the manner of his burial; of the master and children of a
charity-school, which he founded in his parish, who neglected to
attend their benefactor's corpse; and a bell which was not caused to
toll as often as upon those occasions bells usually toll.  Had that
humanity, which is here lavished upon things of little consequence
either to the living or to the dead, been shown in its proper place
to the living, I should have had less to say about Lorenzo.  They
who lament that these misfortunes happened to Young, forget the
praise he bestows upon Socrates, in the Preface to "Night Seven,"
for resenting his friend's request about his funeral.  During some
part of his life Young was abroad, but I have not been able to learn
any particulars.  In his seventh Satire he says,

     "When, after battle, I the field have SEEN
      Spread o'er with ghastly shapes which once were men."

It is known, also, that from this or from some other field he once
wandered into the camp with a classic in his hand, which he was
reading intently; and had some difficulty to prove that he was only
an absent poet, and not a spy.

The curious reader of Young's life will naturally inquire to what it
was owing, that though he lived almost forty years after he took
orders, which included one whole reign uncommonly long, and part of
another, he was never thought worthy of the least preferment.  The
author of the "Night Thoughts" ended his days upon a living which
came to him from his college without any favour, and to which he
probably had an eye when he determined on the Church.  To satisfy
curiosity of this kind is, at this distance of time, far from easy.
The parties themselves know not often, at the instant, why they are
neglected, or why they are preferred.  The neglect of Young is by
some ascribed to his having attached himself to the Prince of Wales,
and to his having preached an offensive sermon at St. James's.  It
has been told me that he had two hundred a year in the late reign,
by the patronage of Walpole; and that, whenever any one reminded the
king of Young, the only answer was, "he has a pension."  All the
light thrown on this inquiry, by the following letter from Secker,
only serves to show at what a late period of life the author of the
"Night Thoughts" solicited preferment:--

                 "Deanery of St. Paul's, July 8, 1758.

"GOOD DR. YOUNG,--I have long wondered that more suitable notice of
your great merit hath not been taken by persons in power.  But how
to remedy the omission I see not.  No encouragement hath ever been
given me to mention things of this nature to his majesty.  And
therefore, in all likelihood, the only consequence of doing it would
be weakening the little influence which else I may possibly have on
some other occasions.  Your fortune and your reputation set you
above the need of advancement; and your sentiments, above that
concern for it, on your own account, which, on that of the public,
is sincerely felt by
                  "Your loving Brother, THO. CANT."

At last, at the age of fourscore, he was appointed, in 1761, Clerk
of the Closet to the Princess Dowager.  One obstacle must have stood
not a little in the way of that preferment after which his whole
life seems to have panted.  Though he took orders, he never entirely
shook off politics.  He was always the lion of his master Milton,
"pawing to get free his hinder parts."  By this conduct, if he
gained some friends, he made many enemies.  Again:  Young was a
poet; and again, with reverence be it spoken, poets by profession do
not always make the best clergymen.  If the author of the "Night
Thoughts" composed many sermons, he did not oblige the public with
many.  Besides, in the latter part of his life, Young was fond of
holding himself out for a man retired from the world.  But he seemed
to have forgotten that the same verse which contains "oblitus
meorum," contains also "obliviscendus et illis."  The brittle chain
of worldly friendship and patronage is broken as effectually, when
one goes beyond the length of it, as when the other does.  To the
vessel which is sailing from the shore, it only appears that the
shore also recedes; in life it is truly thus.  He who retires from
the world will find himself, in reality, deserted as fast, if not
faster, by the world.  The public is not to be treated as the
coxcomb treats his mistress; to be threatened with desertion, in
order to increase fondness.

Young seems to have been taken at his word.  Notwithstanding his
frequent complaints of being neglected, no hand was reached out to
pull him from that retirement of which he declared himself
enamoured.  Alexander assigned no palace for the residence of
Diogenes, who boasted his surly satisfaction with his tub.  Of the
domestic manners and petty habits of the author of the "Night
Thoughts," I hoped to have given you an account from the best
authority; but who shall dare to say, To-morrow I will be wise or
virtuous, or to-morrow I will do a particular thing?  Upon inquiring
for his housekeeper, I learned that she was buried two days before I
reached the town of her abode.

In a letter from Tscharner, a noble foreigner, to Count Haller,
Tscharner says, he has lately spent four days with Young at Welwyn,
where the author tastes all the ease and pleasure mankind can
desire.  "Everything about him shows the man, each individual being
placed by rule.  All is neat without art.  He is very pleasant in
conversation, and extremely polite."  This, and more, may possibly
be true; but Tscharner's was a first visit, a visit of curiosity and
admiration, and a visit which the author expected.

Of Edward Young an anecdote which wanders among readers is not true,
that he was Fielding's Parson Adams.  The original of that famous
painting was William Young, who was a clergyman.  He supported an
uncomfortable existence by translating for the booksellers from
Greek, and, if he did not seem to be his own friend, was at least no
man's enemy.  Yet the facility with which this report has gained
belief in the world argues, were it not sufficiently known that the
author of the "Night Thoughts" bore some resemblance to Adams.  The
attention which Young bestowed upon the perusal of books is not
unworthy imitation.  When any passage pleased him he appears to have
folded down the leaf.  On these passages he bestowed a second
reading.  But the labours of man are too frequently vain.  Before he
returned to much of what he had once approved he died.  Many of his
books, which I have seen, are by those notes of approbation so
swelled beyond their real bulk, that they will hardly shut.

     "What though we wade in wealth, or soar in fame!
      Earth's highest station ends in HERE HE LIES!
      And DUST TO DUST concludes her noblest song!"

The author of these lines is not without his 'Hic jacet.'  By the
good sense of his son it contains none of that praise which no
marble can make the bad or the foolish merit; which, without the
direction of stone or a turf, will find its way, sooner or later, to
the deserving.

                    M. S.
              Optimi parentis
            EDWARDI YOUNG, LL.D.
Hujus Ecclesiae rect. et Elizabethae faem. praenob
         Conjugis ejus amantissimae
   Pio et gratissimo animo hoc marmor posuit
                    F. Y.
              Filius superstes.

Is it not strange that the author of the "Night Thoughts" has
inscribed no monument to the memory of his lamented wife?  Yet what
marble will endure as long as the poems?

Such, my good friend, is the account which I have been able to
collect of the great Young.  That it may be long before anything
like what I have just transcribed be necessary for you, is the
sincere wish of,
               Dear Sir, your greatly obliged Friend,
                              HERBERT CROFT, Jun.
  Lincoln's Inn, Sept., 1780.

P.S.--This account of Young was seen by you in manuscript, you know,
sir, and, though I could not prevail on you to make any alteration,
you insisted on striking out one passage, because it said that if I
did not wish you to live long for your sake, I did for the sake of
myself and of the world.  But this postscript you will not see
before the printing of it, and I will say here, in spite of you, how
I feel myself honoured and bettered by your friendship, and that if
I do credit to the Church, after which I always longed, and for
which I am now going to give in exchange the bar, though not at so
late a period of life as Young took orders, it will be owing, in no
small measure, to my having had the happiness of calling the author
of "The Rambler" my friend.                      H. C.
  Oxford, Oct., 1782.

Of Young's Poems it is difficult to give any general character, for
he has no uniformity of manner; one of his pieces has no great
resemblance to another.  He began to write early and continued long,
and at different times had different modes of poetical excellence in
view.  His numbers are sometimes smooth and sometimes rugged; his
style is sometimes concatenated and sometimes abrupt, sometimes
diffusive and sometimes concise.  His plan seems to have started in
his mind at the present moment, and his thoughts appear the effect
of chance, sometimes adverse and sometimes lucky, with very little
operation of judgment.  He was not one of those writers whom
experience improves, and who, observing their own faults, become
gradually correct.  His poem on the "Last Day," his first great
performance, has an equability and propriety, which he afterwards
either never endeavoured or never attained.  Many paragraphs are
noble, and few are mean, yet the whole is languid; the plan is too
much extended, and a succession of images divides and weakens the
general conception, but the great reason why the reader is
disappointed is that the thought of the LAST DAY makes every man
more than poetical by spreading over his mind a general obscurity of
sacred horror, that oppresses distinction and disdains expression.
His story of "Jane Grey" was never popular.  It is written with
elegance enough, but Jane is too heroic to be pitied.

"The Universal Passion" is indeed a very great performance.  It is
said to be a series of epigrams, but, if it be, it is what the
author intended; his endeavour was at the production of striking
distichs and pointed sentences, and his distichs have the weight of
solid sentiments, and his points the sharpness of resistless truth.
His characters are often selected with discernment and drawn with
nicety; his illustrations are often happy, and his reflections often
just. His species of satire is between those of Horace and Juvenal,
and he has the gaiety of Horace without his laxity of numbers, and
the morality of Juvenal with greater variation of images.  He plays,
indeed, only on the surface of life; he never penetrates the
recesses of the mind, and therefore the whole power of his poetry is
exhausted by a single perusal; his conceits please only when they
surprise.  To translate he never condescended, unless his
"Paraphrase on Job" may be considered as a version, in which he has
not, I think, been unsuccessful; he indeed favoured himself by
choosing those parts which most easily admit the ornaments of
English poetry.  He had least success in his lyric attempts, in
which he seems to have been under some malignant influence; he is
always labouring to be great, and at last is only turgid.

In his "Night Thoughts" he has exhibited a very wide display of
original poetry, variegated with deep reflections and striking
allusions, a wilderness of thought, in which the fertility of fancy
scatters flowers of every hue and of every odour.  This is one of
the few poems in which blank verse could not be changed for rhyme
but with disadvantage.  The wild diffusion of the sentiments and the
digressive sallies of imagination would have been compressed and
restrained by confinement to rhyme.  The excellence of this work is
not exactness but copiousness; particular lines are not to be
regarded; the power is in the whole, and in the whole there is a
magnificence like that ascribed to Chinese plantation, the
magnificence of vast extent and endless diversity.

His last poem was the "Resignation," in which he made, as he was
accustomed, an experiment of a new mode of writing, and succeeded
better than in his "Ocean" or his "Merchant."  It was very falsely
represented as a proof of decaying faculties.  There is Young in
every stanza, such as he often was in the highest vigour.  His
tragedies, not making part of the collection, I had forgotten, till
Mr. Stevens recalled them to my thoughts, by remarking, that he
seemed to have one favourite catastrophe, as his three plays all
concluded with lavish suicide, a method by which, as Dryden
remarked, a poet easily rids his scene of persons whom he wants not
to keep alive.  In Busiris there are the greatest ebullitions of
imagination, but the pride of Busiris is such as no other man can
have, and the whole is too remote from known life to raise either
grief, terror, or indignation.  The Revenge approaches much nearer
to human practices and manners, and therefore keeps possession of
the stage; the first design seems suggested by Othello, but the
reflections, the incidents, and the diction, are original.  The
moral observations are so introduced and so expressed as to have all
the novelty that can be required.  Of The Brothers I may be allowed
to say nothing, since nothing was ever said of it by the public.  It
must be allowed of Young's poetry that it abounds in thought, but
without much accuracy or selection.  When he lays hold of an
illustration he pursues it beyond expectation, sometimes happily, as
in his parallel of Quicksilver with Pleasure, which I have heard
repeated with approbation by a lady, of whose praise he would have
been justly proud, and which is very ingenious, very subtle, and
almost exact; but sometimes he is less lucky, as when, in his "Night
Thoughts," having it dropped into his mind that the orbs, floating
in space, might be called the CLUSTER of creation, he thinks of a
cluster of grapes, and says, that they all hang on the great vine,
drinking the "nectareous juice of immortal life."  His conceits are
sometimes yet less valuable.  In the "Last Day" he hopes to
illustrate the reassembly of the atoms that compose the human body
at the "Trump of Doom" by the collection of bees into a swarm at the
tinkling of a pan.  The Prophet says of Tyre that "her merchants are
princes."  Young says of Tyre in his "Merchant,"

     "Her merchants princes, and each DECK A THRONE."

Let burlesque try to go beyond him.

He has the trick of joining the turgid and familiar:  to buy the
alliance of Britain, "Climes were paid down."  Antithesis is his
favourite, "They for kindness hate:" and "because she's right, she's
ever in the wrong."  His versification is his own; neither his blank
nor his rhyming lines have any resemblance to those of former
writers; he picks up no hemistichs, he copies no favourite
expressions; he seems to have laid up no stores of thought or
diction, but to owe all to the fortuitous suggestions of the present
moment.  Yet I have reason to believe that, when once he had formed
a new design, he then laboured it with very patient industry; and
that he composed with great labour and frequent revisions.  His
verses are formed by no certain model; he is no more like himself in
his different productions than he is like others.  He seems never to
have studied prosody, nor to have had any direction but from his own
ear.  But with all his defects, he was a man of genius and a poet.



MALLET.



Of David Mallet, having no written memorial, I am able to give no
other account than such as is supplied by the unauthorised loquacity
of common fame, and a very slight personal knowledge.  He was by his
original one of the Macgregors, a clan that became, about sixty
years ago, under the conduct of Robin Roy, so formidable and so
infamous for violence and robbery, that the name was annulled by a
legal abolition; and when they were all to denominate themselves
anew, the father, I suppose, of this author, called himself Malloch.

David Malloch was, by the penury of his parents, compelled to be
Janitor of the High School at Edinburgh, a mean office of which he
did not afterwards delight to hear.  But he surmounted the
disadvantages of his birth and fortune; for, when the Duke of
Montrose applied to the College of Edinburgh for a tutor to educate
his sons, Malloch was recommended; and I never heard that he
dishonoured his credentials.  When his pupils were sent to see the
world, they were entrusted to his care; and having conducted them
round the common circle of modish travels, he returned with them to
London, where, by the influence of the family in which he resided,
he naturally gained admission to many persons of the highest rank,
and the highest character--to wits, nobles, and statesmen.  Of his
works, I know not whether I can trace the series.  His first
production was, "William and Margaret;" of which, though it contains
nothing very striking or difficult, he has been envied the
reputation; and plagiarism has been boldly charged, but never
proved.  Not long afterwards he published the "Excursion" (1728); a
desultory and capricious view of such scenes of nature as his fancy
led him, or his knowledge enabled him, to describe.  It is not
devoid of poetical spirit.  Many of his images are striking, and
many of the paragraphs are elegant.  The cast of diction seems to be
copied from Thomson, whose "Seasons" were then in their full blossom
of reputation.  He has Thomson's beauties and his faults.  His poem
on "Verbal Criticism" (1733) was written to pay court to Pope, on a
subject which he either did not understand, or willingly
misrepresented; and is little more than an improvement, or rather
expansion, of a fragment which Pope printed in a miscellany long
before he engrafted it into a regular poem.  There is in this piece
more pertness than wit, and more confidence than knowledge.  The
versification is tolerable, nor can criticism allow it a higher
praise.

His first tragedy was Eurydice, acted at Drury Lane in 1731; of
which I know not the reception nor the merit, but have heard it
mentioned as a mean performance.  He was not then too high to accept
a prologue and epilogue from Aaron Hill, neither of which can be
much commended.  Having cleared his tongue from his native
pronunciation so as to be no longer distinguished as a Scot, he
seems inclined to disencumber himself from all adherences of his
original, and took upon him to change his name from Scotch Malloch
to English Mallet, without any imaginable reason of preference which
the eye or ear can discover.  What other proofs he gave of
disrespect to his native country I know not; but it was remarked of
him that he was the only Scot whom Scotchmen did not commend.  About
this time Pope, whom he visited familiarly, published his "Essay on
Man," but concealed the author; and, when Mallet entered one day,
Pope asked him slightly what there was new.  Mallet told him that
the newest piece was something called an "Essay on Man," which he
had inspected idly, and seeing the utter inability of the author,
who had neither skill in writing nor knowledge of the subject, had
tossed it away.  Pope, to punish his self-conceit, told him the
secret.

A new edition of the works of Bacon being prepared (1740) for the
press, Mallet was employed to prefix a Life, which he has written
with elegance, perhaps with some affectation; but with so much more
knowledge of history than of science, that, when he afterwards
undertook the "Life of Marlborough," Warburton remarked that he
might perhaps forget that Marlborough was a general, as he had
forgotten that Bacon was a philosopher.

When the Prince of Wales was driven from the palace, and, setting
himself at the head of the opposition, kept a separate court, he
endeavoured to increase his popularity by the patronage of
literature, and made Mallet his under-secretary, with a salary of
two hundred pounds a year; Thomson likewise had a pension; and they
were associated in the composition of The Masque of Alfred, which in
its original state was played at Cliefden in 1740; it was afterwards
almost wholly changed by Mallet, and brought upon the stage at Drury
Lane in 1751, but with no great success.  Mallet, in a familiar
conversation with Garrick, discoursing of the diligence which he was
then exerting upon the "Life of Marlborough," let him know that in
the series of great men quickly to be exhibited he should FIND A
NICHE for the hero of the theatre.  Garrick professed to wonder by
what artifice he could be introduced:  but Mallet let him know that,
by a dexterous anticipation, he should fix him in a conspicuous
place.  "Mr. Mallet," says Garrick, in his gratitude of exultation,
"have you left off to write for the stage?"  Mallet then confessed
that he had a drama in his hands.  Garrick promised to act it; and
"Alfred" was produced.

The long retardation of the life of the Duke of Marlborough shows,
with strong conviction, how little confidence can be placed on
posthumous renown.  When he died, it was soon determined that his
story should be delivered to posterity; and the papers supposed to
contain the necessary information were delivered to Lord Molesworth,
who had been his favourite in Flanders.  When Molesworth died, the
same papers were transferred with the same design to Sir Richard
Steele, who, in some of his exigencies, put them in pawn.  They
remained with the old duchess, who in her will assigned the task to
Glover and Mallet, with a reward of a thousand pounds, and a
prohibition to insert any verses.  Glover rejected, I suppose, with
disdain, the legacy, and devolved the whole work upon Mallet; who
had from the late Duke of Marlborough a pension to promote his
industry, and who talked of the discoveries which he had made; but
left not, when he died, any historical labours behind him.  While he
was in the Prince's service he published Mustapha with a prologue by
Thomson, not mean, but far inferior to that which he had received
from Mallet for Agamemnon.  The epilogue, said to be written by a
friend, was composed in haste by Mallet, in the place of one
promised, which was never given.  This tragedy was dedicated to the
Prince his master.  It was acted at Drury Lane in 1739, and was well
received, but was never revived.  In 1740 he produced, as has been
already mentioned, The Masque of Alfred, in conjunction with
Thomson.  For some time afterwards he lay at rest.  After a long
interval his next work was "Amyntor and Theodora" (1747), a long
story in blank verse; in which it cannot be denied that there is
copiousness and elegance of language, vigour of sentiment, and
imagery well adapted to take possession of the fancy.  But it is
blank verse.  This he sold to Vaillant for one hundred and twenty
pounds.  The first sale was not great, and it is now lost in
forgetfulness.

Mallet, by address or accident, perhaps by his dependence on the
Prince, found his way to Bolingbroke, a man whose pride and
petulance made his kindness difficult to gain or keep, and whom
Mallet was content to court by an act which I hope was unwillingly
performed.  When it was found that Pope clandestinely printed an
unauthorised pamphlet called the "Patriot King," Bolingbroke in a
fit of useless fury resolved to blast his memory, and employed
Mallet (1749) as the executioner of his vengeance.  Mallet had not
virtue, or had not spirit, to refuse the office; and was rewarded,
not long after, with the legacy of Lord Bolingbroke's works.

Many of the political pieces had been written during the opposition
to Walpole, and given to Francklin, as he supposed, in perpetuity.
These, among the rest, were claimed by the will.  The question was
referred to arbitrators; but, when they decided against Mallet, he
refused to yield to the award; and, by the help of Millar the
bookseller, published all that he could find, but with success very
much below his expectation.

In 1775[sic], his masque of Britannia was acted at Drury Lane, and
his tragedy of Elvira in 1763; in which year he was appointed keeper
of the book of entries for ships in the port of London.  In the
beginning of the last war, when the nation was exasperated by ill
success, he was employed to turn the public vengeance upon Byng, and
wrote a letter of accusation under the character of a "Plain Man."
The paper was with great industry circulated and dispersed; and he,
for his seasonable intervention, had a considerable pension bestowed
upon him, which he retained to his death.  Towards the end of his
life he went with his wife to France; but after a while, finding his
health declining, he returned alone to England, and died in April,
1765.  He was twice married, and by his first wife had several
children.  One daughter, who married an Italian of rank named
Cilesia, wrote a tragedy called Almida, which was acted at Drury
Lane.  His second wife was the daughter of a nobleman's steward, who
had a considerable fortune, which she took care to retain in her own
hands.  His stature was diminutive, but he was regularly formed; his
appearance, till he grew corpulent, was agreeable, and he suffered
it to want no recommendation that dress could give it.  His
conversation was elegant and easy.  The rest of his character may,
without injury to his memory, sink into silence.  As a writer, he
cannot be placed in any high class.  There is no species of
composition in which he was eminent.  His dramas had their day, a
short day, and are forgotten:  his blank verse seems to my ear the
echo of Thomson.  His "Life of Bacon" is known, as it is appended to
Bacon's volumes, but is no longer mentioned.  His works are such as
a writer, bustling in the world, showing himself in public, and
emerging occasionally from time to time into notice, might keep
alive by his personal influence; but which, conveying little
information, and giving no great pleasure, must soon give way, as
the succession of things produces new topics of conversation and
other modes of amusement.



AKENSIDE.



Mark Akenside was born on the 9th of November, 1721, at Newcastle-
upon-Tyne.  His father Mark was a butcher, of the Presbyterian sect;
his mother's name was Mary Lumsden.  He received the first part of
his education at the grammar-school of Newcastle; and was afterwards
instructed by Mr. Wilson, who kept a private academy.  At the age of
eighteen he was sent to Edinburgh that he might qualify himself for
the office of a dissenting minister, and received some assistance
from the fund which the dissenters employ in educating young men of
scanty fortune.  But a wider view of the world opened other scenes,
and prompted other hopes:  he determined to study physic, and repaid
that contribution, which being received for a different purpose, he
justly thought it dishonourable to retain.  Whether, when he
resolved not to be a dissenting minister, he ceased to be a
dissenter, I know not.  He certainly retained an unnecessary and
outrageous zeal for what he called and thought liberty; a zeal which
sometimes disguises from the world, and not rarely from the mind
which it possesses, an envious desire of plundering wealth or
degrading greatness; and of which the immediate tendency is
innovation and anarchy, an impetuous eagerness to subvert and
confound, with very little care what shall be established.

Akenside was one of those poets who have felt very early the motions
of genius, and one of those students who have very early stored
their memories with sentiments and images.  Many of his performances
were produced in his youth; and his greatest work, "The Pleasures of
Imagination," appeared in 1744.  I have heard Dodsley, by whom it
was published, relate that when the copy was offered him, the price
demanded for it, which was a hundred and twenty pounds, being such
as he was not inclined to give precipitately, he carried the work to
Pope, who, having looked into it, advised him not to make a
niggardly offer; for "this was no every-day writer."

In 1741 he went to Leyden in pursuit of medical knowledge; and three
years afterwards (May 16, 1744) became Doctor of Physic, having,
according to the custom of the Dutch Universities, published a
thesis or dissertation.  The subject which he chose was "The
Original and Growth of the Human Foetus;" in which he is said to
have departed, with great judgment, from the opinion then
established, and to have delivered that which has been since
confirmed and received.

Akenside was a young man, warm with every notion that by nature or
accident had been connected with the sound of liberty, and, by an
eccentricity which such dispositions do not easily avoid, a lover of
contradiction, and no friend to anything established.  He adopted
Shaftesbury's foolish assertion of the efficacy of ridicule for the
discovery of truth.  For this he was attacked by Warburton, and
defended by Dyson; Warburton afterwards reprinted his remarks at the
end of his dedication to the Freethinkers.  The result of all the
arguments which have been produced in a long and eager discussion of
this idle question may easily be collected.  If ridicule be applied
to any position as the test of truth it will then become a question
whether such ridicule be just; and this can only be decided by the
application of truth, as the test of ridicule.  Two men fearing, one
a real, and the other a fancied danger, will be for a while equally
exposed to the inevitable consequences of cowardice, contemptuous
censure, and ludicrous representation; and the true state of both
cases must be known before it can be decided whose terror is
rational and whose is ridiculous; who is to be pitied, and who to be
despised.  Both are for a while equally exposed to laughter, but
both are not therefore equally contemptible.  In the revisal of his
poem, though he died before he had finished it, he omitted the lines
which had given occasion to Warburton's objections.  He published,
soon after his return from Leyden (1745), his first collection of
odes; and was impelled by his rage of patriotism to write a very
acrimonious epistle to Pulteney, whom he stigmatises, under the name
of Curio, as the betrayer of his country.  Being now to live by his
profession, he first commenced physician at Northampton, where Dr.
Stonehouse then practised, with such reputation and success, that a
stranger was not likely to gain ground upon him.  Akenside tried the
contest a while; and, having deafened the place with clamours for
liberty, removed to Hampstead, where he resided more than two years,
and then fixed himself in London, the proper place for a man of
accomplishments like his.  At London he was known as a poet, but was
still to make his way as a physician; and would perhaps have been
reduced to great exigencies but that Mr. Dyson, with an ardour of
friendship that has not many examples, allowed him three hundred
pounds a year.  Thus supported, he advanced gradually in medical
reputation, but never attained any great extent of practice or
eminence of popularity.  A physician in a great city seems to be the
mere plaything of fortune; his degree of reputation is, for the most
part, totally casual--they that employ him know not his excellence;
they that reject him know not his deficience.  By any acute observer
who had looked on the transactions of the medical world for half a
century a very curious book might be written on the "Fortune of
Physicians."

Akenside appears not to have been wanting to his own success:  he
placed himself in view by all the common methods; he became a Fellow
of the Royal Society; he obtained a degree at Cambridge; and was
admitted into the College of Physicians; he wrote little poetry, but
published from time to time medical essays and observations; he
became physician to St. Thomas's Hospital; he read the Gulstonian
Lectures in Anatomy; but began to give, for the Croonian Lecture, a
history of the revival of learning, from which he soon desisted; and
in conversation he very eagerly forced himself into notice by an
ambitious ostentation of elegance and literature.  His "Discourse on
the Dysentery" (1764) was considered as a very conspicuous specimen
of Latinity, which entitled him to the same height of place among
the scholars as he possessed before among the wits; and he might
perhaps have risen to a greater elevation of character but that his
studies were ended with his life by a putrid fever June 23, 1770, in
the forty-ninth year of his age.

Akenside is to be considered as a didactic and lyric poet.  His
great work is the "Pleasures of Imagination," a performance which,
published as it was at the age of twenty-three, raised expectations
that were not amply satisfied.  It has undoubtedly a just claim to
very particular notice as an example of great felicity of genius,
and uncommon aptitude of acquisitions, of a young mind stored with
images, and much exercised in combining and comparing them.  With
the philosophical or religious tenets of the author I have nothing
to do; my business is with his poetry.  The subject is well chosen,
as it includes all images that can strike or please, and thus
comprises every species of poetical delight.  The only difficulty is
in the choice of examples and illustrations; and it is not easy in
such exuberance of matter to find the middle point between penury
and satiety.  The parts seem artificially disposed, with sufficient
coherence, so as that they cannot change their places without injury
to the general design.  His images are displayed with such
luxuriance of expression that they are hidden, like Butler's Moon,
by a "Veil of Light;" they are forms fantastically lost under
superfluity of dress.  Pars minima est ipsa puella sui.  The words
are multiplied till the sense is hardly perceived; attention deserts
the mind, and settles in the ear.  The reader wanders through the
gay diffusion, sometimes amazed, and sometimes delighted; but, after
many turnings in the flowery labyrinth, comes out as he went in.  He
remarked little, and laid hold on nothing.  To his versification
justice requires that praise should not be denied.  In the general
fabrication of his lines he is perhaps superior to any other writer
of blank verse; his flow is smooth, and his pauses are musical; but
the concatenation of his verses is commonly too long continued, and
the full close does not occur with sufficient frequency.  The sense
is carried on through a long intertexture of complicated clauses,
and, as nothing is distinguished, nothing is remembered.

The exemption which blank verse affords from the necessity of
closing the sense with the couplet betrays luxuriant and active
minds into such self-indulgence that they pile image upon image,
ornament upon ornament, and are not easily persuaded to close the
sense at all.  Blank verse will therefore, I fear, be too often
found in description exuberant, in argument loquacious, and in
narration tiresome.  His diction is certainly poetical, as it is not
prosaic; and elegant, as it is not vulgar.  He is to be commended as
having fewer artifices of disgust than most of his brethren of the
blank song.  He rarely either recalls old phrases, or twists his
metre into harsh inversions.  The sense, however, of his words is
strained when "he views the Ganges from Alpine heights"--that is,
from mountains like the Alps.  And the pedant surely intrudes (but
when was blank verse without pedantry?) when he tells how "Planets
ABSOLVE the stated round of Time."

It is generally known to the readers of poetry that he intended to
revise and augment this work, but died before he had completed his
design.  The reformed work as he left it, and the additions which he
had made, are very properly retained in the late collection.  He
seems to have somewhat contracted his diffusion; but I know not
whether he has gained in closeness what he has lost in splendour.
In the additional book the "Tale of Solon" is too long.  One great
defect of this poem is very properly censured by Mr. Walker, unless
it may be said in his defence that what he has omitted was not
properly in his plan.  "His picture of man is grand and beautiful,
but unfinished.  The immortality of the soul, which is the natural
consequence of the appetites and powers she is invested with, is
scarcely once hinted throughout the poem.  This deficiency is amply
supplied by the masterly pencil of Dr. Young, who, like a good
philosopher, has invincibly proved the immortality of man from the
grandeur of his conceptions and the meanness and misery of his
state; for this reason a few passages are selected from the 'Night
Thoughts,' which, with those from Akenside, seem to form a complete
view of the powers, situation, and end of man."--"Exercises for
Improvement in Elocution," p. 66.

His other poems are now to be considered; but a short consideration
will despatch them.  It is not easy to guess why he addicted himself
so diligently to lyric poetry, having neither the ease and airiness
of the lighter, nor the vehemence and elevation of the grander ode.
When he lays his ill-fated hand upon his harp his former powers seem
to desert him; he has no longer his luxuriance of expression or
variety of images.  His thoughts are cold, and his words inelegant.
Yet such was his love of lyrics that, having written with great
vigour and poignancy his "Epistle to Curio," he transformed it
afterwards into an ode disgraceful only to its author.

Of his odes nothing favourable can be said; the sentiments commonly
want force, nature, or novelty; the diction is sometimes harsh and
uncouth, the stanzas ill-constructed and unpleasant, and the rhymes
dissonant or unskilfully disposed, too distant from each other, or
arranged with too little regard to established use, and therefore
perplexing to the ear, which in a short composition has not time to
grow familiar with an innovation.  To examine such compositions
singly cannot be required; they have doubtless brighter and darker
parts; but, when they are once found to be generally dull, all
further labour may be spared, for to what use can the work be
criticised that will not be read?



GRAY.



Thomas Gray, the son of Mr. Philip Gray, a scrivener of London, was
born in Cornhill, November 26, 1716.  His grammatical education he
received at Eton, under the care of Mr. Antrobus, his mother's
brother, then assistant to Dr. George, and when he left school, in
1734, entered a pensioner at Peterhouse, in Cambridge.  The
transition from the school to the college is, to most young
scholars, the time from which they date their years of manhood,
liberty, and happiness; but Gray seems to have been very little
delighted with academical gratifications; he liked at Cambridge
neither the mode of life nor the fashion of study, and lived
sullenly on to the time when his attendance on lectures was no
longer required.  As he intended to profess the common law, he took
no degree.  When he had been at Cambridge about five years, Mr.
Horace Walpole, whose friendship he had gained at Eton, invited him
to travel with him as his companion.  They wandered through France
into Italy; and Gray's "Letters" contain a very pleasing account of
many parts of their journey.  But unequal friendships are easily
dissolved; at Florence they quarrelled and parted; and Mr. Walpole
is now content to have it told that it was by his fault.  If we
look, however, without prejudice on the world, we shall find that
men whose consciousness of their own merit sets them above the
compliances of servility are apt enough in their association with
superiors to watch their own dignity with troublesome and
punctilious jealousy, and in the fervour of independence to exact
that attention which they refuse to pay.  Part they did, whatever
was the quarrel; and the rest of their travels was doubtless more
unpleasant to them both.  Gray continued his journey in a manner
suitable to his own little fortune, with only an occasional servant.
He returned to England in September, 1741, and in about two months
afterwards buried his father, who had, by an injudicious waste of
money upon a new house, so much lessened his fortune that Gray
thought himself too poor to study the law.  He therefore retired to
Cambridge, where he soon after became Bachelor of Civil Law, and
where, without liking the place or its inhabitants, or professing to
like them, he passed, except a short residence at London, the rest
of his life.  About this time he was deprived of Mr. West, the son
of a chancellor of Ireland, a friend on whom he appears to have set
a high value, and who deserved his esteem by the powers which he
shows in his "Letters" and in the "Ode to May," which Mr. Mason has
preserved, as well as by the sincerity with which, when Gray sent
him part of Agrippina, a tragedy that he had just begun, he gave an
opinion which probably intercepted the progress of the work, and
which the judgment of every reader will confirm.  It was certainly
no loss to the English stage that Agrippina was never finished.  In
this year (1742) Gray seems to have applied himself seriously to
poetry; for in this year were produced the "Ode to Spring," his
"Prospect of Eton," and his "Ode to Adversity."  He began likewise a
Latin poem, "De Principiis Cogitandi."

It may be collected from the narrative of Mr. Mason that his first
ambition was to have excelled in Latin poetry; perhaps it were
reasonable to wish that he had prosecuted his design; for though
there is at present some embarrassment in his phrase, and some
harshness in his lyric numbers, his copiousness of language is such
as very few possess; and his lines, even when imperfect, discover a
writer whom practice would have made skilful.  He now lived on at
Peterhouse, very little solicitous what others did or thought, and
cultivated his mind and enlarged his views without any other purpose
than of improving and amusing himself, when Mr. Mason, being elected
Fellow of Pembroke Hall, brought him a companion who was afterwards
to be his editor, and whose fondness and fidelity has kindled in him
a zeal of admiration which cannot be reasonably expected from the
neutrality of a stranger and the coldness of a critic.  In this
retirement he wrote (1747) an ode on the "Death of Mr. Walpole's
Cat;" and the year afterwards attempted a poem of more importance,
on "Government and Education," of which the fragments which remain
have many excellent lines.  His next production (1750) was his far-
famed "Elegy in the Churchyard," which, finding its way into a
magazine, first, I believe, made him known to the public.

An invitation from Lady Cobham about this time gave occasion to an
odd composition called "A Long Story," which adds little to Gray's
character.  Several of his pieces were published (1753) with designs
by Mr. Bentley; and, that they might in some form or other make a
book, only one side of each leaf was printed.  I believe the poems
and the plates recommended each other so well that the whole
impression was soon bought.  This year he lost his mother.  Some
time afterwards (1756) some young men of the college, whose chambers
were near his, diverted themselves with disturbing him by frequent
and troublesome noises, and, as is said, by pranks yet more
offensive and contemptuous.  This insolence, having endured it
awhile, he represented to the governors of the society, among whom
perhaps he had no friends; and finding his complaint little
regarded, removed himself to Pembroke Hall.

In 1759 he published "The Progress of Poetry" and "The Bard," two
compositions at which the readers of poetry were at first content to
gaze in mute amazement.  Some that tried them confessed their
inability to understand them, though Warburton said that they were
understood as well as the works of Milton and Shakespeare, which it
is the fashion to admire.  Garrick wrote a few lines in their
praise.  Some hardy champions undertook to rescue them from neglect;
and in a short time many were content to be shown beauties which
they could not see.

Gray's reputation was now so high that, after the death of Cibber,
he had the honour of refusing the laurel, which was then bestowed on
Mr. Whitehead.  His curiosity, not long after, drew him away from
Cambridge to a lodging near the Museum, where he resided near three
years, reading and transcribing, and, so far as can be discovered,
very little affected by two odes on "Oblivion" and "Obscurity," in
which his lyric performances were ridiculed with much contempt and
much ingenuity.  When the Professor of Modern History at Cambridge
died, he was, as he says, "cockered and spirited up," till he asked
it of Lord Bute, who sent him a civil refusal; and the place was
given to Mr. Brocket, the tutor of Sir James Lowther.  His
constitution was weak, and, believing that his health was promoted
by exercise and change of place, he undertook (1765) a journey into
Scotland, of which his account, so far as it extends, is very
curious and elegant; for, as his comprehension was ample, his
curiosity extended to all the works of art, all the appearances of
nature, and all the monuments of past events.  He naturally
contracted a friendship with Dr. Beattie, whom he found a poet, a
philosopher, and a good man.  The Mareschal College at Aberdeen
offered him a degree of Doctor of Laws, which, having omitted to
take it at Cambridge, he thought it decent to refuse.  What he had
formerly solicited in vain was at last given him without
solicitation.  The Professorship of History became again vacant, and
he received (1768) an offer of it from the Duke of Grafton.  He
accepted, and retained, it to his death; always designing lectures,
but never reading them; uneasy at his neglect of duty, and appeasing
his uneasiness with designs of reformation, and with a resolution
which he believed himself to have made of resigning the office if he
found himself unable to discharge it.  Ill-health made another
journey necessary, and he visited (1769) Westmoreland and
Cumberland.  He that reads his epistolary narration wishes that, to
travel, and to tell his travels, had been more of his employment;
but it is by studying at home that we must obtain the ability of
travelling with intelligence and improvement.  His travels and his
studies were now near their end.  The gout, of which he had
sustained many weak attacks, fell upon his stomach, and, yielding to
no medicines, produced strong convulsions, which (July 30, 1771)
terminated in death.  His character I am willing to adopt, as Mr.
Mason has done, from a letter written to my friend Mr. Boswell by
the Rev. Mr. Temple, rector of St. Gluvias in Cornwall; and am as
willing as his warmest well-wisher to believe it true:--

"Perhaps he was the most learned man in Europe.  He was equally
acquainted with the elegant and profound parts of science, and that
not superficially, but thoroughly.  He knew every branch of history,
both natural and civil; had read all the original historians of
England, France, and Italy; and was a great antiquarian.  Criticism,
metaphysics, morals, politics, made a principal part of his study;
voyages and travels of all sorts were his favourite amusements; and
he had a fine taste in painting, prints, architecture, and
gardening.  With such a fund of knowledge, his conversation must
have been equally instructing and entertaining; but he was also a
good man, a man of virtue and humanity.  There is no character
without some speck, some imperfection; and I think the greatest
defect in his was an affectation in delicacy, or rather effeminacy,
and a visible fastidiousness, or contempt and disdain of his
inferiors in science.  He also had, in some degree, that weakness
which disgusted Voltaire so much in Mr. Congreve:  though he seemed
to value others chiefly according to the progress they had made in
knowledge, yet he could not bear to be considered merely as a man of
letters; and, though without birth or fortune or station, his desire
was to be looked upon as a private independent gentleman, who read
for his amusement.  Perhaps it may be said, What signifies so much
knowledge, when it produced so little?  Is it worth taking so much
pains to leave no memorial but a few poems?  But let it be
considered that Mr. Gray was to others at least innocently employed;
to himself certainly beneficially.  His time passed agreeably; he
was every day making some new acquisition in science; his mind was
enlarged, his heart softened, his virtue strengthened; the world and
mankind were shown to him without a mask; and he was taught to
consider everything as trifling and unworthy of the attention of a
wise man except the pursuit of knowledge and practice of virtue in
that state wherein God hath placed us."

To this character Mr. Mason has added a more particular account of
Gray's skill in zoology.  He has remarked that Gray's effeminacy was
affected most "before those whom he did not wish to please;" and
that he is unjustly charged with making knowledge his sole reason of
preference, as he paid his esteem to none whom he did not likewise
believe to be good.

What has occurred to me from the slight inspection of his letters in
which my undertaking has engaged me is, that his mind had a large
grasp; that his curiosity was unlimited, and his judgment
cultivated; that he was a man likely to love much where he loved at
all; but that he was fastidious and hard to please.  His contempt,
however, is often employed, where I hope it will be approved, upon
scepticism and infidelity.  His short account of Shaftesbury (author
of the "Characteristics") I will insert:--

"You say you cannot conceive how Lord Shaftesbury came to be a
philosopher in vogue; I will tell you:  first, he was a lord;
secondly, he was as vain as any of his readers; thirdly, men are
very prone to believe what they do not understand; fourthly, they
will believe anything at all, provided they are under no obligation
to believe it; fifthly, they love to take a new road, even when that
road leads nowhere; sixthly, he was reckoned a fine writer, and
seems always to mean more than he said.  Would you have any more
reasons?  An interval of about forty years has pretty well destroyed
the charm.  A dead lord ranks with commoners; vanity is no longer
interested in the matter, for a new road has become an old one."

Mr. Mason has added, from his own knowledge, that though Gray was
poor he was not eager of money, and that out of the little that he
had he was very willing to help the necessitous.  As a writer, he
had this peculiarity--that he did not write his pieces first rudely,
and then correct them, but laboured every line as it arose in the
train of composition; and he had a notion, not very peculiar, that
he could not write but at certain times, or at happy moments--a
fantastic foppery to which my kindness for a man of learning and
virtue wishes him to have been superior.

Gray's poetry is now to be considered; and I hope not to be looked
on as an enemy to his name if I confess that I contemplate it with
less pleasure than his Life.  His ode "On Spring" has something
poetical, both in the language and the thought; but the language is
too luxuriant, and the thoughts have nothing new.  There has of late
arisen a practice of giving to adjectives derived from substantives
the termination of participles; such as the CULTURED plain, the
DAISIED bank; but I was sorry to see, in the lines of a scholar like
Gray, the HONIED Spring.  The morality is natural, but too stale;
the conclusion is pretty.

The poem "On the Cat" was doubtless by its author considered as a
trifle, but it is not a happy trifle.  In the first stanza, "the
azure flowers THAT blow" show resolutely a rhyme is sometimes made
when it cannot easily be found.  Selima, the cat, is called a nymph,
with some violence both to language and sense; but there is no good
use made of it when it is done; for of the two lines

     "What female heart can gold despise?
      What cat's averse to fish?"

the first relates merely to the nymph, and the second only to the
cat.  The sixth stanza contains a melancholy truth, that "a
favourite has no friend;" but the last ends in a pointed sentence of
no relation to the purpose.  If WHAT GLISTERED had been GOLD, the
cat would not have gone into the water; and if she had, would not
less have been drowned.

"The Prospect of Eton College" suggests nothing to Gray which every
beholder does not equally think and feel.  His supplication to
Father Thames to tell him who drives the hoop or tosses the ball is
useless and puerile.  Father Thames has no better means of knowing
than himself.  His epithet "buxom health" is not elegant; he seems
not to understand the word.  Gray thought his language more poetical
as it was more remote from common use.  Finding in Dryden "honey
redolent of spring," an expression that reaches the utmost limits of
our language, Gray drove it a little more beyond common apprehension
by making "gales" to be "redolent of joy and youth."

Of the "Ode on Adversity," the hint was at first taken from "O Diva,
gratum quae regis Antium;" but Gray has excelled his original by the
variety of his sentiments, and by their moral application.  Of this
piece, at once poetical and rational, I will not by slight
objections violate the dignity.

My process has now brought me to the WONDERFUL "Wonder of Wonders,"
the two Sister Odes, by which, though either vulgar ignorance or
common sense at first universally rejected them, many have been
since persuaded to think themselves delighted.  I am one of those
that are willing to be pleased, and therefore would gladly find the
meaning of the first stanza of the "Progress of Poetry."  Gray seems
in his rapture to confound the images of spreading sound and running
water.  A "stream of music" may be allowed; but where does "music,"
however "smooth and strong," after having visited the "verdant
vales, roll down the steep amain," so as that "rocks and nodding
groves rebellow to the roar"?  If this be said of music, it is
nonsense; if it be said of water, it is nothing to the purpose.  The
second stanza, exhibiting Mars' car and Jove's eagle, is unworthy of
further notice.  Criticism disdains to chase a schoolboy to his
common-places.  To the third it may likewise be objected that it is
drawn from mythology, though such as may be more easily assimilated
to real life.  Idalia's "velvet green" has something of cant.  An
epithet or metaphor drawn from Nature ennobles Art; an epithet or
metaphor drawn from Art degrades Nature.  Gray is too fond of words
arbitrarily compounded.  "Many-twinkling" was formerly censured as
not analogical; we may say "many-spotted," but scarcely "many-
spotting."  This stanza, however, has something pleasing.  Of the
second ternary of stanzas, the first endeavours to tell something,
and would have told it, had it not been crossed by Hyperion; the
second describes well enough the universal prevalence of poetry; but
I am afraid that the conclusion will not rise from the premises.
The caverns of the North and the plains of Chili are not the
residences of "glory and generous shame."  But that poetry and
virtue go always together is an opinion so pleasing that I can
forgive him who resolves to think it true.  The third stanza sounds
big with "Delphi," and "AEgean," and "Ilissus," and "Meander," and
"hallowed fountains," and "solemn sound;" but in all Gray's odes
there is a kind of cumbrous splendour which we wish away.  His
position is at last false.  In the time of Dante and Petrarch, from
whom we derive our first school of poetry, Italy was overrun by
"tyrant power" and "coward vice;" nor was our state much better when
we first borrowed the Italian arts.  Of the third ternary, the first
gives a mythological birth of Shakespeare.  What is said of that
mighty genius is true, but it is not said happily; the real effects
of this poetical power are put out of sight by the pomp of
machinery.  Where truth is sufficient to fill the mind, fiction is
worse than useless; the counterfeit debases the genuine.  His
account of Milton's blindness, if we suppose it caused by study in
the formation of his poem (a supposition surely allowable), is
poetically true, and happily imagined.  But the CAR of Dryden, with
his TWO COURSERS, has nothing in it peculiar; it is a car in which
any other rider may be placed.

"The Bard" appears, at the first view, to be, as Algarotti and
others have remarked, an imitation of the prophecy of Nereus.
Algarotti thinks it superior to its original; and, if preference
depends only on the imagery and animation of the two poems, his
judgment is right.  There is in "The Bard" more force, more thought,
and more variety.  But to copy is less than to invent, and the copy
has been unhappily produced at a wrong time.  The fiction of Horace
was to the Romans credible; but its revival disgusts us with
apparent and unconquerable falsehood.  INCREDULUS ODI.  To select a
singular event, and swell it to a giant's bulk by fabulous
appendages of spectres and predictions, has little difficulty; for
he that forsakes the probable may always find the marvellous.  And
it has little use; we are affected only as we believe; we are
improved only as we find something to be imitated or declined.  I do
not see that "The Bard" promotes any truth, moral or political.  His
stanzas are too long, especially his epodes; the ode is finished
before the ear has learned its measures, and consequently before it
can receive pleasure from their consonance and recurrence.  Of the
first stanza the abrupt beginning has been celebrated; but technical
beauties can give praise only to the inventor.  It is in the power
of any man to rush abruptly upon his subject that has read the
ballad of "Johnny Armstrong,"

     "Is there ever a man in all Scotland--?"

The initial resemblances or alliterations, "ruin, ruthless," "helm
or hauberk," are below the grandeur of a poem that endeavours at
sublimity.  In the second stanza the Bard is well described, but in
the third we have the puerilities of obsolete mythology.  When we
are told that "Cadwallo hushed the stormy main," and that "Modred
made huge Plinlimmon bow his cloud-topped head," attention recoils
from the repetition of a tale that, even when it was first heard,
was heard with scorn.  The WEAVING of the WINDING-SHEET he borrowed,
as he owns, from the Northern Bards, but their texture, however, was
very properly the work of female powers, as the act of spinning the
thread of life in another mythology.  Theft is always dangerous;
Gray has made weavers of slaughtered bards by a fiction outrageous
and incongruous.  They are then called upon to "Weave the warp and
weave the woof," perhaps with no great propriety, for it is by
crossing the WOOF with the WARP that men weave the WEB or piece, and
the first line was dearly bought by the admission of its wretched
correspondent, "Give ample room and verge enough."  He has, however,
no other line as bad.  The third stanza of the second ternary is
commended, I think, beyond its merit.  The personification is
indistinct.  THIRST and HUNGER are not alike, and their features, to
make the imagery perfect, should have been discriminated.  We are
told in the same stanza how "towers are fed."  But I will no longer
look for particular faults; yet let it be observed that the ode
might have been concluded with an action of better example, but
suicide is always to be had without expense of thought.

These odes are marked by glittering accumulations of ungraceful
ornaments, they strike rather than please; the images are magnified
by affectation; the language is laboured into harshness.  The mind
of the writer seems to work with unnatural violence.  "Double,
double, toil and trouble."  He has a kind of strutting dignity, and
is tall by walking on tiptoe.  His art and his struggle are too
visible, and there is too little appearance of ease and nature.  To
say that he has no beauties would be unjust; a man like him, of
great learning and great industry, could not but produce something
valuable.  When he pleases least, it can only be said that a good
design was ill directed.  His translations of Northern and Welsh
poetry deserve praise; the imagery is preserved, perhaps often
improved, but the language is unlike the language of other poets.
In the character of his Elegy I rejoice to concur with the common
reader, for by the common sense of readers uncorrupted with literary
prejudices, after all the refinements of subtlety and the dogmatism
of learning, must be finally decided all claim to poetical honours.
The "Churchyard" abounds with images which find a mirror in every
mind, and with sentiments to which every bosom returns an echo.  The
four stanzas, beginning "Yet even these bones," are to me original;
I have never seen the notions in any other place, yet he that reads
them here persuades himself that he has always felt them.  Had Gray
written often thus, it had been vain to blame and useless to praise
him.



LYTTELTON.



George Lyttelton, the son of Sir Thomas Lyttelton, of Hagley, in
Worcestershire, was born in 1709.  He was educated at Eton, where he
was so much distinguished that his exercises were recommended as
models to his schoolfellows.  From Eton he went to Christchurch,
where he retained the same reputation of superiority, and displayed
his abilities to the public in a poem on "Blenheim."  He was a very
early writer both in verse and prose.  His "Progress of Love" and
his "Persian Letters" were both written when he was very young, and,
indeed, the character of a young man is very visible in both.  The
verses cant of shepherds and flocks, and crooks dressed with
flowers; and the letters have something of that indistinct and
headstrong ardour for liberty which a man of genius always catches
when he enters the world, and always suffers to cool as he passes
forward.  He stayed not long in Oxford, for in 1728 he began his
travels, and saw France and Italy.  When he returned he obtained a
seat in Parliament, and soon distinguished himself among the most
eager opponents of Sir Robert Walpole, though his father, who was
Commissioner of the Admiralty, always voted with the Court.  For
many years the name of George Lyttelton was seen in every account of
every debate in the House of Commons.  He opposed the standing army;
he opposed the excise; he supported the motion for petitioning the
king to remove Walpole.  His zeal was considered by the courtiers
not only as violent but as acrimonious and malignant, and when
Walpole was at last hunted from his places, every effort was made by
his friends, and many friends he had, to exclude Lyttelton from the
secret committee.

The Prince of Wales, being (1737) driven from St. James's, kept a
separate court, and opened his arms to the opponents of the
Ministry.  Mr. Lyttelton became his Secretary, and was supposed to
have great influence in the direction of his conduct.  He persuaded
his master, whose business it was now to be popular, that he would
advance his character by patronage.  Mallet was made Under
Secretary, with 200 pounds, and Thomson had a pension of 100 pounds
a year.  For Thomson, Lyttelton always retained his kindness, and
was able at last to place him at ease.  Moore courted his favour by
an apologetical poem called the "Trial of Selim," for which he was
paid with kind words, which, as is common, raised great hopes, that
were at last disappointed.

Lyttelton now stood in the first rank of Opposition, and Pope, who
was incited, it is not easy to say how, to increase the clamour
against the Ministry, commended him among the other patriots.  This
drew upon him the reproaches of Fox, who in the House imputed to him
as a crime his intimacy with a lampooner so unjust and licentious.
Lyttelton supported his friend; and replied that he thought it an
honour to be received into the familiarity of so great a poet.
While he was thus conspicuous he married (1741) Miss Lucy Fortescue,
of Devonshire, by whom he had a son, the late Lord Lyttelton, and
two daughters, and with whom he appears to have lived in the highest
degree of connubial felicity; but human pleasures are short; she
died in childbed about five years afterwards, and he solaced his
grief by writing a long poem to her memory.  He did not, however,
condemn himself to perpetual solitude and sorrow, for after a while
he was content to seek happiness again by a second marriage with the
daughter of Sir Robert Rich, but the experiment was unsuccessful.
At length, after a long struggle, Walpole gave way, and honour and
profit were distributed among his conquerors.  Lyttelton was made
(1744) one of the Lords of the Treasury, and from that time was
engaged in supporting the schemes of the Ministry.

Politics did not, however, so much engage him as to withhold his
thoughts from things of more importance.  He had, in the pride of
juvenile confidence, with the help of corrupt conversation,
entertained doubts of the truth of Christianity; but he thought the
time now come when it was no longer fit to doubt or believe by
chance, and applied himself seriously to the great question.  His
studies, being honest, ended in conviction.  He found that religion
was true, and what he had learned he endeavoured to teach (1747) by
"Observations on the Conversion of St. Paul," a treatise to which
infidelity has never been able to fabricate a specious answer.  This
book his father had the happiness of seeing, and expressed his
pleasure in a letter which deserves to be inserted:--

"I have read your religious treatise with infinite pleasure and
satisfaction.  The style is fine and clear, the arguments close,
cogent, and irresistible.  May the King of Kings, whose glorious
cause you have so well defended, reward your pious labours, and
grant that I may be found worthy, through the merits of Jesus
Christ, to be an eye-witness of that happiness which I don't doubt
he will bountifully bestow upon you.  In the meantime I shall never
cease glorifying God for having endowed you with such useful
talents, and giving me so good a son.
                        "Your affectionate father,
                                   "THOMAS LYTTELTON."

A few years afterwards (1751), by the death of his father, he
inherited a baronet's title, with a large estate, which, though
perhaps he did not augment, he was careful to adorn by a house of
great elegance and expense, and by much attention to the decoration
of his park.  As he continued his activity in Parliament, he was
gradually advancing his claim to profit and preferment; and
accordingly was made in time (1754) Cofferer and Privy Councillor:
this place he exchanged next year for the great office of Chancellor
of the Exchequer--an office, however, that required some
qualifications which he soon perceived himself to want.  The year
after, his curiosity led him into Wales; of which he has given an
account, perhaps rather with too much affectation of delight, to
Archibald Bower, a man of whom he has conceived an opinion more
favourable than he seems to have deserved, and whom, having once
espoused his interest and fame he was never persuaded to disown.
Bower, whatever was his moral character, did not want abilities.
Attacked as he was by a universal outcry, and that outcry, as it
seems, the echo of truth, he kept his ground; at last, when his
defences began to fail him, he sallied out upon his adversaries, and
his adversaries retreated.

About this time Lyttelton published his "Dialogues of the Dead,"
which were very eagerly read, though the production rather, as it
seems, of leisure than of study--rather effusions than compositions.
The names of his persons too often enable the reader to anticipate
their conversation; and when they have met, they too often part
without any conclusion.  He has copied Fenelon more than Fontenelle.
When they were first published they were kindly commended by the
"Critical Reviewers;" and poor Lyttelton, with humble gratitude,
returned, in a note which I have read, acknowledgments which can
never be proper, since they must be paid either for flattery or for
justice.

When, in the latter part of the last reign, the inauspicious
commencement of the war made the dissolution of the Ministry
unavoidable, Sir George Lyttelton, losing with the rest his
employment, was recompensed with a peerage; and rested from
political turbulence in the House of Lords.

His last literary production was his "History of Henry the Second,"
elaborated by the searches and deliberations of twenty years, and
published with such anxiety as only vanity can dictate.  The story
of this publication is remarkable.  The whole work was printed twice
over, a great part of it three times, and many sheets four or five
times.  The booksellers paid for the first impression; but the
changes and repeated operations of the press were at the expense of
the author, whose ambitious accuracy is known to have cost him at
least a thousand pounds.  He began to print in 1755.  Three volumes
appeared in 1764, a second edition of them in 1767, a third edition
in 1768, and the conclusion in 1771.

Andrew Reid, a man not without considerable abilities and not
unacquainted with letters or with life, undertook to persuade
Lyttelton, as he had persuaded himself, that he was master of the
secret of punctuation; and, as fear begets credulity, he was
employed, I know not at what price, to point the pages of "Henry the
Second."  The book was at last pointed and printed, and sent into
the world.  Lyttelton took money for his copy, of which, when he had
paid the pointer, he probably gave the rest away; for he was very
liberal to the indigent.  When time brought the History to a third
edition, Reid was either dead or discarded; and the superintendence
of typography and punctuation was committed to a man originally a
comb-maker, but then known by the style of Doctor.  Something
uncommon was probably expected, and something uncommon was at last
done; for to the Doctor's edition is appended, what the world had
hardly seen before, a list of errors in nineteen pages.

But to politics and literature there must be an end.  Lord Lyttelton
had never the appearance of a strong or of a healthy man; he had a
slender, uncompacted frame, and a meagre face; he lasted, however,
sixty years, and was then seized with his last illness.  Of his
death a very affecting and instructive account has been given by his
physician, which will spare me the task of his moral character:--

"On Sunday evening the symptoms of his lordship's disorder, which
for a week past had alarmed us, put on a fatal appearance, and his
lordship believed himself to be a dying man.  From this time he
suffered from restlessness rather than pain; though his nerves were
apparently much fluttered, his mental faculties never seemed
stronger, when he was thoroughly awake.  His lordship's bilious and
hepatic complaints seemed alone not equal to the expected mournful
event; his long want of sleep, whether the consequence of the
irritation in the bowels, or, which is more probable, of causes of a
different kind, accounts for his loss of strength, and for his
death, very sufficiently.  Though his lordship wished his
approaching dissolution not to be lingering, he waited for it with
resignation.  He said, 'It is a folly, a keeping me in misery, now
to attempt to prolong life;' yet he was easily persuaded, for the
satisfaction of others, to do or take anything thought proper for
him.  On Saturday he had been remarkably better, and we were not
without some hopes of his recovery.

"On Sunday, about eleven in the forenoon, his lordship sent for me,
and said he felt a great hurry, and wished to have a little
conversation with me, in order to divert it.  He then proceeded to
open the fountain of that heart, from whence goodness had so long
flowed, as from a copious spring.  'Doctor,' said he, 'you shall be
my confessor:  when I first set out in the world I had friends who
endeavoured to shake my belief in the Christian religion.  I saw
difficulties which staggered me, but I kept my mind open to
conviction.  The evidences and doctrines of Christianity, studied
with attention, made me a most firm and persuaded believer of the
Christian religion.  I have made it the rule of my life, and it is
the ground of my future hopes.  I have erred and sinned; but have
repented, and never indulged any vicious habit.  In politics and
public life I have made public good the rule of my conduct.  I never
gave counsels which I did not at the time think the best.  I have
seen that I was sometimes in the wrong, but I did not err
designedly.  I have endeavoured in private life to do all the good
in my power, and never for a moment could indulge malicious or
unjust designs upon any person whatsoever.'

"At another time he said, 'I must leave my soul in the same state it
was in before this illness; I find this a very inconvenient time for
solicitude about anything.'

"On the evening, when the symptoms of death came on, he said, 'I
shall die; but it will not be your fault.'  When Lord and Lady
Valentia came to see his lordship, he gave them his solemn
benediction, and said, 'Be good, be virtuous, my lord; you must come
to this.'  Thus he continued giving his dying benediction to all
around him.  On Monday morning a lucid interval gave some small
hopes, but these vanished in the evening; and he continued dying,
but with very little uneasiness, till Tuesday morning, August 22,
when, between seven and eight o'clock, he expired, almost without a
groan."

His lordship was buried at Hagley, and the following inscription is
cut on the side of his lady's monument:--

    "This unadorned stone was placed here by the particular
     desire and express directions of the Right Honourable
                     GEORGE LORD LYTTELTON,
                who died August 22, 1773, aged 64."

Lord Lyttelton's Poems are the works of a man of literature and
judgment, devoting part of his time to versification.  They have
nothing to be despised, and little to be admired.  Of his "Progress
of Love," it is sufficient blame to say that it is pastoral.  His
blank verse in "Blenheim" has neither much force nor much elegance.
His little performances, whether songs or epigrams, are sometimes
sprightly, and sometimes insipid.  His epistolary pieces have a
smooth equability, which cannot much tire, because they are short,
but which seldom elevates or surprises.  But from this censure ought
to be excepted his "Advice to Belinda," which, though for the most
part written when he was very young, contains much truth and much
prudence, very elegantly and vigorously expressed, and shows a mind
attentive to life, and a power of poetry which cultivation might
have raised to excellence.




The Project Gutenberg Etext of Lives of the Poets: Gay, Thomson, Young etc.
by Samuel Johnson
******This file should be named lvgay10.txt or lvgay10.zip******

Corrected EDITIONS of our etexts get a new NUMBER, lvgay11.txt
VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, lvgay10a.txt

This etext was produced by Les Bowler, St. Ives, Dorset.

***

More information about this book is at the top of this file.


We are now trying to release all our eBooks one year in advance
of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing.
Please be encouraged to tell us about any error or corrections,
even years after the official publication date.

Please note neither this listing nor its contents are final til
midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
The official release date of all Project Gutenberg eBooks is at
Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month.  A
preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment
and editing by those who wish to do so.

Most people start at our Web sites at:
http://gutenberg.net or
http://promo.net/pg

These Web sites include award-winning information about Project
Gutenberg, including how to donate, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter (free!).


Those of you who want to download any eBook before announcement
can get to them as follows, and just download by date.  This is
also a good way to get them instantly upon announcement, as the
indexes our cataloguers produce obviously take a while after an
announcement goes out in the Project Gutenberg Newsletter.

http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/eBook03 or
ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/eBook03

Or /eBook02, 01, 00, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90

Just search by the first five letters of the filename you want,
as it appears in our Newsletters.


Information about Project Gutenberg (one page)

We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work.  The
time it takes us, a rather conservative estimate, is fifty hours
to get any eBook selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright
searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc.   Our
projected audience is one hundred million readers.  If the value
per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2
million dollars per hour in 2002 as we release over 100 new text
files per month:  1240 more eBooks in 2001 for a total of 4000+
We are already on our way to trying for 2000 more eBooks in 2002
If they reach just 1-2% of the world's population then the total
will reach over half a trillion eBooks given away by year's end.

The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away 1 Trillion eBooks!
This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers,
which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users.

Here is the briefest record of our progress (* means estimated):

eBooks Year Month

    1  1971 July
   10  1991 January
  100  1994 January
 1000  1997 August
 1500  1998 October
 2000  1999 December
 2500  2000 December
 3000  2001 November
 4000  2001 October/November
 6000  2002 December*
 9000  2003 November*
10000  2004 January*


The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been created
to secure a future for Project Gutenberg into the next millennium.

We need your donations more than ever!

As of February, 2002, contributions are being solicited from people
and organizations in: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South
Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West
Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

We have filed in all 50 states now, but these are the only ones
that have responded.

As the requirements for other states are met, additions to this list
will be made and fund raising will begin in the additional states.
Please feel free to ask to check the status of your state.

In answer to various questions we have received on this:

We are constantly working on finishing the paperwork to legally
request donations in all 50 states.  If your state is not listed and
you would like to know if we have added it since the list you have,
just ask.

While we cannot solicit donations from people in states where we are
not yet registered, we know of no prohibition against accepting
donations from donors in these states who approach us with an offer to
donate.

International donations are accepted, but we don't know ANYTHING about
how to make them tax-deductible, or even if they CAN be made
deductible, and don't have the staff to handle it even if there are
ways.

The most recent list of states, along with all methods for donations
(including credit card donations and international donations), may be
found online at http://www.gutenberg.net/donation.html

Donations by check or money order may be sent to:

Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
PMB 113
1739 University Ave.
Oxford, MS 38655-4109

Contact us if you want to arrange for a wire transfer or payment
method other than by check or money order.


The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been approved by
the US Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) organization with EIN
[Employee Identification Number] 64-622154.  Donations are
tax-deductible to the maximum extent permitted by law.  As fund-raising
requirements for other states are met, additions to this list will be
made and fund-raising will begin in the additional states.

We need your donations more than ever!

You can get up to date donation information at:

http://www.gutenberg.net/donation.html


***

If you can't reach Project Gutenberg,
you can always email directly to:

Michael S. Hart <hart@pobox.com>

Prof. Hart will answer or forward your message.

We would prefer to send you information by email.


**The Legal Small Print**


(Three Pages)

***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS**START***
Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers.
They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with
your copy of this eBook, even if you got it for free from
someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our
fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement
disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how
you may distribute copies of this eBook if you want to.

*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS EBOOK
By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
eBook, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept
this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive
a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this eBook by
sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person
you got it from. If you received this eBook on a physical
medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request.

ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM EBOOKS
This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBooks,
is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor Michael S. Hart
through the Project Gutenberg Association (the "Project").
Among other things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright
on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and
without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth
below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this eBook
under the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark.

Please do not use the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark to market
any commercial products without permission.

To create these eBooks, the Project expends considerable
efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain
works. Despite these efforts, the Project's eBooks and any
medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other
things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged
disk or other eBook medium, a computer virus, or computer
codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES
But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below,
[1] Michael Hart and the Foundation (and any other party you may
receive this eBook from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook) disclaims
all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including
legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR
UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

If you discover a Defect in this eBook within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any)
you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that
time to the person you received it from. If you received it
on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and
such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement
copy. If you received it electronically, such person may
choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to
receive it electronically.

THIS EBOOK IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS
TO THE EBOOK OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or
the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the
above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you
may have other legal rights.

INDEMNITY
You will indemnify and hold Michael Hart, the Foundation,
and its trustees and agents, and any volunteers associated
with the production and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
texts harmless, from all liability, cost and expense, including
legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the
following that you do or cause:  [1] distribution of this eBook,
[2] alteration, modification, or addition to the eBook,
or [3] any Defect.

DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm"
You may distribute copies of this eBook electronically, or by
disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this
"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg,
or:

[1]  Only give exact copies of it.  Among other things, this
     requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the
     eBook or this "small print!" statement.  You may however,
     if you wish, distribute this eBook in machine readable
     binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form,
     including any form resulting from conversion by word
     processing or hypertext software, but only so long as
     *EITHER*:

     [*]  The eBook, when displayed, is clearly readable, and
          does *not* contain characters other than those
          intended by the author of the work, although tilde
          (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may
          be used to convey punctuation intended by the
          author, and additional characters may be used to
          indicate hypertext links; OR

     [*]  The eBook may be readily converted by the reader at
          no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent
          form by the program that displays the eBook (as is
          the case, for instance, with most word processors);
          OR

     [*]  You provide, or agree to also provide on request at
          no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the
          eBook in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC
          or other equivalent proprietary form).

[2]  Honor the eBook refund and replacement provisions of this
     "Small Print!" statement.

[3]  Pay a trademark license fee to the Foundation of 20% of the
     gross profits you derive calculated using the method you
     already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  If you
     don't derive profits, no royalty is due.  Royalties are
     payable to "Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation"
     the 60 days following each date you prepare (or were
     legally required to prepare) your annual (or equivalent
     periodic) tax return.  Please contact us beforehand to
     let us know your plans and to work out the details.

WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO?
Project Gutenberg is dedicated to increasing the number of
public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed
in machine readable form.

The Project gratefully accepts contributions of money, time,
public domain materials, or royalty free copyright licenses.
Money should be paid to the:
"Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."

If you are interested in contributing scanning equipment or
software or other items, please contact Michael Hart at:
hart@pobox.com

[Portions of this header are copyright (C) 2001 by Michael S. Hart
and may be reprinted only when these eBooks are free of all fees.]
[Project Gutenberg is a TradeMark and may not be used in any sales
of Project Gutenberg eBooks or other materials be they hardware or
software or any other related product without express permission.]

*END THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS*Ver.02/11/02*END*



End of The Project Gutenberg Etext of Lives of the Poets: Gay, Thomson etc.
by Samuel Johnson